Evaluating Large Language Models for Structured Science Summarization in the Open Research Knowledge Graph

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02105v1
• Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:03:04 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Large Language Models for Structured Science Summarization in the Open Research Knowledge Graph
• Authors: Vladyslav Nechakhin, Jennifer D'Souza, Steffen Eger,
• Abstract summary: We propose using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically suggest properties for structured science summaries. Our study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis between ORKG's manually curated properties and those generated by the aforementioned state-of-the-art LLMs. Overall, LLMs show potential as recommendation systems for structuring science, but further finetuning is recommended to improve their alignment with scientific tasks and mimicry of human expertise.
• Score: 18.41743815836192
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Structured science summaries or research contributions using properties or dimensions beyond traditional keywords enhances science findability. Current methods, such as those used by the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), involve manually curating properties to describe research papers' contributions in a structured manner, but this is labor-intensive and inconsistent between the domain expert human curators. We propose using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically suggest these properties. However, it's essential to assess the readiness of LLMs like GPT-3.5, Llama 2, and Mistral for this task before application. Our study performs a comprehensive comparative analysis between ORKG's manually curated properties and those generated by the aforementioned state-of-the-art LLMs. We evaluate LLM performance through four unique perspectives: semantic alignment and deviation with ORKG properties, fine-grained properties mapping accuracy, SciNCL embeddings-based cosine similarity, and expert surveys comparing manual annotations with LLM outputs. These evaluations occur within a multidisciplinary science setting. Overall, LLMs show potential as recommendation systems for structuring science, but further finetuning is recommended to improve their alignment with scientific tasks and mimicry of human expertise.

Related papers

• Unveiling and Consulting Core Experts in Retrieval-Augmented MoE-based LLMs [64.9693406713216]
  Internal mechanisms that contribute to the effectiveness of RAG systems remain underexplored. Our experiments reveal that several core groups of experts are primarily responsible for RAG-related behaviors. We propose several strategies to enhance RAG's efficiency and effectiveness through expert activation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T16:08:54Z)
• Fine-tuning and Prompt Engineering with Cognitive Knowledge Graphs for Scholarly Knowledge Organization [0.14999444543328289]
  This research focuses on effectively conveying structured scholarly knowledge by utilizing large language models (LLMs) LLMs categorize scholarly articles and describe their contributions in a structured and comparable manner. Our methodology involves harnessing LLM knowledge, and complementing it with domain expert-verified scholarly data sourced from a CKG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T11:31:02Z)
• Knowledge AI: Fine-tuning NLP Models for Facilitating Scientific Knowledge Extraction and Understanding [0.0]
  This project investigates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) in understanding and extracting scientific knowledge across specific domains. We employ pre-trained models and fine-tune them on datasets in the scientific domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-04T01:32:09Z)
• SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [80.49349719239584]
  We present SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning), a dataset of 137K instruction-following demonstrations for 54 tasks. SciRIFF is the first dataset focused on extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across a wide range of scientific fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z)
• Leveraging Large Language Models for Semantic Query Processing in a Scholarly Knowledge Graph [1.7418328181959968]
  The proposed research aims to develop an innovative semantic query processing system. It enables users to obtain comprehensive information about research works produced by Computer Science (CS) researchers at the Australian National University.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T09:19:45Z)
• Rethinking Scientific Summarization Evaluation: Grounding Explainable Metrics on Facet-aware Benchmark [43.94573037950725]
  This paper presents conceptual and experimental analyses of scientific summarization. We introduce the Facet-aware Metric (FM), employing LLMs for advanced semantic matching to evaluate summaries. Our findings confirm that FM offers a more logical approach to evaluating scientific summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T07:58:29Z)
• A Survey on Knowledge Distillation of Large Language Models [99.11900233108487]
  Knowledge Distillation (KD) emerges as a pivotal methodology for transferring advanced capabilities to open-source models. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of KD's role within the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T16:17:37Z)
• Mining experimental data from Materials Science literature with Large Language Models: an evaluation study [1.9849264945671101]
  This study is dedicated to assessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in extracting structured information from scientific documents in materials science. We focus on two critical tasks of information extraction: (i) a named entity recognition (NER) of studied materials and physical properties and (ii) a relation extraction (RE) between these entities. The performance of LLMs in executing these tasks is benchmarked against traditional models based on the BERT architecture and rule-based approaches (baseline)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T23:00:31Z)
• Exploring the Cognitive Knowledge Structure of Large Language Models: An Educational Diagnostic Assessment Approach [50.125704610228254]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have not only exhibited exceptional performance across various tasks, but also demonstrated sparks of intelligence. Recent studies have focused on assessing their capabilities on human exams and revealed their impressive competence in different domains. We conduct an evaluation using MoocRadar, a meticulously annotated human test dataset based on Bloom taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T09:55:45Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation [77.91673633328148]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This survey presents a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms, respectively Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T13:51:26Z)
• LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction and Reasoning: Recent Capabilities and Future Opportunities [66.36633042421387]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for Knowledge Graph (KG) construction and reasoning evaluated. We propose AutoKG, a multi-agent-based approach employing LLMs and external sources for KG construction and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:56:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.