Preventive Audits for Data Applications Before Data Sharing in the Power IoT

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.02963v1
• Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 15:07:56 GMT
• Title: Preventive Audits for Data Applications Before Data Sharing in the Power IoT
• Authors: Bohong Wang, Qinglai Guo, Yanxi Lin, Yang Yu,
• Abstract summary: Data owners should conduct preventive audits for data applications before data sharing. Data sharing in the power IoT is regarded as the background. preventive audits should be conducted based on changes in the data feature parameters before and after data sharing.
• Score: 4.899053698192078
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: With the increase in data volume, more types of data are being used and shared, especially in the power Internet of Things (IoT). However, the processes of data sharing may lead to unexpected information leakage because of the ubiquitous relevance among the different data, thus it is necessary for data owners to conduct preventive audits for data applications before data sharing to avoid the risk of key information leakage. Considering that the same data may play completely different roles in different application scenarios, data owners should know the expected data applications of the data buyers in advance and provide modified data that are less relevant to the private information of the data owners and more relevant to the nonprivate information that the data buyers need. In this paper, data sharing in the power IoT is regarded as the background, and the mutual information of the data and their implicit information is selected as the data feature parameter to indicate the relevance between the data and their implicit information or the ability to infer the implicit information from the data. Therefore, preventive audits should be conducted based on changes in the data feature parameters before and after data sharing. The probability exchange adjustment method is proposed as the theoretical basis of preventive audits under simplified consumption, and the corresponding optimization models are constructed and extended to more practical scenarios with multivariate characteristics. Finally, case studies are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed preventive audits.

Related papers

• Lazy Data Practices Harm Fairness Research [49.02318458244464]
  We present a comprehensive analysis of fair ML datasets, demonstrating how unreflective practices hinder the reach and reliability of algorithmic fairness findings. Our analyses identify three main areas of concern: (1) a textbflack of representation for certain protected attributes in both data and evaluations; (2) the widespread textbf of minorities during data preprocessing; and (3) textbfopaque data processing threatening the generalization of fairness research. This study underscores the need for a critical reevaluation of data practices in fair ML and offers directions to improve both the sourcing and usage of datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T09:51:24Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Debiasing using Data Augmentation and Machine Unlearning [3.049887057143419]
  Data augmentation exposes machine learning models to privacy attacks, such as membership inference attacks. We propose an effective combination of data augmentation and machine unlearning, which can reduce data bias while providing a provable defense against known attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T21:54:20Z)
• DataCook: Crafting Anti-Adversarial Examples for Healthcare Data Copyright Protection [47.91906879320081]
  DataCook operates by "cooking" the raw data before distribution, enabling the development of models that perform normally on this processed data. During the deployment phase, the original test data must be also "cooked" through DataCook to ensure normal model performance. The mechanism behind DataCook is by crafting anti-adversarial examples (AntiAdv), which are designed to enhance model confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T14:44:51Z)
• Privacy-Aware Data Acquisition under Data Similarity in Regression Markets [29.64195175524365]
  We show that data similarity and privacy preferences are integral to market design. We numerically evaluate how data similarity affects market participation and traded data value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T09:39:04Z)
• Data Acquisition: A New Frontier in Data-centric AI [65.90972015426274]
  We first present an investigation of current data marketplaces, revealing lack of platforms offering detailed information about datasets. We then introduce the DAM challenge, a benchmark to model the interaction between the data providers and acquirers. Our evaluation of the submitted strategies underlines the need for effective data acquisition strategies in Machine Learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T22:15:17Z)
• Striving for data-model efficiency: Identifying data externalities on group performance [75.17591306911015]
  Building trustworthy, effective, and responsible machine learning systems hinges on understanding how differences in training data and modeling decisions interact to impact predictive performance. We focus on a particular type of data-model inefficiency, in which adding training data from some sources can actually lower performance evaluated on key sub-groups of the population. Our results indicate that data-efficiency is a key component of both accurate and trustworthy machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T16:48:27Z)
• Certified Data Removal in Sum-Product Networks [78.27542864367821]
  Deleting the collected data is often insufficient to guarantee data privacy. UnlearnSPN is an algorithm that removes the influence of single data points from a trained sum-product network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T08:22:37Z)
• Fundamentals of Task-Agnostic Data Valuation [21.78555506720078]
  We study valuing the data of a data owner/seller for a data seeker/buyer. We focus on task-agnostic data valuation without any validation requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-25T22:07:07Z)
• Data Sharing Markets [95.13209326119153]
  We study a setup where each agent can be both buyer and seller of data. We consider two cases: bilateral data exchange (trading data with data) and unilateral data exchange (trading data with money)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T06:00:34Z)
• Causally Constrained Data Synthesis for Private Data Release [36.80484740314504]
  Using synthetic data which reflects certain statistical properties of the original data preserves the privacy of the original data. Prior works utilize differentially private data release mechanisms to provide formal privacy guarantees. We propose incorporating causal information into the training process to favorably modify the aforementioned trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-27T13:46:57Z)
• Deep Directed Information-Based Learning for Privacy-Preserving Smart Meter Data Release [30.409342804445306]
  We study the problem in the context of time series data and smart meters (SMs) power consumption measurements. We introduce the Directed Information (DI) as a more meaningful measure of privacy in the considered setting. Our empirical studies on real-world data sets from SMs measurements in the worst-case scenario show the existing trade-offs between privacy and utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-20T13:41:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.