DOLOMITES: Domain-Specific Long-Form Methodical Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05938v2
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:53:48 GMT
• Title: DOLOMITES: Domain-Specific Long-Form Methodical Tasks
• Authors: Chaitanya Malaviya, Priyanka Agrawal, Kuzman Ganchev, Pranesh Srinivasan, Fantine Huot, Jonathan Berant, Mark Yatskar, Dipanjan Das, Mirella Lapata, Chris Alberti,
• Abstract summary: We develop a typology of methodical tasks structured in the form of a task objective, procedure, input, and output. We introduce DoLoMiTes, a novel benchmark with specifications for 519 such tasks elicited from hundreds of experts from across 25 fields. Our benchmark further contains specific instantiations of methodical tasks with concrete input and output examples.
• Score: 81.63464319950664
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Experts in various fields routinely perform methodical writing tasks to plan, organize, and report their work. From a clinician writing a differential diagnosis for a patient, to a teacher writing a lesson plan for students, these tasks are pervasive, requiring to methodically generate structured long-form output for a given input. We develop a typology of methodical tasks structured in the form of a task objective, procedure, input, and output, and introduce DoLoMiTes, a novel benchmark with specifications for 519 such tasks elicited from hundreds of experts from across 25 fields. Our benchmark further contains specific instantiations of methodical tasks with concrete input and output examples (1,857 in total) which we obtain by collecting expert revisions of up to 10 model-generated examples of each task. We use these examples to evaluate contemporary language models highlighting that automating methodical tasks is a challenging long-form generation problem, as it requires performing complex inferences, while drawing upon the given context as well as domain knowledge.

Related papers

• Creating a Trajectory for Code Writing: Algorithmic Reasoning Tasks [0.923607423080658]
  This paper describes instruments and the machine learning models used for validating them. We have used the data collected in an introductory programming course in the penultimate week of the semester. Preliminary research suggests ART type instruments can be combined with specific machine learning models to act as an effective learning trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T05:07:01Z)
• Improving Task Generalization via Unified Schema Prompt [87.31158568180514]
  Unified Prompt is a flexible and prompting method, which automatically customizes the learnable prompts for each task according to the task input schema. It models the shared knowledge between tasks, while keeping the characteristics of different task schema. The framework achieves strong zero-shot and few-shot performance on 16 unseen tasks downstream from 8 task types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T15:26:36Z)
• Benchmarking Generalization via In-Context Instructions on 1,600+ Language Tasks [95.06087720086133]
  Natural-Instructions v2 is a collection of 1,600+ diverse language tasks and their expert written instructions. The benchmark covers 70+ distinct task types, such as tagging, in-filling, and rewriting. This benchmark enables large-scale evaluation of cross-task generalization of the models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T03:12:30Z)
• InstructionNER: A Multi-Task Instruction-Based Generative Framework for Few-shot NER [31.32381919473188]
  We propose a multi-task instruction-based generative framework, named InstructionNER, for low-resource named entity recognition. Specifically, we reformulate the NER task as a generation problem, which enriches source sentences with task-specific instructions and answer options, then inferences the entities and types in natural language. Experimental results show that our method consistently outperforms other baselines on five datasets in few-shot settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T07:56:36Z)
• Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
  We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing. Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z)
• CINS: Comprehensive Instruction for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented Dialog Systems [56.302581679816775]
  This paper proposes Comprehensive Instruction (CINS) that exploits PLMs with task-specific instructions. We design a schema (definition, constraint, prompt) of instructions and their customized realizations for three important downstream tasks in ToD. Experiments are conducted on these ToD tasks in realistic few-shot learning scenarios with small validation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T03:23:06Z)
• Learning from Task Descriptions [24.588252048132862]
  We introduce a framework for developing NLP systems that solve new tasks after reading their descriptions. We instantiate this framework with a new English language dataset, ZEST, structured for task-oriented evaluation. We find that the state-of-the-art T5 model achieves a score of 12% on ZEST, leaving a significant challenge for NLP researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T17:25:24Z)
• Towards Improved Model Design for Authorship Identification: A Survey on Writing Style Understanding [30.642840676899734]
  Authorship identification tasks rely heavily on linguistic styles. Traditional machine learning methods based on handcrafted feature sets are already approaching their performance limits. We describe outstanding methods in style-related tasks in general and analyze how they are used in combination in the top-performing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:17:42Z)
• Adaptive Procedural Task Generation for Hard-Exploration Problems [78.20918366839399]
  We introduce Adaptive Procedural Task Generation (APT-Gen) to facilitate reinforcement learning in hard-exploration problems. At the heart of our approach is a task generator that learns to create tasks from a parameterized task space via a black-box procedural generation module. To enable curriculum learning in the absence of a direct indicator of learning progress, we propose to train the task generator by balancing the agent's performance in the generated tasks and the similarity to the target tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-01T09:38:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.