Code Compass: A Study on the Challenges of Navigating Unfamiliar Codebases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06271v1
• Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 06:58:31 GMT
• Title: Code Compass: A Study on the Challenges of Navigating Unfamiliar Codebases
• Authors: Ekansh Agrawal, Omair Alam, Chetan Goenka, Medha Iyer, Isabela Moise, Ashish Pandian, Bren Paul,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel tool, Code, to address these issues. Our study highlights a significant gap in current tools and methodologies. Our formative study demonstrates how effectively the tool reduces the time developers spend navigating documentation.
• Score: 2.808331566391181
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In our research, we investigate the challenges that software engineers face during program comprehension, particularly when debugging unfamiliar codebases. We propose a novel tool, CodeCompass, to address these issues. Our study highlights a significant gap in current tools and methodologies, especially the difficulty developers encounter in effectively utilizing documentation alongside code exploration. CodeCompass tackles these challenges by seamlessly integrating documentation within the IDE, offering context-aware suggestions and visualizations that streamline the debugging process. Our formative study demonstrates how effectively the tool reduces the time developers spend navigating documentation, thereby enhancing code comprehension and task completion rates. Future work will focus on automating the process of annotating codebases, creating sandbox tasks, and providing dynamic support. These innovations could potentially transform software development practices by improving the accessibility and efficiency of program comprehension tools.

Related papers

• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• No Man is an Island: Towards Fully Automatic Programming by Code Search, Code Generation and Program Repair [9.562123938545522]
  toolname can integrate various code search, generation, and repair tools, combining these three research areas together for the first time. We conduct preliminary experiments to demonstrate the potential of our framework, eg helping CodeLlama solve 267 programming problems with an improvement of 62.53%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T06:24:29Z)
• Creating a Trajectory for Code Writing: Algorithmic Reasoning Tasks [0.923607423080658]
  This paper describes instruments and the machine learning models used for validating them. We have used the data collected in an introductory programming course in the penultimate week of the semester. Preliminary research suggests ART type instruments can be combined with specific machine learning models to act as an effective learning trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-03T05:07:01Z)
• DevBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Software Development [72.24266814625685]
  DevBench is a benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) across various stages of the software development lifecycle. Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4-Turbo, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevBench. Our findings offer actionable insights for the future development of LLMs toward real-world programming applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software Visualization [49.1574468325115]
  The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools. This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z)
• Collaborative, Code-Proximal Dynamic Software Visualization within Code Editors [55.57032418885258]
  This paper introduces the design and proof-of-concept implementation for a software visualization approach that can be embedded into code editors. Our contribution differs from related work in that we use dynamic analysis of a software system's runtime behavior. Our visualization approach enhances common remote pair programming tools and is collaboratively usable by employing shared code cities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T06:35:40Z)
• "It's Weird That it Knows What I Want": Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers [5.317693153442043]
  We present the first study that observes students at the introductory level using one such code auto-generating tool, Github Copilot, on a typical programming assignment. We explore student perceptions of the benefits and pitfalls of this technology for learning, present new observed interaction patterns, and discuss cognitive and metacognitive difficulties faced by students.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T15:07:50Z)
• A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges [23.467373994306524]
  In practice, developers do not accept AI programming assistants' initial suggestions at a high frequency. To understand developers' practices while using these tools, we administered a survey to a large population of developers. We found that developers are most motivated to use AI programming assistants because they help developers reduce key-strokes, finish programming tasks quickly, and recall syntax. We also found the most important reasons why developers do not use these tools are because these tools do not output code that addresses certain functional or non-functional requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T03:21:53Z)
• Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions [54.55334589363247]
  We study whether conveying information about uncertainty enables programmers to more quickly and accurately produce code. We find that highlighting tokens with the highest predicted likelihood of being edited leads to faster task completion and more targeted edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:43:34Z)
• Chatbots As Fluent Polyglots: Revisiting Breakthrough Code Snippets [0.0]
  The research applies AI-driven code assistants to analyze a selection of influential computer code that has shaped modern technology. The original contribution of this study was to examine half of the most significant code advances in the last 50 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-05T23:17:17Z)
• ReACC: A Retrieval-Augmented Code Completion Framework [53.49707123661763]
  We propose a retrieval-augmented code completion framework, leveraging both lexical copying and referring to code with similar semantics by retrieval. We evaluate our approach in the code completion task in Python and Java programming languages, achieving a state-of-the-art performance on CodeXGLUE benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T08:25:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.