A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.17125v2
• Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 04:36:05 GMT
• Title: A Large-Scale Survey on the Usability of AI Programming Assistants: Successes and Challenges
• Authors: Jenny T. Liang, Chenyang Yang, Brad A. Myers
• Abstract summary: In practice, developers do not accept AI programming assistants' initial suggestions at a high frequency. To understand developers' practices while using these tools, we administered a survey to a large population of developers. We found that developers are most motivated to use AI programming assistants because they help developers reduce key-strokes, finish programming tasks quickly, and recall syntax. We also found the most important reasons why developers do not use these tools are because these tools do not output code that addresses certain functional or non-functional requirements.
• Score: 23.467373994306524
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The software engineering community recently has witnessed widespread deployment of AI programming assistants, such as GitHub Copilot. However, in practice, developers do not accept AI programming assistants' initial suggestions at a high frequency. This leaves a number of open questions related to the usability of these tools. To understand developers' practices while using these tools and the important usability challenges they face, we administered a survey to a large population of developers and received responses from a diverse set of 410 developers. Through a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses, we found that developers are most motivated to use AI programming assistants because they help developers reduce key-strokes, finish programming tasks quickly, and recall syntax, but resonate less with using them to help brainstorm potential solutions. We also found the most important reasons why developers do not use these tools are because these tools do not output code that addresses certain functional or non-functional requirements and because developers have trouble controlling the tool to generate the desired output. Our findings have implications for both creators and users of AI programming assistants, such as designing minimal cognitive effort interactions with these tools to reduce distractions for users while they are programming.

Related papers

• ToolCoder: A Systematic Code-Empowered Tool Learning Framework for Large Language Models [49.04652315815501]
  Tool learning has emerged as a crucial capability for large language models (LLMs) to solve complex real-world tasks through interaction with external tools. We propose ToolCoder, a novel framework that reformulates tool learning as a code generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T03:42:28Z)
• Towards Decoding Developer Cognition in the Age of AI Assistants [9.887133861477233]
  We propose a controlled observational study combining physiological measurements (EEG and eye tracking) with interaction data to examine developers' use of AI-assisted programming tools. We will recruit professional developers to complete programming tasks both with and without AI assistance while measuring their cognitive load and task completion time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T23:25:21Z)
• Darkit: A User-Friendly Software Toolkit for Spiking Large Language Model [50.37090759139591]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been widely applied in various practical applications, typically comprising billions of parameters. The human brain, employing bio-plausible spiking mechanisms, can accomplish the same tasks while significantly reducing energy consumption. We are releasing a software toolkit named DarwinKit (Darkit) to accelerate the adoption of brain-inspired large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T07:50:08Z)
• Dear Diary: A randomized controlled trial of Generative AI coding tools in the workplace [2.5280615594444567]
  Generative AI coding tools are relatively new, and their impact on developers extends beyond traditional coding metrics. This study aims to illuminate developers' preexisting beliefs about generative AI tools, their self perceptions, and how regular use of these tools may alter these beliefs. Our findings reveal that the introduction and sustained use of generative AI coding tools significantly increases developers' perceptions of these tools as both useful and enjoyable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T00:07:27Z)
• Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forward [9.177785129949]
  We aim to better understand how specifically developers are using AI assistants. We carried out a large-scale survey aimed at how AI assistants are used.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T23:10:43Z)
• Code Compass: A Study on the Challenges of Navigating Unfamiliar Codebases [2.808331566391181]
  We propose a novel tool, Code, to address these issues. Our study highlights a significant gap in current tools and methodologies. Our formative study demonstrates how effectively the tool reduces the time developers spend navigating documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T06:58:31Z)
• Developer Experiences with a Contextualized AI Coding Assistant: Usability, Expectations, and Outcomes [11.520721038793285]
  This study focuses on the initial experiences of 62 participants who used a contextualized coding AI assistant -- named StackSpot AI -- in a controlled setting. Assistants' use resulted in significant time savings, easier access to documentation, and the generation of accurate codes for internal APIs. challenges associated with the knowledge sources necessary to make the coding assistant access more contextual information as well as variable responses and limitations in handling complex codes were observed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T10:52:28Z)
• The GitHub Development Workflow Automation Ecosystems [47.818229204130596]
  Large-scale software development has become a highly collaborative endeavour. This chapter explores the ecosystems of development bots and GitHub Actions. It provides an extensive survey of the state-of-the-art in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T15:24:23Z)
• LLM-based Interaction for Content Generation: A Case Study on the Perception of Employees in an IT department [85.1523466539595]
  This paper presents a questionnaire survey to identify the intention to use generative tools by employees of an IT company. Our results indicate a rather average acceptability of generative tools, although the more useful the tool is perceived to be, the higher the intention seems to be. Our analyses suggest that the frequency of use of generative tools is likely to be a key factor in understanding how employees perceive these tools in the context of their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T15:35:43Z)
• Generation Probabilities Are Not Enough: Uncertainty Highlighting in AI Code Completions [54.55334589363247]
  We study whether conveying information about uncertainty enables programmers to more quickly and accurately produce code. We find that highlighting tokens with the highest predicted likelihood of being edited leads to faster task completion and more targeted edits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T18:43:34Z)
• Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode [74.87216298566942]
  We introduce AlphaCode, a system for code generation that can create novel solutions to problems that require deeper reasoning. In simulated evaluations on recent programming competitions on the Codeforces platform, AlphaCode achieved on average a ranking of top 54.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T23:16:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.