Analyzing Language Bias Between French and English in Conventional Multilingual Sentiment Analysis Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06692v1
• Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 17:46:36 GMT
• Title: Analyzing Language Bias Between French and English in Conventional Multilingual Sentiment Analysis Models
• Abstract summary: Given a 50-50 dataset of French and English, we aim to determine if there exists a language bias. By employing Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes models on three balanced datasets, we reveal potential biases in multilingual sentiment classification.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Inspired by the 'Bias Considerations in Bilingual Natural Language Processing' report by Statistics Canada, this study delves into potential biases in multilingual sentiment analysis between English and French. Given a 50-50 dataset of French and English, we aim to determine if there exists a language bias and explore how the incorporation of more diverse datasets in the future might affect the equity of multilingual Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems. By employing Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Naive Bayes models on three balanced datasets, we reveal potential biases in multilingual sentiment classification. Utilizing Fairlearn, a tool for assessing bias in machine learning models, our findings indicate nuanced outcomes. With French data outperforming English across accuracy, recall, and F1 score metrics in both models, hinting at a language bias favoring French. However, Fairlearn's metrics suggest that the SVM approaches equitable levels with a demographic parity ratio of 0.963, 0.989, and 0.985 for the three separate datasets, indicating near-equitable treatment across languages. In contrast, Naive Bayes demonstrates greater disparities, evidenced by a demographic parity ratio of 0.813, 0.908, and 0.961. These findings reveal the importance of developing equitable multilingual NLP systems, particularly as we anticipate the inclusion of more datasets in various languages in the future.

Related papers

• Can Embedding Similarity Predict Cross-Lingual Transfer? A Systematic Study on African Languages [12.074798555934855]
  Cross-lingual transfer is essential for building NLP systems for low-resource African languages.<n>We systematically evaluate five embedding similarity metrics across 816 transfer experiments.<n>We find that cosine gap and retrieval-based metrics reliably predict transfer success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T16:39:28Z)
• Revisiting Multilingual Data Mixtures in Language Model Pretraining [20.282622416939997]
  We study the impact of different multilingual data mixtures in pretraining large language models.<n>We find that combining English and multilingual data does not necessarily degrade the in-language performance of either group.<n>We do not observe a significant "curse of multilinguality" as the number of training languages increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T20:46:03Z)
• Adapting Language Models to Indonesian Local Languages: An Empirical Study of Language Transferability on Zero-Shot Settings [1.1556013985948772]
  We evaluate transferability of pre-trained language models to low-resource Indonesian local languages.<n>We group the target languages into three categories: seen, partially seen, and unseen.<n> Multilingual models perform best on seen languages, moderately on partially seen ones, and poorly on unseen languages.<n>We find that MAD-X significantly improves performance, especially for seen and partially seen languages, without requiring labeled data in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T12:17:55Z)
• Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models [55.14276067678253]
  This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models.<n>Further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-24T12:31:27Z)
• Filipino Benchmarks for Measuring Sexist and Homophobic Bias in Multilingual Language Models from Southeast Asia [0.3376269351435396]
  We introduce benchmarks that assess both sexist and anti-queer biases in pretrained language models handling texts in Filipino. The benchmarks consist of 7,074 new challenge pairs resulting from our cultural adaptation of English bias evaluation datasets. We find that for multilingual models, the extent of bias learned for a particular language is influenced by how much pretraining data in that language a model was exposed to.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T08:31:52Z)
• Do Multilingual Large Language Models Mitigate Stereotype Bias? [9.31741279000585]
  This study systematically trains six LLMs of identical size and architecture in English, German, French, Italian, and Spanish. We observe that multilingual models achieve not only lower bias but also superior prediction accuracy when compared to monolingual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T08:46:50Z)
• CroissantLLM: A Truly Bilingual French-English Language Model [42.03897426049679]
  We introduce CroissantLLM, a 1.3B language model pretrained on a set of 3T English and French tokens. We pioneer the approach of training an intrinsically bilingual model with a 1:1 English-to-French pretraining data ratio. To assess performance outside of English, we craft a novel benchmark, FrenchBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:17:55Z)
• GradSim: Gradient-Based Language Grouping for Effective Multilingual Training [13.730907708289331]
  We propose GradSim, a language grouping method based on gradient similarity. Our experiments on three diverse multilingual benchmark datasets show that it leads to the largest performance gains. Besides linguistic features, the topics of the datasets play an important role for language grouping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:13:37Z)
• The Belebele Benchmark: a Parallel Reading Comprehension Dataset in 122 Language Variants [80.4837840962273]
  We present Belebele, a dataset spanning 122 language variants. This dataset enables the evaluation of text models in high-, medium-, and low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T17:43:08Z)
• Cross-Lingual NER for Financial Transaction Data in Low-Resource Languages [70.25418443146435]
  We propose an efficient modeling framework for cross-lingual named entity recognition in semi-structured text data. We employ two independent datasets of SMSs in English and Arabic, each carrying semi-structured banking transaction information. With access to only 30 labeled samples, our model can generalize the recognition of merchants, amounts, and other fields from English to Arabic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T00:45:42Z)
• An Open Dataset and Model for Language Identification [84.15194457400253]
  We present a LID model which achieves a macro-average F1 score of 0.93 and a false positive rate of 0.033 across 201 languages. We make both the model and the dataset available to the research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T08:43:42Z)
• DN at SemEval-2023 Task 12: Low-Resource Language Text Classification via Multilingual Pretrained Language Model Fine-tuning [0.0]
  Most existing models and datasets for sentiment analysis are developed for high-resource languages, such as English and Chinese. The AfriSenti-SemEval 2023 Shared Task 12 aims to fill this gap by evaluating sentiment analysis models on low-resource African languages. We present our solution to the shared task, where we employed different multilingual XLM-R models with classification head trained on various data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T07:28:45Z)
• A Commonsense-Infused Language-Agnostic Learning Framework for Enhancing Prediction of Political Polarity in Multilingual News Headlines [0.0]
  We use the method of translation and retrieval to acquire the inferential knowledge in the target language. We then employ an attention mechanism to emphasise important inferences. We present a dataset of over 62.6K multilingual news headlines in five European languages annotated with their respective political polarities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T06:07:01Z)
• Language Contamination Explains the Cross-lingual Capabilities of English Pretrained Models [79.38278330678965]
  We find that common English pretraining corpora contain significant amounts of non-English text. This leads to hundreds of millions of foreign language tokens in large-scale datasets. We then demonstrate that even these small percentages of non-English data facilitate cross-lingual transfer for models trained on them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T23:56:54Z)
• AmericasNLI: Evaluating Zero-shot Natural Language Understanding of Pretrained Multilingual Models in Truly Low-resource Languages [75.08199398141744]
  We present AmericasNLI, an extension of XNLI (Conneau et al.), to 10 indigenous languages of the Americas. We conduct experiments with XLM-R, testing multiple zero-shot and translation-based approaches. We find that XLM-R's zero-shot performance is poor for all 10 languages, with an average performance of 38.62%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T05:32:28Z)
• Explicit Alignment Objectives for Multilingual Bidirectional Encoders [111.65322283420805]
  We present a new method for learning multilingual encoders, AMBER (Aligned Multilingual Bi-directional EncodeR) AMBER is trained on additional parallel data using two explicit alignment objectives that align the multilingual representations at different granularities. Experimental results show that AMBER obtains gains of up to 1.1 average F1 score on sequence tagging and up to 27.3 average accuracy on retrieval over the XLMR-large model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T18:34:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.