Catastrophe Insurance: An Adaptive Robust Optimization Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07068v1
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 18:35:54 GMT
- Title: Catastrophe Insurance: An Adaptive Robust Optimization Approach
- Authors: Dimitris Bertsimas, Cynthia Zeng,
- Abstract summary: This work introduces a novel Adaptive Robust Optimization framework tailored for the calculation of catastrophe insurance premiums.
To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time an ARO approach has been applied to disaster insurance pricing.
Using the US flood insurance data as a case study, optimization models demonstrate effectiveness in covering losses and produce surpluses.
- Score: 5.877778007271621
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: The escalating frequency and severity of natural disasters, exacerbated by climate change, underscore the critical role of insurance in facilitating recovery and promoting investments in risk reduction. This work introduces a novel Adaptive Robust Optimization (ARO) framework tailored for the calculation of catastrophe insurance premiums, with a case study applied to the United States National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time an ARO approach has been applied to for disaster insurance pricing. Our methodology is designed to protect against both historical and emerging risks, the latter predicted by machine learning models, thus directly incorporating amplified risks induced by climate change. Using the US flood insurance data as a case study, optimization models demonstrate effectiveness in covering losses and produce surpluses, with a smooth balance transition through parameter fine-tuning. Among tested optimization models, results show ARO models with conservative parameter values achieving low number of insolvent states with the least insurance premium charged. Overall, optimization frameworks offer versatility and generalizability, making it adaptable to a variety of natural disaster scenarios, such as wildfires, droughts, etc. This work not only advances the field of insurance premium modeling but also serves as a vital tool for policymakers and stakeholders in building resilience to the growing risks of natural catastrophes.
Related papers
- Representation-based Reward Modeling for Efficient Safety Alignment of Large Language Model [84.00480999255628]
Reinforcement Learning algorithms for safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) encounter the challenge of distribution shift.
Current approaches typically address this issue through online sampling from the target policy.
We propose a new framework that leverages the model's intrinsic safety judgment capability to extract reward signals.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-13T06:40:34Z) - Efficient Risk-sensitive Planning via Entropic Risk Measures [51.42922439693624]
We show that only Entropic Risk Measures (EntRM) can be efficiently optimized through dynamic programming.
We prove that this optimality front can be computed effectively thanks to a novel structural analysis and smoothness properties of entropic risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-27T09:56:51Z) - A Hybrid Framework for Reinsurance Optimization: Integrating Generative Models and Reinforcement Learning [0.0]
Reinsurance optimization is critical for insurers to manage risk exposure, ensure financial stability, and maintain solvency.
Traditional approaches often struggle with dynamic claim distributions, high-dimensional constraints, and evolving market conditions.
This paper introduces a novel hybrid framework that integrates generative models and reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-11T02:02:32Z) - HurriCast: Synthetic Tropical Cyclone Track Generation for Hurricane Forecasting [5.314981748001983]
The generation of synthetic tropical cyclone(TC) tracks for risk assessment is a critical application of preparedness for the impacts of climate change and disaster relief, particularly in North America.<n>For governments and policymakers, understanding the potential impacts of TCs helps in developing effective emergency response strategies, updating building codes, and prioritizing investments in resilience and mitigation projects.<n>A hybrid methodology, combining the ARIMA and K-MEANS methods with Autoencoder, is employed to capture better historical TC behaviors and project future trajectories and intensities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-12T19:48:52Z) - Domain Generalization without Excess Empirical Risk [83.26052467843725]
A common approach is designing a data-driven surrogate penalty to capture generalization and minimize the empirical risk jointly with the penalty.
We argue that a significant failure mode of this recipe is an excess risk due to an erroneous penalty or hardness in joint optimization.
We present an approach that eliminates this problem. Instead of jointly minimizing empirical risk with the penalty, we minimize the penalty under the constraint of optimality of the empirical risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T08:46:46Z) - SafeAR: Safe Algorithmic Recourse by Risk-Aware Policies [2.291948092032746]
We present a method to compute recourse policies that consider variability in cost.
We show how existing recourse desiderata can fail to capture the risk of higher costs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T18:12:11Z) - A Counterfactual Safety Margin Perspective on the Scoring of Autonomous
Vehicles' Riskiness [52.27309191283943]
This paper presents a data-driven framework for assessing the risk of different AVs' behaviors.
We propose the notion of counterfactual safety margin, which represents the minimum deviation from nominal behavior that could cause a collision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-02T09:48:08Z) - Safe Deployment for Counterfactual Learning to Rank with Exposure-Based
Risk Minimization [63.93275508300137]
We introduce a novel risk-aware Counterfactual Learning To Rank method with theoretical guarantees for safe deployment.
Our experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method, which is effective at avoiding initial periods of bad performance when little data is available.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-26T15:54:23Z) - Prediction of Auto Insurance Risk Based on t-SNE Dimensionality
Reduction [0.0]
We develop a framework based on a combination of a neural network together with a dimensionality reduction technique t-SNE.
The obtained results, which are based on real insurance data, reveal a clear contrast between the high and low risk policy holders.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-19T11:50:18Z) - Learning Inter-Annual Flood Loss Risk Models From Historical Flood
Insurance Claims and Extreme Rainfall Data [0.0]
Flooding is one of the most disastrous natural hazards, responsible for substantial economic losses.
This research assesses the predictive capability of regressors constructed on the National Flood Insurance Program dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-15T19:23:02Z) - Efficient Risk-Averse Reinforcement Learning [79.61412643761034]
In risk-averse reinforcement learning (RL), the goal is to optimize some risk measure of the returns.
We prove that under certain conditions this inevitably leads to a local-optimum barrier, and propose a soft risk mechanism to bypass it.
We demonstrate improved risk aversion in maze navigation, autonomous driving, and resource allocation benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T19:40:52Z) - Holdouts set for predictive model updating [0.9749560288448114]
Updating risk scores can lead to biased risk estimates.
We propose using a holdout set' - a subset of the population that does not receive interventions guided by the risk score.
We prove that this approach enables total costs to grow at a rate $Oleft(N2/3right)$ for a population of size $N$, and argue that in general circumstances there is no competitive alternative.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-13T18:04:00Z) - Risk Minimization from Adaptively Collected Data: Guarantees for
Supervised and Policy Learning [57.88785630755165]
Empirical risk minimization (ERM) is the workhorse of machine learning, but its model-agnostic guarantees can fail when we use adaptively collected data.
We study a generic importance sampling weighted ERM algorithm for using adaptively collected data to minimize the average of a loss function over a hypothesis class.
For policy learning, we provide rate-optimal regret guarantees that close an open gap in the existing literature whenever exploration decays to zero.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-03T09:50:13Z) - Cautious Adaptation For Reinforcement Learning in Safety-Critical
Settings [129.80279257258098]
Reinforcement learning (RL) in real-world safety-critical target settings like urban driving is hazardous.
We propose a "safety-critical adaptation" task setting: an agent first trains in non-safety-critical "source" environments.
We propose a solution approach, CARL, that builds on the intuition that prior experience in diverse environments equips an agent to estimate risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-15T01:40:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.