A Hybrid Framework for Reinsurance Optimization: Integrating Generative Models and Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.06404v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 02:02:32 GMT
• Title: A Hybrid Framework for Reinsurance Optimization: Integrating Generative Models and Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Stella C. Dong, James R. Finlay,
• Abstract summary: Reinsurance optimization is critical for insurers to manage risk exposure, ensure financial stability, and maintain solvency. Traditional approaches often struggle with dynamic claim distributions, high-dimensional constraints, and evolving market conditions. This paper introduces a novel hybrid framework that integrates generative models and reinforcement learning.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Reinsurance optimization is critical for insurers to manage risk exposure, ensure financial stability, and maintain solvency. Traditional approaches often struggle with dynamic claim distributions, high-dimensional constraints, and evolving market conditions. This paper introduces a novel hybrid framework that integrates {Generative Models}, specifically Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), with {Reinforcement Learning (RL)} using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The framework enables dynamic and scalable optimization of reinsurance strategies by combining the generative modeling of complex claim distributions with the adaptive decision-making capabilities of reinforcement learning. The VAE component generates synthetic claims, including rare and catastrophic events, addressing data scarcity and variability, while the PPO algorithm dynamically adjusts reinsurance parameters to maximize surplus and minimize ruin probability. The framework's performance is validated through extensive experiments, including out-of-sample testing, stress-testing scenarios (e.g., pandemic impacts, catastrophic events), and scalability analysis across portfolio sizes. Results demonstrate its superior adaptability, scalability, and robustness compared to traditional optimization techniques, achieving higher final surpluses and computational efficiency. Key contributions include the development of a hybrid approach for high-dimensional optimization, dynamic reinsurance parameterization, and validation against stochastic claim distributions. The proposed framework offers a transformative solution for modern reinsurance challenges, with potential applications in multi-line insurance operations, catastrophe modeling, and risk-sharing strategy design.

Related papers

• Risk-Averse Certification of Bayesian Neural Networks [70.44969603471903]
  We propose a Risk-Averse Certification framework for Bayesian neural networks called RAC-BNN. Our method leverages sampling and optimisation to compute a sound approximation of the output set of a BNN. We validate RAC-BNN on a range of regression and classification benchmarks and compare its performance with a state-of-the-art method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T14:22:51Z)
• Generalization Bounds of Surrogate Policies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [61.580419063416734]
  A recent stream of structured learning approaches has improved the practical state of the art for a range of optimization problems. The key idea is to exploit the statistical distribution over instances instead of dealing with instances separately. In this article, we investigate methods that smooth the risk by perturbing the policy, which eases optimization and improves the generalization error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T12:00:30Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences. To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model. Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• End-to-end Conditional Robust Optimization [6.363653898208231]
  Conditional Robust Optimization (CRO) combines uncertainty quantification with robust optimization to promote safety and reliability in high stake applications. We propose a novel end-to-end approach to train a CRO model in a way that accounts for both the empirical risk of the prescribed decisions and the quality of conditional coverage of the contextual uncertainty set that supports them. We show that the proposed training algorithms produce decisions that outperform the traditional estimate then optimize approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T17:16:59Z)
• Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement learning [7.023335262537794]
  This paper introduces reinforcement learning framework that learns optimal pricing policy by integrating model-based and model-free methods. The paper also highlights the importance of evaluating pricing policies using an offline dataset in a consistent fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-14T04:44:56Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)
• Revisiting GANs by Best-Response Constraint: Perspective, Methodology, and Application [49.66088514485446]
  Best-Response Constraint (BRC) is a general learning framework to explicitly formulate the potential dependency of the generator on the discriminator. We show that even with different motivations and formulations, a variety of existing GANs ALL can be uniformly improved by our flexible BRC methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T12:42:41Z)
• A Probabilistic Forecast-Driven Strategy for a Risk-Aware Participation in the Capacity Firming Market [30.828362290032935]
  This paper addresses the energy management of a grid-connected renewable generation plant and a battery energy storage device in the capacity firming market. A recently developed deep learning model known as normalizing flows is used to generate quantile forecasts of renewable generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T13:13:07Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Neural Mixture Distributional Regression [0.9023847175654603]
  We present a holistic framework to estimate finite mixtures of distributional regressions defined by flexible additive predictors. Our framework is able to handle a large number of mixtures of potentially different distributions in high-dimensional settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T09:00:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.