Designing and Evaluating Dialogue LLMs for Co-Creative Improvised Theatre

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07111v1
• Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 23:19:42 GMT
• Title: Designing and Evaluating Dialogue LLMs for Co-Creative Improvised Theatre
• Authors: Boyd Branch, Piotr Mirowski, Kory Mathewson, Sophia Ppali, Alexandra Covaci,
• Abstract summary: This study presents Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in a month-long live show at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. We explore the technical capabilities and constraints of on-the-spot multi-party dialogue. Our human-in-the-loop methodology underlines the challenges of these LLMs in generating context-relevant responses.
• Score: 48.19823828240628
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social robotics researchers are increasingly interested in multi-party trained conversational agents. With a growing demand for real-world evaluations, our study presents Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in a month-long live show at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. This case study investigates human improvisers co-creating with conversational agents in a professional theatre setting. We explore the technical capabilities and constraints of on-the-spot multi-party dialogue, providing comprehensive insights from both audience and performer experiences with AI on stage. Our human-in-the-loop methodology underlines the challenges of these LLMs in generating context-relevant responses, stressing the user interface's crucial role. Audience feedback indicates an evolving interest for AI-driven live entertainment, direct human-AI interaction, and a diverse range of expectations about AI's conversational competence and utility as a creativity support tool. Human performers express immense enthusiasm, varied satisfaction, and the evolving public opinion highlights mixed emotions about AI's role in arts.

Related papers

• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.74265453289855]
  Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces. This paper examines the affordances of interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface, analysing how they shape user input and participation in iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z)
• Empathy Through Multimodality in Conversational Interfaces [1.360649555639909]
  Conversational Health Agents (CHAs) are redefining healthcare by offering nuanced support that transcends textual analysis to incorporate emotional intelligence. This paper introduces an LLM-based CHA engineered for rich, multimodal dialogue-especially in the realm of mental health support. It adeptly interprets and responds to users' emotional states by analyzing multimodal cues, thus delivering contextually aware and empathetically resonant verbal responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T02:48:29Z)
• Persona Inconstancy in Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration: Conformity, Confabulation, and Impersonation [16.82101507069166]
  Multi-agent AI systems can be used for simulating collective decision-making in scientific and practical applications. We examine AI agent ensembles engaged in cross-national collaboration and debate by analyzing their private responses and chat transcripts. Our findings suggest that multi-agent discussions can support collective AI decisions that more often reflect diverse perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T21:20:35Z)
• From Persona to Personalization: A Survey on Role-Playing Language Agents [52.783043059715546]
  Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have boosted the rise of Role-Playing Language Agents (RPLAs) RPLAs achieve a remarkable sense of human likeness and vivid role-playing performance. They have catalyzed numerous AI applications, such as emotional companions, interactive video games, personalized assistants and copilots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T15:56:41Z)
• Building Emotional Support Chatbots in the Era of LLMs [64.06811786616471]
  We introduce an innovative methodology that synthesizes human insights with the computational prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs) By utilizing the in-context learning potential of ChatGPT, we generate an ExTensible Emotional Support dialogue dataset, named ExTES. Following this, we deploy advanced tuning techniques on the LLaMA model, examining the impact of diverse training strategies, ultimately yielding an LLM meticulously optimized for emotional support interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-17T10:49:18Z)
• A Survey on Proactive Dialogue Systems: Problems, Methods, and Prospects [100.75759050696355]
  We provide a comprehensive overview of the prominent problems and advanced designs for conversational agent's proactivity in different types of dialogues. We discuss challenges that meet the real-world application needs but require a greater research focus in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T11:38:49Z)
• Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback [42.19685958922537]
  We argue that human-AI collaboration should be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T05:37:59Z)
• Human in the Loop for Machine Creativity [0.0]
  We conceptualize existing and future human-in-the-loop (HITL) approaches for creative applications. We examine and speculate on long term implications for models, interfaces, and machine creativity. We envision multimodal HITL processes, where texts, visuals, sounds, and other information are coupled together, with automated analysis of humans and environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T15:42:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.