Machine Consciousness as Pseudoscience: The Myth of Conscious Machines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.07340v1
• Date: Sun, 12 May 2024 17:30:48 GMT
• Title: Machine Consciousness as Pseudoscience: The Myth of Conscious Machines
• Authors: Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán,
• Abstract summary: We argue how machine consciousness literature lacks scientific rigour, being impossible to falsify the opposite hypothesis. We also show how phenomenal consciousness is not computable, independently on the complexity of the algorithm or model. Given all those arguments we end the work arguing why the idea of conscious machines is nowadays a myth of transhumanism and science fiction culture.
• Score: 2.3931689873603603
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The hypothesis of conscious machines has been debated since the invention of the notion of artificial intelligence, powered by the assumption that the computational intelligence achieved by a system is the cause of the emergence of phenomenal consciousness in that system as an epiphenomenon or as a consequence of the behavioral or internal complexity of the system surpassing some threshold. As a consequence, a huge amount of literature exploring the possibility of machine consciousness and how to implement it on a computer has been published. Moreover, common folk psychology and transhumanism literature has fed this hypothesis with the popularity of science fiction literature, where intelligent robots are usually antropomorphized and hence given phenomenal consciousness. However, in this work, we argue how these literature lacks scientific rigour, being impossible to falsify the opposite hypothesis, and illustrate a list of arguments that show how every approach that the machine consciousness literature has published depends on philosophical assumptions that cannot be proven by the scientific method. Concretely, we also show how phenomenal consciousness is not computable, independently on the complexity of the algorithm or model, cannot be objectively measured nor quantitatively defined and it is basically a phenomenon that is subjective and internal to the observer. Given all those arguments we end the work arguing why the idea of conscious machines is nowadays a myth of transhumanism and science fiction culture.

Related papers

• On a heuristic approach to the description of consciousness as a hypercomplex system state and the possibility of machine consciousness (German edition) [0.0]
  This article shows that the inner states of consciousness experienced by every human being have a physical but imaginary hypercomplex basis. Based on theoretical considerations, it could be possible - as a result of mathematical investigations into a so-called bicomplex algebra - to generate and use hypercomplex system states on machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T17:55:57Z)
• Can a Machine be Conscious? Towards Universal Criteria for Machine Consciousness [0.0]
  Many concerns have been voiced about the ramifications of creating an artificial conscious entity. This is compounded by a marked lack of consensus around what constitutes consciousness. We propose five criteria for determining whether a machine is conscious.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T18:38:22Z)
• Artificial consciousness. Some logical and conceptual preliminaries [0.0]
  We argue for the necessity of using dimensions and profiles of consciousness for a balanced discussion about their possible instantiation or realisation in artificial systems. Our primary goal in this paper is to review the main theoretical questions that arise in the domain of artificial consciousness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T13:47:47Z)
• A Review of Neuroscience-Inspired Machine Learning [58.72729525961739]
  Bio-plausible credit assignment is compatible with practically any learning condition and is energy-efficient. In this paper, we survey several vital algorithms that model bio-plausible rules of credit assignment in artificial neural networks. We conclude by discussing the future challenges that will need to be addressed in order to make such algorithms more useful in practical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T18:05:09Z)
• AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
  Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
• A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
  Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images. We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z)
• Survey of Consciousness Theory from Computational Perspective [8.521492577054078]
  This paper surveys several main branches of consciousness theories originating from different subjects. It also discusses the existing evaluation metrics of consciousness and possibility for current computational models to be conscious.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T18:23:58Z)
• Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• Reliable AI: Does the Next Generation Require Quantum Computing? [71.84486326350338]
  We show that digital hardware is inherently constrained in solving problems about optimization, deep learning, or differential equations. In contrast, analog computing models, such as the Blum-Shub-Smale machine, exhibit the potential to surmount these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T19:10:45Z)
• On the independence between phenomenal consciousness and computational intelligence [0.0]
  We argue in this paper how phenomenal consciousness and, at least, computational intelligence are independent. As phenomenal consciousness and computational intelligence are independent, this fact has critical implications for society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-03T16:17:11Z)
• Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
  A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.