Discursive objection strategies in online comments: Developing a classification schema and validating its training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08142v1
• Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 19:39:00 GMT
• Title: Discursive objection strategies in online comments: Developing a classification schema and validating its training
• Authors: Ashley L. Shea, Aspen K. B. Omapang, Ji Yong Cho, Miryam Y. Ginsparg, Natalie Bazarova, Winice Hui, René F. Kizilcec, Chau Tong, Drew Margolin,
• Abstract summary: Most Americans agree that misinformation, hate speech and harassment are harmful and inadequately curbed on social media. We conducted a content analysis of more than 6500 comment replies to trending news videos on YouTube and Twitter. We identified seven distinct discursive objection strategies.
• Score: 2.6603898952678167
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Most Americans agree that misinformation, hate speech and harassment are harmful and inadequately curbed on social media through current moderation practices. In this paper, we aim to understand the discursive strategies employed by people in response to harmful speech in news comments. We conducted a content analysis of more than 6500 comment replies to trending news videos on YouTube and Twitter and identified seven distinct discursive objection strategies (Study 1). We examined the frequency of each strategy's occurrence from the 6500 comment replies, as well as from a second sample of 2004 replies (Study 2). Together, these studies show that people deploy a diversity of discursive strategies when objecting to speech, and reputational attacks are the most common. The resulting classification scheme accounts for different theoretical approaches for expressing objections and offers a comprehensive perspective on grassroots efforts aimed at stopping offensive or problematic speech on campus.

Related papers

• Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management [71.99446449877038]
  We propose a more comprehensive approach called Demarcation scoring abusive speech based on four aspect -- (i) severity scale; (ii) presence of a target; (iii) context scale; (iv) legal scale. Our work aims to inform future strategies for effectively addressing abusive speech online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T21:45:33Z)
• Assessing the impact of contextual information in hate speech detection [0.48369513656026514]
  We provide a novel corpus for contextualized hate speech detection based on user responses to news posts from media outlets on Twitter. This corpus was collected in the Rioplatense dialectal variety of Spanish and focuses on hate speech associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-02T09:04:47Z)
• Projective Ranking-based GNN Evasion Attacks [52.85890533994233]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) offer promising learning methods for graph-related tasks. GNNs are at risk of adversarial attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T21:52:09Z)
• "Stop Asian Hate!" : Refining Detection of Anti-Asian Hate Speech During the COVID-19 Pandemic [2.5227595609842206]
  COVID-19 pandemic has fueled a surge in anti-Asian xenophobia and prejudice. We create and annotate a corpus of Twitter tweets using 2 experimental approaches to explore anti-Asian abusive and hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T06:55:19Z)
• Characterizing the adversarial vulnerability of speech self-supervised learning [95.03389072594243]
  We make the first attempt to investigate the adversarial vulnerability of such paradigm under the attacks from both zero-knowledge adversaries and limited-knowledge adversaries. The experimental results illustrate that the paradigm proposed by SUPERB is seriously vulnerable to limited-knowledge adversaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-08T08:44:04Z)
• Hate Speech Detection in Roman Urdu [1.6436293069942314]
  This study is the first to conduct a study for hate speech detection in Roman Urdu text. We have scrapped more than 90,000 tweets and manually parsed them to identify 5,000 Roman Urdu tweets. We have employed an iterative approach to develop guidelines and used them for generating the Hate Speech Roman Urdu 2020 corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T19:49:46Z)
• Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations on reinforcement learning algorithms. We show that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T15:53:48Z)
• RESPER: Computationally Modelling Resisting Strategies in Persuasive Conversations [0.7505101297221454]
  We propose a generalised framework for identifying resisting strategies in persuasive conversations. Our experiments reveal the asymmetry of power roles in non-collaborative goal-directed conversations. We also investigate the role of different resisting strategies on the conversation outcome.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-26T03:44:17Z)
• Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategies [78.68534915690404]
  StrategyQA is a benchmark where the required reasoning steps are implicit in the question, and should be inferred using a strategy. We propose a data collection procedure that combines term-based priming to inspire annotators, careful control over the annotator population, and adversarial filtering for eliminating reasoning shortcuts. Overall, StrategyQA includes 2,780 examples, each consisting of a strategy question, its decomposition, and evidence paragraphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-06T19:14:23Z)
• Examining the Ordering of Rhetorical Strategies in Persuasive Requests [58.63432866432461]
  We use a Variational Autoencoder model to disentangle content and rhetorical strategies in textual requests from a large-scale loan request corpus. We find that specific (orderings of) strategies interact uniquely with a request's content to impact success rate, and thus the persuasiveness of a request.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T15:10:44Z)
• Investigating Deep Learning Approaches for Hate Speech Detection in Social Media [20.974715256618754]
  The misuse of freedom of expression has led to the increase of various cyber crimes and anti-social activities. Hate speech is one such issue that needs to be addressed very seriously as otherwise, this could pose threats to the integrity of the social fabrics. In this paper, we proposed deep learning approaches utilizing various embeddings for detecting various types of hate speeches in social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T17:28:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.