KG-EmpiRE: A Community-Maintainable Knowledge Graph for a Sustainable Literature Review on the State and Evolution of Empirical Research in Requirements Engineering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.08351v1
• Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 06:42:47 GMT
• Title: KG-EmpiRE: A Community-Maintainable Knowledge Graph for a Sustainable Literature Review on the State and Evolution of Empirical Research in Requirements Engineering
• Authors: Oliver Karras,
• Abstract summary: KG-EmpiRE is a Knowledge Graph (KG) of empirical research in requirements engineering (RE) based on scientific data extracted from 680 papers published in the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (1994-2022) KG-EmpiRE is maintained in the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), making all data openly and long-term available according to the FAIR data principles. Since its first release based on 199 papers (2014-2022), KG-EmpiRE and its analysis have been updated twice, currently covering over 650 papers.
• Score: 0.43512163406552
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the last two decades, several researchers provided snapshots of the "current" state and evolution of empirical research in requirements engineering (RE) through literature reviews. However, these literature reviews were not sustainable, as none built on or updated previous works due to the unavailability of the extracted and analyzed data. KG-EmpiRE is a Knowledge Graph (KG) of empirical research in RE based on scientific data extracted from currently 680 papers published in the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (1994-2022). KG-EmpiRE is maintained in the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG), making all data openly and long-term available according to the FAIR data principles. Our long-term goal is to constantly maintain KG-EmpiRE with the research community to synthesize a comprehensive, up-to-date, and long-term available overview of the state and evolution of empirical research in RE. Besides KG-EmpiRE, we provide its analysis with all supplementary materials in a repository. This repository contains all files with instructions for replicating and (re-)using the analysis locally or via executable environments and for repeating the research approach. Since its first release based on 199 papers (2014-2022), KG-EmpiRE and its analysis have been updated twice, currently covering over 650 papers. KG-EmpiRE and its analysis demonstrate how innovative infrastructures, such as the ORKG, can be leveraged to make data from literature reviews FAIR, openly available, and maintainable for the research community in the long term. In this way, we can enable replicable, (re-)usable, and thus sustainable literature reviews to ensure the quality, reliability, and timeliness of their research results.

Related papers

• DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language Models [50.36636396660163]
  We present DiscoveryBench, the first comprehensive benchmark that formalizes the multi-step process of data-driven discovery. Our benchmark contains 264 tasks collected across 6 diverse domains, such as sociology and engineering. Our benchmark, thus, illustrates the challenges in autonomous data-driven discovery and serves as a valuable resource for the community to make progress.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T18:58:22Z)
• SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [80.49349719239584]
  We present SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning), a dataset of 137K instruction-following demonstrations for 54 tasks. SciRIFF is the first dataset focused on extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across a wide range of scientific fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z)
• Towards a Quality Indicator for Research Data publications and Research Software publications -- A vision from the Helmholtz Association [0.24848203755267903]
  There is not yet an established process to assess and evaluate quality of research data and research software publications. The Task Group Quality Indicators for Data and Software Publications currently develops a quality indicator for research data and research software publications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T20:00:27Z)
• The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physics [0.0]
  We introduce the new comprehensive Open Review-Based dataset (ORB) It includes a curated list of more than 36,000 scientific papers with their more than 89,000 reviews and final decisions. This paper presents our data architecture and an overview of the collected data along with relevant statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T20:52:02Z)
• Divide and Conquer the EmpiRE: A Community-Maintainable Knowledge Graph of Empirical Research in Requirements Engineering [0.3277163122167433]
  Empirical research in requirements engineering (RE) is constantly evolving. The underlying problem is the unavailability of data from earlier works. We examine the use of the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) as such an infrastructure to build and publish an initial Knowledge Graph of Empirical research in RE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T08:55:35Z)
• A Review on Knowledge Graphs for Healthcare: Resources, Applications, and Promises [53.48844796428081]
  This work provides the first comprehensive review of healthcare knowledge graphs (HKGs) It summarizes the pipeline and key techniques for HKG construction, as well as the common utilization approaches. At the application level, we delve into the successful integration of HKGs across various health domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T21:51:56Z)
• SKG: A Versatile Information Retrieval and Analysis Framework for Academic Papers with Semantic Knowledge Graphs [9.668240269886413]
  We propose a Semantic Knowledge Graph that integrates semantic concepts from abstracts and other meta-information to represent the corpus. The SKG can support various semantic queries in academic literature thanks to the high diversity and rich information content stored within.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T20:16:08Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Relation Extraction: Recent Advances and New Frontiers [76.51245425667845]
  Relation extraction (RE) involves identifying the relations between entities from underlying content. Deep neural networks have dominated the field of RE and made noticeable progress. This survey is expected to facilitate researchers' collaborative efforts to address the challenges of real-world RE systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T08:39:25Z)
• A Decade of Knowledge Graphs in Natural Language Processing: A Survey [3.3358633215849927]
  Knowledge graphs (KGs) have attracted a surge of interest from both academia and industry. As a representation of semantic relations between entities, KGs have proven to be particularly relevant for natural language processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T21:53:57Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• Benchmarking Graph Neural Networks [75.42159546060509]
  Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become the standard toolkit for analyzing and learning from data on graphs. For any successful field to become mainstream and reliable, benchmarks must be developed to quantify progress. GitHub repository has reached 1,800 stars and 339 forks, which demonstrates the utility of the proposed open-source framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T15:58:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.