Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09602v1
• Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 15:17:52 GMT
• Title: Improving Label Error Detection and Elimination with Uncertainty Quantification
• Authors: Johannes Jakubik, Michael Vössing, Manil Maskey, Christopher Wölfle, Gerhard Satzger,
• Abstract summary: We develop novel, model-agnostic algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification-Based Label Error Detection (UQ-LED) Our UQ-LED algorithms outperform state-of-the-art confident learning in identifying label errors. We propose a novel approach to generate realistic, class-dependent label errors synthetically.
• Score: 5.184615738004059
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Identifying and handling label errors can significantly enhance the accuracy of supervised machine learning models. Recent approaches for identifying label errors demonstrate that a low self-confidence of models with respect to a certain label represents a good indicator of an erroneous label. However, latest work has built on softmax probabilities to measure self-confidence. In this paper, we argue that -- as softmax probabilities do not reflect a model's predictive uncertainty accurately -- label error detection requires more sophisticated measures of model uncertainty. Therefore, we develop a range of novel, model-agnostic algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification-Based Label Error Detection (UQ-LED), which combine the techniques of confident learning (CL), Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), model uncertainty measures (e.g., entropy), and ensemble learning to enhance label error detection. We comprehensively evaluate our algorithms on four image classification benchmark datasets in two stages. In the first stage, we demonstrate that our UQ-LED algorithms outperform state-of-the-art confident learning in identifying label errors. In the second stage, we show that removing all identified errors from the training data based on our approach results in higher accuracies than training on all available labeled data. Importantly, besides our contributions to the detection of label errors, we particularly propose a novel approach to generate realistic, class-dependent label errors synthetically. Overall, our study demonstrates that selectively cleaning datasets with UQ-LED algorithms leads to more accurate classifications than using larger, noisier datasets.

Related papers

• Binary Classification with Confidence Difference [100.08818204756093]
  This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification. We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound the optimal convergence rate. We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T11:44:50Z)
• Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by bridging high and low-confidence predictions [4.18804572788063]
  Pseudo-labeling is a crucial technique in semi-supervised learning (SSL) We propose a new method called ReFixMatch, which aims to utilize all of the unlabeled data during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T00:27:18Z)
• Alternative Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Automatic Speech Recognition [49.42732949233184]
  When labeled data is insufficient, semi-supervised learning with the pseudo-labeling technique can significantly improve the performance of automatic speech recognition. Taking noisy labels as ground-truth in the loss function results in suboptimal performance. We propose a novel framework named alternative pseudo-labeling to tackle the issue of noisy pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-12T12:13:52Z)
• Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any model [19.84626033109009]
  We study methods to score label quality, such that the images with the lowest scores are least likely to be correctly labeled. This helps prioritize what data to review in order to ensure a high-quality training/evaluation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:29:09Z)
• Improving Opinion-based Question Answering Systems Through Label Error Detection and Overwrite [4.894035903847371]
  We propose LEDO: a model-agnostic and computationally efficient framework for Label Error Detection and Overwrite. LEDO is based on Monte Carlo Dropout combined with uncertainty metrics, and can be easily generalized to multiple tasks and data sets. Applying LEDO to an industry opinion-based question answering system demonstrates it is effective at improving accuracy in all the core models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T02:20:58Z)
• Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labels [61.97359362447732]
  Learning from noisy labels is an important and long-standing problem in machine learning for real applications. In this paper, we reformulate the label-noise problem from a generative-model perspective. Our model achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on all the standard real-world benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T03:01:36Z)
• Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspection [4.442111891959355]
  We introduce a benchmark for label error detection methods on object detection datasets. We simulate four different types of randomly introduced label errors on train and test sets of well-labeled object detection datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T10:54:52Z)
• SoftMatch: Addressing the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in Semi-supervised Learning [101.86916775218403]
  This paper revisits the popular pseudo-labeling methods via a unified sample weighting formulation. We propose SoftMatch to overcome the trade-off by maintaining both high quantity and high quality of pseudo-labels during training. In experiments, SoftMatch shows substantial improvements across a wide variety of benchmarks, including image, text, and imbalanced classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T03:53:25Z)
• Exploiting Completeness and Uncertainty of Pseudo Labels for Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection [149.23913018423022]
  Weakly supervised video anomaly detection aims to identify abnormal events in videos using only video-level labels. Two-stage self-training methods have achieved significant improvements by self-generating pseudo labels. We propose an enhancement framework by exploiting completeness and uncertainty properties for effective self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T05:53:53Z)
• CTRL: Clustering Training Losses for Label Error Detection [4.49681473359251]
  In supervised machine learning, use of correct labels is extremely important to ensure high accuracy. We propose a novel framework, calledClustering TRaining Losses for label error detection. It detects label errors in two steps based on the observation that models learn clean and noisy labels in different ways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-17T18:09:19Z)
• Progressive Identification of True Labels for Partial-Label Learning [112.94467491335611]
  Partial-label learning (PLL) is a typical weakly supervised learning problem, where each training instance is equipped with a set of candidate labels among which only one is the true label. Most existing methods elaborately designed as constrained optimizations that must be solved in specific manners, making their computational complexity a bottleneck for scaling up to big data. This paper proposes a novel framework of classifier with flexibility on the model and optimization algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-19T08:35:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.