Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11146v2
• Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:54:28 GMT
• Title: Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs
• Authors: Stephen Scarano, Vijayalakshmi Vasudevan, Mattia Samory, Kai-Cheng Yang, JungHwan Yang, Przemyslaw A. Grabowicz,
• Abstract summary: This study focuses on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S. We find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after.
• Score: 5.772751069162341
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms allow users to create polls to gather public opinion on diverse topics. However, we know little about what such polls are used for and how reliable they are, especially in significant contexts like elections. Focusing on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S., this study shows that outcomes of election polls on Twitter deviate from election results despite their prevalence. Leveraging demographic inference and statistical analysis, we find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump relative to representative mainstream polls. We investigate potential sources of biased outcomes from the point of view of inauthentic, automated, and counter-normative behavior. Using social media experiments and interviews with poll authors, we identify inconsistencies between public vote counts and those privately visible to poll authors, with the gap potentially attributable to purchased votes. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after. Finally, we identify instances of polls spreading voter fraud conspiracy theories and estimate that a couple thousand of such polls were posted in 2020. The study discusses the implications of biased election polls in the context of transparency and accountability of social media platforms.

Related papers

• Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls [1.71952017922628]
  We examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. Our findings reveal that Twitter polls are biased in various ways, starting from the position of the presidential candidates. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T14:57:29Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S. Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
  We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections. Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections. 75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z)
• Predicting the 2020 US Presidential Election with Twitter [0.0]
  Electoral prediction utilizing social media data potentially would significantly affect campaign strategies. This paper explores past successful methods from research for analysis and prediction of the 2020 US Presidential Election using Twitter data. It is inconclusive whether this is an accurate method for predicting elections due to scarcity of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T14:59:25Z)
• Correcting public opinion trends through Bayesian data assimilation [8.406968279478347]
  Measuring public opinion is a key focus during democratic elections. Traditional survey polling remains the most popular estimation technique. Twitter opinion mining has attempted to combat these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T11:39:56Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• Using Online Implicit Association Tests in Opinion Polling [2.102846336724103]
  We analyse the phenomenon of socially desirable responding (shy voters) which has emerged as one of the reasons for modern day inaccurate polling. We argue for inclusion of IATs in traditional polling and point to the fact that these can be conducted accurately online.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T15:16:15Z)
• How Twitter Data Sampling Biases U.S. Voter Behavior Characterizations [6.364128212193265]
  Recent studies reveal the existence of inauthentic actors such as malicious social bots and trolls. In this paper, we aim to close this gap using Twitter data from the 2018 U.S. midterm elections. We show that hyperactive accounts are more likely to exhibit various suspicious behaviors and share low-credibility information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T08:33:30Z)
• Electoral Forecasting Using a Novel Temporal Attenuation Model: Predicting the US Presidential Elections [91.3755431537592]
  We develop a novel macro-scale temporal attenuation (TA) model, which uses pre-election poll data to improve forecasting accuracy. Our hypothesis is that the timing of publicizing opinion polls plays a significant role in how opinion oscillates, especially right before elections. We present two different implementations of the TA model, which accumulate an average forecasting error of 2.8-3.28 points over the 48-year period.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.