Predicting the 2020 US Presidential Election with Twitter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.09640v1
• Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:59:25 GMT
• Title: Predicting the 2020 US Presidential Election with Twitter
• Authors: Michael Caballero
• Abstract summary: Electoral prediction utilizing social media data potentially would significantly affect campaign strategies. This paper explores past successful methods from research for analysis and prediction of the 2020 US Presidential Election using Twitter data. It is inconclusive whether this is an accurate method for predicting elections due to scarcity of data.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: One major sub-domain in the subject of polling public opinion with social media data is electoral prediction. Electoral prediction utilizing social media data potentially would significantly affect campaign strategies, complementing traditional polling methods and providing cheaper polling in real-time. First, this paper explores past successful methods from research for analysis and prediction of the 2020 US Presidential Election using Twitter data. Then, this research proposes a new method for electoral prediction which combines sentiment, from NLP on the text of tweets, and structural data with aggregate polling, a time series analysis, and a special focus on Twitter users critical to the election. Though this method performed worse than its baseline of polling predictions, it is inconclusive whether this is an accurate method for predicting elections due to scarcity of data. More research and more data are needed to accurately measure this method's overall effectiveness.

Related papers

• ElectionSim: Massive Population Election Simulation Powered by Large Language Model Driven Agents [70.17229548653852]
  We introduce ElectionSim, an innovative election simulation framework based on large language models. We present a million-level voter pool sampled from social media platforms to support accurate individual simulation. We also introduce PPE, a poll-based presidential election benchmark to assess the performance of our framework under the U.S. presidential election scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T05:25:50Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Analyzing and Estimating Support for U.S. Presidential Candidates in Twitter Polls [1.71952017922628]
  We examine nearly two thousand Twitter polls gauging support for U.S. presidential candidates during the 2016 and 2020 election campaigns. Our findings reveal that Twitter polls are biased in various ways, starting from the position of the presidential candidates. The 2016 and 2020 polls were predominantly crafted by older males and manifested a pronounced bias favoring candidate Donald Trump.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T14:57:29Z)
• Election Polls on Social Media: Prevalence, Biases, and Voter Fraud Beliefs [5.772751069162341]
  This study focuses on the 2020 presidential elections in the U.S. We find that Twitter polls are disproportionately authored by older males and exhibit a large bias towards candidate Donald Trump. We also find that Twitter accounts participating in election polls are more likely to be bots, and election poll outcomes tend to be more biased, before the election day than after.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T02:29:35Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• Correcting public opinion trends through Bayesian data assimilation [8.406968279478347]
  Measuring public opinion is a key focus during democratic elections. Traditional survey polling remains the most popular estimation technique. Twitter opinion mining has attempted to combat these issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-29T11:39:56Z)
• Forecasting election results by studying brand importance in online news [0.0]
  This study uses the semantic brand score, a novel measure of brand importance in big textual data, to forecast elections based on online news. Forecasts made for four voting events in Italy provided consistent results across different voting systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-12T16:30:33Z)
• Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur: Visual Communication of Uncertainty in Election Polls [56.8172499765118]
  We discuss potential sources of bias in nowcasting and forecasting. Concepts are presented to attenuate the issue of falsely perceived accuracy. One key idea is the use of Probabilities of Events instead of party shares.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-28T07:02:24Z)
• Electoral Forecasting Using a Novel Temporal Attenuation Model: Predicting the US Presidential Elections [91.3755431537592]
  We develop a novel macro-scale temporal attenuation (TA) model, which uses pre-election poll data to improve forecasting accuracy. Our hypothesis is that the timing of publicizing opinion polls plays a significant role in how opinion oscillates, especially right before elections. We present two different implementations of the TA model, which accumulate an average forecasting error of 2.8-3.28 points over the 48-year period.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T09:21:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.