Designing NLP Systems That Adapt to Diverse Worldviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11197v1
• Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 06:48:09 GMT
• Title: Designing NLP Systems That Adapt to Diverse Worldviews
• Authors: Claudiu Creanga, Liviu P. Dinu,
• Abstract summary: We argue that existing NLP datasets often obscure this by aggregating labels or filtering out disagreement. We propose a perspectivist approach: building datasets that capture annotator demographics, values, and justifications for their labels.
• Score: 4.915541242112533
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Natural Language Inference (NLI) is foundational for evaluating language understanding in AI. However, progress has plateaued, with models failing on ambiguous examples and exhibiting poor generalization. We argue that this stems from disregarding the subjective nature of meaning, which is intrinsically tied to an individual's \textit{weltanschauung} (which roughly translates to worldview). Existing NLP datasets often obscure this by aggregating labels or filtering out disagreement. We propose a perspectivist approach: building datasets that capture annotator demographics, values, and justifications for their labels. Such datasets would explicitly model diverse worldviews. Our initial experiments with a subset of the SBIC dataset demonstrate that even limited annotator metadata can improve model performance.

Related papers

• Mitigating Biases to Embrace Diversity: A Comprehensive Annotation Benchmark for Toxic Language [0.0]
  This study introduces a prescriptive annotation benchmark grounded in humanities research to ensure consistent, unbiased labeling of offensive language. We contribute two newly annotated datasets that achieve higher inter-annotator agreement between human and language model (LLM) annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T08:10:24Z)
• Visualizing Linguistic Diversity of Text Datasets Synthesized by Large Language Models [9.808214545408541]
  LinguisticLens is a novel inter-active visualization tool for making sense of and analyzing syntactic diversity of datasets. It supports hierarchical visualization of a text dataset, allowing users to quickly scan for an overview and inspect individual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T00:53:45Z)
• Multi-resolution Interpretation and Diagnostics Tool for Natural Language Classifiers [0.0]
  This paper aims to create more flexible model explainability summaries by segments of observation or clusters of words that are semantically related to each other. In addition, we introduce a root cause analysis method for NLP models, by analyzing representative False Positive and False Negative examples from different segments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T22:59:02Z)
• Neural Label Search for Zero-Shot Multi-Lingual Extractive Summarization [80.94424037751243]
  In zero-shot multilingual extractive text summarization, a model is typically trained on English dataset and then applied on summarization datasets of other languages. We propose NLS (Neural Label Search for Summarization), which jointly learns hierarchical weights for different sets of labels together with our summarization model. We conduct multilingual zero-shot summarization experiments on MLSUM and WikiLingua datasets, and we achieve state-of-the-art results using both human and automatic evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T14:02:16Z)
• Automatically Identifying Semantic Bias in Crowdsourced Natural Language Inference Datasets [78.6856732729301]
  We introduce a model-driven, unsupervised technique to find "bias clusters" in a learned embedding space of hypotheses in NLI datasets. interventions and additional rounds of labeling can be performed to ameliorate the semantic bias of the hypothesis distribution of a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T22:49:01Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
• Learning to Model and Ignore Dataset Bias with Mixed Capacity Ensembles [66.15398165275926]
  We propose a method that can automatically detect and ignore dataset-specific patterns, which we call dataset biases. Our method trains a lower capacity model in an ensemble with a higher capacity model. We show improvement in all settings, including a 10 point gain on the visual question answering dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-07T22:20:03Z)
• Geometry matters: Exploring language examples at the decision boundary [2.7249290070320034]
  BERT, CNN and fasttext are susceptible to word substitutions in high difficulty examples. On YelpReviewPolarity we observe a correlation coefficient of -0.4 between resilience to perturbations and the difficulty score. Our approach is simple, architecture agnostic and can be used to study the fragilities of text classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-14T16:26:13Z)
• Towards Understanding Sample Variance in Visually Grounded Language Generation: Evaluations and Observations [67.4375210552593]
  We design experiments to understand an important but often ignored problem in visually grounded language generation. Given that humans have different utilities and visual attention, how will the sample variance in multi-reference datasets affect the models' performance? We show that it is of paramount importance to report variance in experiments; that human-generated references could vary drastically in different datasets/tasks, revealing the nature of each task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T20:45:14Z)
• Evaluating Models' Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets [119.38387782979474]
  We propose a new annotation paradigm for NLP that helps to close systematic gaps in the test data. We demonstrate the efficacy of contrast sets by creating them for 10 diverse NLP datasets. Although our contrast sets are not explicitly adversarial, model performance is significantly lower on them than on the original test sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T14:47:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.