Double Correction Framework for Denoising Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11272v3
• Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 03:54:22 GMT
• Title: Double Correction Framework for Denoising Recommendation
• Authors: Zhuangzhuang He, Yifan Wang, Yonghui Yang, Peijie Sun, Le Wu, Haoyue Bai, Jinqi Gong, Richang Hong, Min Zhang,
• Abstract summary: In implicit feedback, noisy samples can affect precise user preference learning. A popular solution is based on dropping noisy samples in the model training phase. We propose a Double Correction Framework for Denoising Recommendation.
• Score: 45.98207284259792
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As its availability and generality in online services, implicit feedback is more commonly used in recommender systems. However, implicit feedback usually presents noisy samples in real-world recommendation scenarios (such as misclicks or non-preferential behaviors), which will affect precise user preference learning. To overcome the noisy samples problem, a popular solution is based on dropping noisy samples in the model training phase, which follows the observation that noisy samples have higher training losses than clean samples. Despite the effectiveness, we argue that this solution still has limits. (1) High training losses can result from model optimization instability or hard samples, not just noisy samples. (2) Completely dropping of noisy samples will aggravate the data sparsity, which lacks full data exploitation. To tackle the above limitations, we propose a Double Correction Framework for Denoising Recommendation (DCF), which contains two correction components from views of more precise sample dropping and avoiding more sparse data. In the sample dropping correction component, we use the loss value of the samples over time to determine whether it is noise or not, increasing dropping stability. Instead of averaging directly, we use the damping function to reduce the bias effect of outliers. Furthermore, due to the higher variance exhibited by hard samples, we derive a lower bound for the loss through concentration inequality to identify and reuse hard samples. In progressive label correction, we iteratively re-label highly deterministic noisy samples and retrain them to further improve performance. Finally, extensive experimental results on three datasets and four backbones demonstrate the effectiveness and generalization of our proposed framework.

Related papers

• Large Language Model Enhanced Hard Sample Identification for Denoising Recommendation [4.297249011611168]
  Implicit feedback is often used to build recommender systems. Previous studies have attempted to alleviate this by identifying noisy samples based on their diverged patterns. We propose a Large Language Model Enhanced Hard Sample Denoising framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T14:57:09Z)
• ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models [59.10763211091664]
  We propose an iterative alignment approach that integrates noise-tolerance and filtering of noisy samples without the aid of external models. Experiments on three widely-used datasets with Mistral-7B and Llama-2-7B demonstrate that ROPO significantly outperforms existing preference alignment methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T13:58:51Z)
• Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selection [82.43311784594384]
  Real-world datasets contain not only noisy labels but also class imbalance. We propose a simple yet effective method to address noisy labels in imbalanced datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T10:34:53Z)
• Late Stopping: Avoiding Confidently Learning from Mislabeled Examples [61.00103151680946]
  We propose a new framework, Late Stopping, which leverages the intrinsic robust learning ability of DNNs through a prolonged training process. We empirically observe that mislabeled and clean examples exhibit differences in the number of epochs required for them to be consistently and correctly classified. Experimental results on benchmark-simulated and real-world noisy datasets demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T12:43:25Z)
• Denoising after Entropy-based Debiasing A Robust Training Method for Dataset Bias with Noisy Labels [12.335698325757491]
  We propose an approach called denoising after entropy-based debiasing, i.e., DENEB, which has three main stages. We find that running denoising algorithms before debiasing is ineffective because denoising algorithms reduce the impact of difficult-to-learn samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T04:34:59Z)
• Neighborhood Collective Estimation for Noisy Label Identification and Correction [92.20697827784426]
  Learning with noisy labels (LNL) aims at designing strategies to improve model performance and generalization by mitigating the effects of model overfitting to noisy labels. Recent advances employ the predicted label distributions of individual samples to perform noise verification and noisy label correction, easily giving rise to confirmation bias. We propose Neighborhood Collective Estimation, in which the predictive reliability of a candidate sample is re-estimated by contrasting it against its feature-space nearest neighbors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T14:47:22Z)
• Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labels [58.867237220886885]
  We propose a noise-robust approach named Jo-SRC (Joint Sample Selection and Model Regularization based on Consistency) Specifically, we train the network in a contrastive learning manner. Predictions from two different views of each sample are used to estimate its "likelihood" of being clean or out-of-distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-24T07:26:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.