Unveiling and Manipulating Prompt Influence in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.11891v1
• Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 09:15:36 GMT
• Title: Unveiling and Manipulating Prompt Influence in Large Language Models
• Authors: Zijian Feng, Hanzhang Zhou, Zixiao Zhu, Junlang Qian, Kezhi Mao,
• Abstract summary: Token Distribution Dynamics (TDD) is a textcolorblacksimple yet effective approach to unveil and manipulate the role of prompts in generating Large Language Models (LLMs)
• Score: 12.04811490937078
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Prompts play a crucial role in guiding the responses of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the intricate role of individual tokens in prompts, known as input saliency, in shaping the responses remains largely underexplored. Existing saliency methods either misalign with LLM generation objectives or rely heavily on linearity assumptions, leading to potential inaccuracies. To address this, we propose Token Distribution Dynamics (TDD), a \textcolor{black}{simple yet effective} approach to unveil and manipulate the role of prompts in generating LLM outputs. TDD leverages the robust interpreting capabilities of the language model head (LM head) to assess input saliency. It projects input tokens into the embedding space and then estimates their significance based on distribution dynamics over the vocabulary. We introduce three TDD variants: forward, backward, and bidirectional, each offering unique insights into token relevance. Extensive experiments reveal that the TDD surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with a big margin in elucidating the causal relationships between prompts and LLM outputs. Beyond mere interpretation, we apply TDD to two prompt manipulation tasks for controlled text generation: zero-shot toxic language suppression and sentiment steering. Empirical results underscore TDD's proficiency in identifying both toxic and sentimental cues in prompts, subsequently mitigating toxicity or modulating sentiment in the generated content.

Related papers

• Graph-DPEP: Decomposed Plug and Ensemble Play for Few-Shot Document Relation Extraction with Graph-of-Thoughts Reasoning [34.85741925091139]
  Graph-DPEP framework is grounded in the reasoning behind triplet explanation thoughts presented in natural language. We develop "ensemble-play", reapplying generation on the entire type list by leveraging the reasoning thoughts embedded in a sub-graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T07:12:36Z)
• Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users. We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• ULTRA: Unleash LLMs' Potential for Event Argument Extraction through Hierarchical Modeling and Pair-wise Refinement [6.39480325103865]
  Event argument extraction (EAE) is the task of identifying role-specific text spans (i.e., arguments) for a given event. We propose a hierarchical framework that extracts event arguments more cost-effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T04:13:28Z)
• Prompt Highlighter: Interactive Control for Multi-Modal LLMs [50.830448437285355]
  This study targets a critical aspect of multi-modal LLMs' (LLMs&VLMs) inference: explicit controllable text generation. We introduce a novel inference method, Prompt Highlighter, which enables users to highlight specific prompt spans to interactively control the focus during generation. We find that, during inference, guiding the models with highlighted tokens through the attention weights leads to more desired outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T13:53:29Z)
• BOOST: Harnessing Black-Box Control to Boost Commonsense in LMs' Generation [60.77990074569754]
  We present a computation-efficient framework that steers a frozen Pre-Trained Language Model towards more commonsensical generation. Specifically, we first construct a reference-free evaluator that assigns a sentence with a commonsensical score. We then use the scorer as the oracle for commonsense knowledge, and extend the controllable generation method called NADO to train an auxiliary head.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T23:32:12Z)
• Analyzing Chain-of-Thought Prompting in Large Language Models via Gradient-based Feature Attributions [10.621564997491808]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to empirically improve the accuracy of large language models. We investigate whether CoT prompting affects the relative importances they assign to particular input tokens. Our results indicate that while CoT prompting does not increase the magnitude of saliency scores attributed to semantically relevant tokens in the prompt, it increases the robustness of saliency scores to question perturbations and variations in model output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T08:51:30Z)
• Enhancing Large Language Models Against Inductive Instructions with Dual-critique Prompting [55.15697111170836]
  This paper reveals the behaviors of large language models (LLMs) towards textitinductive instructions and enhance their truthfulness and helpfulness accordingly. After extensive human and automatic evaluations, we uncovered a universal vulnerability among LLMs in processing inductive instructions. We identify that different inductive styles affect the models' ability to identify the same underlying errors, and the complexity of the underlying assumptions also influences the model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T06:38:20Z)
• Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting [114.84930073977672]
  We introduce Directional Stimulus Prompting, a novel framework for guiding black-box large language models (LLMs) toward specific desired outputs. Instead of directly adjusting LLMs, our method employs a small tunable policy model to generate an auxiliary directional stimulus prompt for each input instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T17:44:15Z)
• Dictionary-based Phrase-level Prompting of Large Language Models for Machine Translation [91.57514888410205]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable machine translation (MT) abilities via prompting. LLMs can struggle to translate inputs with rare words, which are common in low resource or domain transfer scenarios. We show that LLM prompting can provide an effective solution for rare words as well, by using prior knowledge from bilingual dictionaries to provide control hints in the prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T18:46:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.