GPT-4 Jailbreaks Itself with Near-Perfect Success Using Self-Explanation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13077v2
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:50:58 GMT
• Title: GPT-4 Jailbreaks Itself with Near-Perfect Success Using Self-Explanation
• Authors: Govind Ramesh, Yao Dou, Wei Xu,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Iterative Refinement Induced Self-Jailbreak (IRIS), a novel approach to jailbreaking with only black-box access. Unlike previous methods, IRIS simplifies the jailbreaking process by using a single model as both the attacker and target. We find that IRIS jailbreak success rates of 98% on GPT-4, 92% on GPT-4 Turbo, and 94% on Llama-3.1-70B in under 7 queries.
• Score: 9.377563769107843
• License:
• Abstract: Research on jailbreaking has been valuable for testing and understanding the safety and security issues of large language models (LLMs). In this paper, we introduce Iterative Refinement Induced Self-Jailbreak (IRIS), a novel approach that leverages the reflective capabilities of LLMs for jailbreaking with only black-box access. Unlike previous methods, IRIS simplifies the jailbreaking process by using a single model as both the attacker and target. This method first iteratively refines adversarial prompts through self-explanation, which is crucial for ensuring that even well-aligned LLMs obey adversarial instructions. IRIS then rates and enhances the output given the refined prompt to increase its harmfulness. We find that IRIS achieves jailbreak success rates of 98% on GPT-4, 92% on GPT-4 Turbo, and 94% on Llama-3.1-70B in under 7 queries. It significantly outperforms prior approaches in automatic, black-box, and interpretable jailbreaking, while requiring substantially fewer queries, thereby establishing a new standard for interpretable jailbreaking methods.

Related papers

• What Features in Prompts Jailbreak LLMs? Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Attacks [3.0700566896646047]
  We show that different jailbreaking methods work via different nonlinear features in prompts. These mechanistic jailbreaks are able to jailbreak Gemma-7B-IT more reliably than 34 of the 35 techniques that it was trained on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-02T17:29:47Z)
• Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation [71.92055093709924]
  We propose a novel method that "translates" garbled adversarial prompts into coherent and human-readable natural language adversarial prompts. It also offers a new approach to discovering effective designs for jailbreak prompts, advancing the understanding of jailbreak attacks. Our method achieves over 90% attack success rates against Llama-2-Chat models on AdvBench, despite their outstanding resistance to jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T06:31:04Z)
• Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs [33.87649859430635]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have excelled in various tasks but are still vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks. We introduce a novel jailbreaking attack framework that adapts the black-box fuzz testing approach with a series of customized designs. Our method achieves attack success rates of over 90%,80% and 74%, respectively, exceeding existing baselines by more than 60%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:03:09Z)
• EnJa: Ensemble Jailbreak on Large Language Models [69.13666224876408]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical applications. LLMs can still be jailbroken by carefully crafted malicious prompts, producing content that violates policy regulations. We propose a novel EnJa attack to hide harmful instructions using prompt-level jailbreak, boost the attack success rate using a gradient-based attack, and connect the two types of jailbreak attacks via a template-based connector.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T07:46:08Z)
• Can Large Language Models Automatically Jailbreak GPT-4V? [64.04997365446468]
  We introduce AutoJailbreak, an innovative automatic jailbreak technique inspired by prompt optimization. Our experiments demonstrate that AutoJailbreak significantly surpasses conventional methods, achieving an Attack Success Rate (ASR) exceeding 95.3%. This research sheds light on strengthening GPT-4V security, underscoring the potential for LLMs to be exploited in compromising GPT-4V integrity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T17:50:45Z)
• EasyJailbreak: A Unified Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Models [53.87416566981008]
  This paper introduces EasyJailbreak, a unified framework simplifying the construction and evaluation of jailbreak attacks against Large Language Models (LLMs) It builds jailbreak attacks using four components: Selector, Mutator, Constraint, and Evaluator. Our validation across 10 distinct LLMs reveals a significant vulnerability, with an average breach probability of 60% under various jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T18:39:53Z)
• Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automatically [34.36053833900958]
  We present Tree of Attacks with Pruning (TAP), an automated method for generating jailbreaks. TAP generates prompts that jailbreak state-of-the-art LLMs for more than 80% of the prompts. TAP is also capable of jailbreaking LLMs protected by state-of-the-art guardrails, e.g., LlamaGuard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T18:49:23Z)
• Jailbreaking GPT-4V via Self-Adversarial Attacks with System Prompts [64.60375604495883]
  We discover a system prompt leakage vulnerability in GPT-4V. By employing GPT-4 as a red teaming tool against itself, we aim to search for potential jailbreak prompts leveraging stolen system prompts. We also evaluate the effect of modifying system prompts to defend against jailbreaking attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T17:17:39Z)
• Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries [97.29563503097995]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial jailbreaks. We propose an algorithm that generates semantic jailbreaks with only black-box access to an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T15:38:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.