Guarding Multiple Secrets: Enhanced Summary Statistic Privacy for Data Sharing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13804v3
• Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 23:41:39 GMT
• Title: Guarding Multiple Secrets: Enhanced Summary Statistic Privacy for Data Sharing
• Authors: Shuaiqi Wang, Rongzhe Wei, Mohsen Ghassemi, Eleonora Kreacic, Vamsi K. Potluru,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework to define, analyze, and protect multi-secret summary statistics privacy in data sharing. We measure the privacy risk of any data release mechanism by the worst-case probability of an attacker successfully inferring summary statistic secrets.
• Score: 3.7274308010465775
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Data sharing enables critical advances in many research areas and business applications, but it may lead to inadvertent disclosure of sensitive summary statistics (e.g., means or quantiles). Existing literature only focuses on protecting a single confidential quantity, while in practice, data sharing involves multiple sensitive statistics. We propose a novel framework to define, analyze, and protect multi-secret summary statistics privacy in data sharing. Specifically, we measure the privacy risk of any data release mechanism by the worst-case probability of an attacker successfully inferring summary statistic secrets. Given an attacker's objective spanning from inferring a subset to the entirety of summary statistic secrets, we systematically design and analyze tailored privacy metrics. Defining the distortion as the worst-case distance between the original and released data distribution, we analyze the tradeoff between privacy and distortion. Our contribution also includes designing and analyzing data release mechanisms tailored for different data distributions and secret types. Evaluations on real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of our mechanisms in practical applications.

Related papers

• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• Tabular Data Synthesis with Differential Privacy: A Survey [24.500349285858597]
  Data sharing is a prerequisite for collaborative innovation, enabling organizations to leverage diverse datasets for deeper insights. Data synthesis tackles this by generating artificial datasets that preserve the statistical characteristics of real data. Differentially private data synthesis has emerged as a promising approach to privacy-aware data sharing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T06:32:48Z)
• A Summary of Privacy-Preserving Data Publishing in the Local Setting [0.6749750044497732]
  Statistical Disclosure Control aims to minimize the risk of exposing confidential information by de-identifying it. We outline the current privacy-preserving techniques employed in microdata de-identification, delve into privacy measures tailored for various disclosure scenarios, and assess metrics for information loss and predictive performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T04:23:23Z)
• $\alpha$-Mutual Information: A Tunable Privacy Measure for Privacy Protection in Data Sharing [4.475091558538915]
  This paper adopts Arimoto's $alpha$-Mutual Information as a tunable privacy measure. We formulate a general distortion-based mechanism that manipulates the original data to offer privacy protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T16:26:14Z)
• Summary Statistic Privacy in Data Sharing [23.50797952699759]
  We study a setting where a data holder wishes to share data with a receiver, without revealing certain summary statistics of the data distribution. We propose summary statistic privacy, a metric for quantifying the privacy risk of such a mechanism. We show that the proposed quantization mechanisms achieve better privacy-distortion tradeoffs than alternative privacy mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T15:29:19Z)
• Breaking the Communication-Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoff with $f$-Differential Privacy [51.11280118806893]
  We consider a federated data analytics problem in which a server coordinates the collaborative data analysis of multiple users with privacy concerns and limited communication capability. We study the local differential privacy guarantees of discrete-valued mechanisms with finite output space through the lens of $f$-differential privacy (DP) More specifically, we advance the existing literature by deriving tight $f$-DP guarantees for a variety of discrete-valued mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T16:58:53Z)
• Private Set Generation with Discriminative Information [63.851085173614]
  Differentially private data generation is a promising solution to the data privacy challenge. Existing private generative models are struggling with the utility of synthetic samples. We introduce a simple yet effective method that greatly improves the sample utility of state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T10:02:55Z)
• DP2-Pub: Differentially Private High-Dimensional Data Publication with Invariant Post Randomization [58.155151571362914]
  We propose a differentially private high-dimensional data publication mechanism (DP2-Pub) that runs in two phases. splitting attributes into several low-dimensional clusters with high intra-cluster cohesion and low inter-cluster coupling helps obtain a reasonable privacy budget. We also extend our DP2-Pub mechanism to the scenario with a semi-honest server which satisfies local differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T17:52:43Z)
• Protecting Global Properties of Datasets with Distribution Privacy Mechanisms [8.19841678851784]
  We show how a distribution privacy framework can be applied to formalize such data confidentiality. We then empirically evaluate the privacy-utility tradeoffs of these mechanisms and apply them against a practical property inference attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T03:54:38Z)
• Post-processing of Differentially Private Data: A Fairness Perspective [53.29035917495491]
  This paper shows that post-processing causes disparate impacts on individuals or groups. It analyzes two critical settings: the release of differentially private datasets and the use of such private datasets for downstream decisions. It proposes a novel post-processing mechanism that is (approximately) optimal under different fairness metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-24T02:45:03Z)
• Decision Making with Differential Privacy under a Fairness Lens [65.16089054531395]
  The U.S. Census Bureau releases data sets and statistics about groups of individuals that are used as input to a number of critical decision processes. To conform to privacy and confidentiality requirements, these agencies are often required to release privacy-preserving versions of the data. This paper studies the release of differentially private data sets and analyzes their impact on some critical resource allocation tasks under a fairness perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T21:04:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.