Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14388v1
• Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 10:04:36 GMT
• Title: Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models
• Authors: Luc Bryan Heitz, Joun Chamas, Christopher Scherb,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLM) have revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions.
• Score: 0.16385815610837165
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The advent of Large Language Models (LLM) has revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed, marking a significant leap in productivity through technological innovation. As these chatbots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the challenge of assessing the quality of their outputs has become paramount. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions. Through the lens of a real-world example coupled with a systematic dataset, we investigate the code quality produced by these LLMs. Given their notable proficiency in code generation, this aspect of chatbot capability presents a particularly compelling area for analysis. Furthermore, the complexity of programming code often escalates to levels where its verification becomes a formidable task, underscoring the importance of our study. This research aims to shed light on the efficacy and reliability of LLMs in generating high-quality programming code, an endeavor that has significant implications for the field of software development and beyond.

Related papers

• Exploring Code Language Models for Automated HLS-based Hardware Generation: Benchmark, Infrastructure and Analysis [49.998130983414924]
  Large language models (LLMs) can be employed for programming languages such as Python and C++. This paper explores leveraging LLMs to generate High-Level Synthesis (HLS)-based hardware design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T17:53:59Z)
• Resource-Efficient & Effective Code Summarization [3.512140256677132]
  GreenAI techniques, such as QLoRA, offer a promising path for dealing with large models' sustainability. Our study evaluates two state-of-the-art CLMs across two programming languages: Python and Java. Results show that QLoRA enables efficient fine-tuning of CLMs for code summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T21:06:30Z)
• Analysis of Student-LLM Interaction in a Software Engineering Project [1.2233362977312945]
  We analyze 126 undergraduate students' interaction with an AI assistant during a 13-week semester to understand the benefits of AI for software engineering learning. Our findings suggest that students prefer ChatGPT over CoPilot. conversational-based interaction helps improve the quality of the code generated compared to auto-generated code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T11:44:00Z)
• Case2Code: Scalable Synthetic Data for Code Generation [105.89741089673575]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown outstanding breakthroughs in code generation. Recent work improves code LLMs by training on synthetic data generated by some powerful LLMs. We propose a textbfCase2Code task by exploiting the expressiveness and correctness of programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T11:35:00Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• Agent-Driven Automatic Software Improvement [55.2480439325792]
  This research proposal aims to explore innovative solutions by focusing on the deployment of agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) The iterative nature of agents, which allows for continuous learning and adaptation, can help surpass common challenges in code generation. We aim to use the iterative feedback in these systems to further fine-tune the LLMs underlying the agents, becoming better aligned to the task of automated software improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T15:45:22Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study [72.24266814625685]
  We explore the performance of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software development lifecycle with DevEval. DevEval features four programming languages, multiple domains, high-quality data collection, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task. Empirical studies show that current LLMs, including GPT-4, fail to solve the challenges presented within DevEval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T15:13:44Z)
• Testing LLMs on Code Generation with Varying Levels of Prompt Specificity [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated unparalleled prowess in mimicking human-like text generation and processing. The potential to transform natural language prompts into executable code promises a major shift in software development practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T23:41:41Z)
• No Need to Lift a Finger Anymore? Assessing the Quality of Code Generation by ChatGPT [28.68768157452352]
  This study examines the quality of code generation using ChatGPT. We leverage 728 algorithm problems in five languages (i.e., C, C++, Java, Python, and JavaScript) and 18 CWEs with 54 code scenarios for the code generation task. Our findings uncover potential issues and limitations that arise in the ChatGPT-based code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T10:01:09Z)
• An Empirical Study of AI-based Smart Contract Creation [4.801455786801489]
  Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and Google Palm2 for smart contract generation seem to be the first well-established instance of an AI pair programmer. The main objective of this study is to assess the quality of generated code provided by LLMs for smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-05T21:38:57Z)
• Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCode [74.87216298566942]
  We introduce AlphaCode, a system for code generation that can create novel solutions to problems that require deeper reasoning. In simulated evaluations on recent programming competitions on the Codeforces platform, AlphaCode achieved on average a ranking of top 54.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T23:16:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.