Related papers: Creativity and Markov Decision Processes

Creativity and Markov Decision Processes

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14966v1
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 18:16:42 GMT
Title: Creativity and Markov Decision Processes
Authors: Joonas Lahikainen, Nadia M. Ady, Christian Guckelsberger,
Abstract summary: We identify formal mappings between Boden's process theory of creativity and Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) We study three out of eleven mappings in detail to understand which types of creative processes, opportunities foraberrations, and threats to creativity (uninspiration) could be observed in an MDP. We conclude by discussing quality criteria for the selection of such mappings for future work and applications.
Score: 0.20482269513546453
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: Creativity is already regularly attributed to AI systems outside specialised computational creativity (CC) communities. However, the evaluation of creativity in AI at large typically lacks grounding in creativity theory, which can promote inappropriate attributions and limit the analysis of creative behaviour. While CC researchers have translated psychological theory into formal models, the value of these models is limited by a gap to common AI frameworks. To mitigate this limitation, we identify formal mappings between Boden's process theory of creativity and Markov Decision Processes (MDPs), using the Creative Systems Framework as a stepping stone. We study three out of eleven mappings in detail to understand which types of creative processes, opportunities for (aberrations), and threats to creativity (uninspiration) could be observed in an MDP. We conclude by discussing quality criteria for the selection of such mappings for future work and applications.

Related papers

Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
Creativity Has Left the Chat: The Price of Debiasing Language Models [1.223779595809275]
We investigate the unintended consequences of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback on the creativity of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our findings have significant implications for marketers who rely on LLMs for creative tasks such as copywriting, ad creation, and customer persona generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-08T22:14:51Z)
Can AI Be as Creative as Humans? [84.43873277557852]
We prove in theory that AI can be as creative as humans under the condition that it can properly fit the data generated by human creators. The debate on AI's creativity is reduced into the question of its ability to fit a sufficient amount of data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-03T08:49:12Z)
A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images. We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z)
The Creative Frontier of Generative AI: Managing the Novelty-Usefulness Tradeoff [0.4873362301533825]
We explore the optimal balance between novelty and usefulness in generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. Overemphasizing either aspect can lead to limitations such as hallucinations and memorization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T11:44:57Z)
Challenges in creative generative models for music: a divergence maximization perspective [3.655021726150369]
Development of generative Machine Learning models in creative practices is raising more interest among artists, practitioners and performers. Most models are still unable to generate content that lay outside of the domain defined by the training dataset. We propose an alternative prospective framework, starting from a new general formulation of ML objectives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T12:02:43Z)
Towards Creativity Characterization of Generative Models via Group-based Subset Scanning [64.6217849133164]
We propose group-based subset scanning to identify, quantify, and characterize creative processes. We find that creative samples generate larger subsets of anomalies than normal or non-creative samples across datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-01T15:07:14Z)
Towards creativity characterization of generative models via group-based subset scanning [51.84144826134919]
We propose group-based subset scanning to quantify, detect, and characterize creative processes. Creative samples generate larger subsets of anomalies than normal or non-creative samples across datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-01T14:07:49Z)
Creativity of Deep Learning: Conceptualization and Assessment [1.5738019181349994]
We use insights from computational creativity to conceptualize and assess current applications of generative deep learning in creative domains. We highlight parallels between current systems and different models of human creativity as well as their shortcomings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-03T21:44:07Z)
Explaining Creative Artifacts [69.86890599471202]
We develop an inverse problem formulation to deconstruct the products of and compositional creativity into associative chains. In particular, our formulation is structured as solving a traveling salesman problem through a knowledge graph of associative elements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-14T14:32:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.