OptLLM: Optimal Assignment of Queries to Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15130v1
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 01:05:37 GMT
- Title: OptLLM: Optimal Assignment of Queries to Large Language Models
- Authors: Yueyue Liu, Hongyu Zhang, Yuantian Miao, Van-Hoang Le, Zhiqiang Li,
- Abstract summary: We propose a framework for addressing the cost-effective query allocation problem for large language models (LLMs)
Our framework, named OptLLM, provides users with a range of optimal solutions to choose from, aligning with their budget constraints and performance preferences.
To evaluate the effectiveness of OptLLM, we conduct extensive experiments on various types of tasks, including text classification, question answering, sentiment analysis, reasoning, and log parsing.
- Score: 12.07164196530872
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have garnered considerable attention owing to their remarkable capabilities, leading to an increasing number of companies offering LLMs as services. Different LLMs achieve different performance at different costs. A challenge for users lies in choosing the LLMs that best fit their needs, balancing cost and performance. In this paper, we propose a framework for addressing the cost-effective query allocation problem for LLMs. Given a set of input queries and candidate LLMs, our framework, named OptLLM, provides users with a range of optimal solutions to choose from, aligning with their budget constraints and performance preferences, including options for maximizing accuracy and minimizing cost. OptLLM predicts the performance of candidate LLMs on each query using a multi-label classification model with uncertainty estimation and then iteratively generates a set of non-dominated solutions by destructing and reconstructing the current solution. To evaluate the effectiveness of OptLLM, we conduct extensive experiments on various types of tasks, including text classification, question answering, sentiment analysis, reasoning, and log parsing. Our experimental results demonstrate that OptLLM substantially reduces costs by 2.40% to 49.18% while achieving the same accuracy as the best LLM. Compared to other multi-objective optimization algorithms, OptLLM improves accuracy by 2.94% to 69.05% at the same cost or saves costs by 8.79% and 95.87% while maintaining the highest attainable accuracy.
Related papers
- Optima: Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [75.25394449773052]
Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show remarkable potential in collaborative problem-solving.
Yet they still face critical challenges: low communication efficiency, poor scalability, and a lack of effective parameter-updating optimization methods.
We present Optima, a novel framework that addresses these issues by significantly enhancing both communication efficiency and task effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:00:06Z) - Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making.
Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate.
We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z) - LLM Self-Correction with DeCRIM: Decompose, Critique, and Refine for Enhanced Following of Instructions with Multiple Constraints [86.59857711385833]
We introduce RealInstruct, the first benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to follow real-world multi-constrained instructions.
To address the performance gap between open-source and proprietary models, we propose the Decompose, Critique and Refine (DeCRIM) self-correction pipeline.
Our results show that DeCRIM improves Mistral's performance by 7.3% on RealInstruct and 8.0% on IFEval even with weak feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T01:25:10Z) - EVOLvE: Evaluating and Optimizing LLMs For Exploration [76.66831821738927]
Large language models (LLMs) remain under-studied in scenarios requiring optimal decision-making under uncertainty.
We measure LLMs' (in)ability to make optimal decisions in bandits, a state-less reinforcement learning setting relevant to many applications.
Motivated by the existence of optimal exploration algorithms, we propose efficient ways to integrate this algorithmic knowledge into LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T17:54:03Z) - SelectLLM: Query-Aware Efficient Selection Algorithm for Large Language Models [8.558834738072363]
Large language models (LLMs) have gained increased popularity due to their remarkable success across various tasks.
However, individual LLMs have limitations when applied to complex tasks because of such factors as training biases, model sizes, and the datasets used.
We introduce SelectLLM, a novel algorithm that directs input queries to the most suitable subset of LLMs from a large pool.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T06:11:21Z) - MetaLLM: A High-performant and Cost-efficient Dynamic Framework for Wrapping LLMs [21.689490112983677]
We introduce MetaLLM, a framework that dynamically routes each query to the optimal large language models (LLMs) for classification tasks.
By framing the selection problem as a multi-armed bandit, MetaLLM balances prediction accuracy and cost efficiency under uncertainty.
Our experiments, conducted on popular LLM platforms, showcase MetaLLM's efficacy in real-world scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-15T15:45:07Z) - Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks.
LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning.
We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z) - SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees [21.801053526411415]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
The deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance.
We introduce SMART, a novel framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T17:45:47Z) - Towards Optimizing the Costs of LLM Usage [4.032848774697859]
We study optimization problems trading off the quality and costs, both theoretically and empirically.
We propose several deterministics for reducing tokens in a quality aware manner.
Our methods reduce costs by 40%- 90% while improving quality by 4%-7%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-29T16:36:31Z) - On Leveraging Large Language Models for Enhancing Entity Resolution: A Cost-efficient Approach [7.996010840316654]
We propose an uncertainty reduction framework using Large Language Models (LLMs) to improve entity resolution results.
LLMs capitalize on their advanced linguistic capabilities and a pay-as-you-go'' model that provides significant advantages to those without extensive data science expertise.
We show that our method is efficient and effective, offering promising applications in real-world tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-07T09:06:58Z) - FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large
Language Models in Federated Learning [70.38817963253034]
This paper first discusses these challenges of federated fine-tuning LLMs, and introduces our package FS-LLM as a main contribution.
We provide comprehensive federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithm implementations and versatile programming interfaces for future extension in FL scenarios.
We conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of FS-LLM and benchmark advanced LLMs with state-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithms in FL settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T09:40:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.