SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13835v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 17:45:47 GMT
• Title: SMART: Automatically Scaling Down Language Models with Accuracy Guarantees for Reduced Processing Fees
• Authors: Saehan Jo, Immanuel Trummer,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. The deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance. We introduce SMART, a novel framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality.
• Score: 21.801053526411415
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly boosted performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, the deployment of high-performance LLMs incurs substantial costs, primarily due to the increased number of parameters aimed at enhancing model performance. This has made the use of state-of-the-art LLMs more expensive for end-users. AI service providers, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, often offer multiple versions of LLMs with varying prices and performance. However, end-users still face challenges in choosing the appropriate LLM for their tasks that balance result quality with cost. We introduce SMART, Scaling Models Adaptively for Reduced Token Fees, a novel LLM framework designed to minimize the inference costs of NLP tasks while ensuring sufficient result quality. It enables users to specify an accuracy constraint in terms of the equivalence of outputs to those of the most powerful LLM. SMART then generates results that deviate from the outputs of this LLM only with a probability below a user-defined threshold. SMART employs a profiling phase that evaluates the performance of multiple LLMs to identify those that meet the user-defined accuracy level. SMART optimizes the tradeoff between profiling overheads and the anticipated cost savings resulting from profiling. Moreover, our approach significantly reduces inference costs by strategically leveraging a mix of LLMs. Our experiments on three real-world datasets show that, based on OpenAI models, SMART achieves significant cost savings, up to 25.6x in comparison to GPT-4.

Related papers

• A Little Help Goes a Long Way: Efficient LLM Training by Leveraging Small LMs [74.35290684163718]
  A primary challenge in large language model (LLM) development is their onerous pre-training cost. This paper explores a promising paradigm to improve LLM pre-training efficiency and quality by leveraging a small language model (SLM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T14:31:52Z)
• Efficient Hybrid Inference for LLMs: Reward-Based Token Modelling with Selective Cloud Assistance [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known for their exceptional performance across a range of natural language processing tasks. Smaller language models (SLMs), which can be deployed on lower-cost edge devices, struggle to match the performance of their larger counterparts. This paper presents a novel hybrid inference approach that leverages the strengths of both model types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T15:12:45Z)
• Understanding the Performance and Estimating the Cost of LLM Fine-Tuning [9.751868268608675]
  Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) for specific tasks in a cost-effective manner. In this paper, we characterize sparse Mixture of Experts (MoE) based LLM fine-tuning to understand their accuracy and runtime performance. We also develop and validate an analytical model to estimate the cost of LLM fine-tuning on the cloud.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T16:26:07Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• MetaLLM: A High-performant and Cost-efficient Dynamic Framework for Wrapping LLMs [21.689490112983677]
  We introduce MetaLLM, a framework that dynamically routes each query to the optimal large language models (LLMs) for classification tasks. By framing the selection problem as a multi-armed bandit, MetaLLM balances prediction accuracy and cost efficiency under uncertainty. Our experiments, conducted on popular LLM platforms, showcase MetaLLM's efficacy in real-world scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T15:45:07Z)
• Q*: Improving Multi-step Reasoning for LLMs with Deliberative Planning [53.6472920229013]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in many natural language tasks. LLMs are prone to produce errors, hallucinations and inconsistent statements when performing multi-step reasoning. We introduce Q*, a framework for guiding LLMs decoding process with deliberative planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:08:09Z)
• OptLLM: Optimal Assignment of Queries to Large Language Models [12.07164196530872]
  We propose a framework for addressing the cost-effective query allocation problem for large language models (LLMs) Our framework, named OptLLM, provides users with a range of optimal solutions to choose from, aligning with their budget constraints and performance preferences. To evaluate the effectiveness of OptLLM, we conduct extensive experiments on various types of tasks, including text classification, question answering, sentiment analysis, reasoning, and log parsing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T01:05:37Z)
• Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration [70.09561665520043]
  We propose a novel framework for multi-agent collaboration that introduces Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) for efficient self-refinement of plans. We provide theoretical analysis by extending advantage-weighted regression in reinforcement learning to multi-agent systems. Experiments on Over-AI and a difficult variant of RoCoBench show that ReAd surpasses baselines in success rate, and also significantly decreases the interaction steps of agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:33:19Z)
• Towards Optimizing the Costs of LLM Usage [4.032848774697859]
  We study optimization problems trading off the quality and costs, both theoretically and empirically. We propose several deterministics for reducing tokens in a quality aware manner. Our methods reduce costs by 40%- 90% while improving quality by 4%-7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T16:36:31Z)
• FederatedScope-LLM: A Comprehensive Package for Fine-tuning Large Language Models in Federated Learning [70.38817963253034]
  This paper first discusses these challenges of federated fine-tuning LLMs, and introduces our package FS-LLM as a main contribution. We provide comprehensive federated parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithm implementations and versatile programming interfaces for future extension in FL scenarios. We conduct extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of FS-LLM and benchmark advanced LLMs with state-of-the-art parameter-efficient fine-tuning algorithms in FL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T09:40:36Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.