Large Language Models can Deliver Accurate and Interpretable Time Series Anomaly Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15370v1
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 09:07:02 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models can Deliver Accurate and Interpretable Time Series Anomaly Detection
- Authors: Jun Liu, Chaoyun Zhang, Jiaxu Qian, Minghua Ma, Si Qin, Chetan Bansal, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays a crucial role in various industries by identifying atypical patterns that deviate from standard trends.
Traditional TSAD models, which often rely on deep learning, require extensive training data and operate as black boxes.
We propose LLMAD, a novel TSAD method that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver accurate and interpretable TSAD results.
- Score: 34.40206965758026
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) plays a crucial role in various industries by identifying atypical patterns that deviate from standard trends, thereby maintaining system integrity and enabling prompt response measures. Traditional TSAD models, which often rely on deep learning, require extensive training data and operate as black boxes, lacking interpretability for detected anomalies. To address these challenges, we propose LLMAD, a novel TSAD method that employs Large Language Models (LLMs) to deliver accurate and interpretable TSAD results. LLMAD innovatively applies LLMs for in-context anomaly detection by retrieving both positive and negative similar time series segments, significantly enhancing LLMs' effectiveness. Furthermore, LLMAD employs the Anomaly Detection Chain-of-Thought (AnoCoT) approach to mimic expert logic for its decision-making process. This method further enhances its performance and enables LLMAD to provide explanations for their detections through versatile perspectives, which are particularly important for user decision-making. Experiments on three datasets indicate that our LLMAD achieves detection performance comparable to state-of-the-art deep learning methods while offering remarkable interpretability for detections. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that directly employs LLMs for TSAD.
Related papers
- Large Language Models for Anomaly Detection in Computational Workflows: from Supervised Fine-Tuning to In-Context Learning [9.601067780210006]
This paper leverages large language models (LLMs) for workflow anomaly detection by exploiting their ability to learn complex data patterns.
Two approaches are investigated: 1) supervised fine-tuning (SFT), where pre-trained LLMs are fine-tuned on labeled data for sentence classification to identify anomalies, and 2) in-context learning (ICL) where prompts containing task descriptions and examples guide LLMs in few-shot anomaly detection without fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-24T16:33:04Z) - Anomaly Detection of Tabular Data Using LLMs [54.470648484612866]
We show that pre-trained large language models (LLMs) are zero-shot batch-level anomaly detectors.
We propose an end-to-end fine-tuning strategy to bring out the potential of LLMs in detecting real anomalies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T04:17:03Z) - RUPBench: Benchmarking Reasoning Under Perturbations for Robustness Evaluation in Large Language Models [12.112914393948415]
We present RUPBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) across diverse reasoning tasks.
Our benchmark incorporates 15 reasoning datasets, categorized into commonsense, arithmetic, logical, and knowledge-intensive reasoning.
By examining the performance of state-of-the-art LLMs such as GPT-4o, Llama3, Phi-3, and Gemma on both original and perturbed datasets, we provide a detailed analysis of their robustness and error patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T17:26:44Z) - Improving Logits-based Detector without Logits from Black-box LLMs [56.234109491884126]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized text generation, producing outputs that closely mimic human writing.
We present Distribution-Aligned LLMs Detection (DALD), an innovative framework that redefines the state-of-the-art performance in black-box text detection.
DALD is designed to align the surrogate model's distribution with that of unknown target LLMs, ensuring enhanced detection capability and resilience against rapid model iterations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T19:38:05Z) - Detecting Hallucinations in Large Language Model Generation: A Token Probability Approach [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) produce inaccurate outputs, also known as hallucinations.
This paper introduces a supervised learning approach employing only four numerical features derived from tokens and vocabulary probabilities obtained from other evaluators.
The method yields promising results, surpassing state-of-the-art outcomes in multiple tasks across three different benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T03:00:47Z) - The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM)
We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions.
Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z) - Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models [61.6896704217147]
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have become indispensable tools in computer vision and natural language processing.
Our investigation reveals a noteworthy bias in the generated content, where the output is primarily influenced by the underlying Large Language Models (LLMs) prior to the input image.
To rectify these biases and redirect the model's focus toward vision information, we introduce two simple, training-free strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T12:35:07Z) - Towards Modeling Learner Performance with Large Language Models [7.002923425715133]
This paper investigates whether the pattern recognition and sequence modeling capabilities of LLMs can be extended to the domain of knowledge tracing.
We compare two approaches to using LLMs for this task, zero-shot prompting and model fine-tuning, with existing, non-LLM approaches to knowledge tracing.
While LLM-based approaches do not achieve state-of-the-art performance, fine-tuned LLMs surpass the performance of naive baseline models and perform on par with standard Bayesian Knowledge Tracing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-29T14:06:34Z) - Beyond the Known: Investigating LLMs Performance on Out-of-Domain Intent
Detection [34.135738700682055]
This paper conducts a comprehensive evaluation of large language models (LLMs) represented by ChatGPT.
We find that LLMs exhibit strong zero-shot and few-shot capabilities, but is still at a disadvantage compared to models fine-tuned with full resource.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T07:02:10Z) - Are Large Language Models Really Robust to Word-Level Perturbations? [68.60618778027694]
We propose a novel rational evaluation approach that leverages pre-trained reward models as diagnostic tools.
Longer conversations manifest the comprehensive grasp of language models in terms of their proficiency in understanding questions.
Our results demonstrate that LLMs frequently exhibit vulnerability to word-level perturbations that are commonplace in daily language usage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T09:23:46Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.