Understanding the differences in Foundation Models: Attention, State Space Models, and Recurrent Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15731v2
• Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:18:33 GMT
• Title: Understanding the differences in Foundation Models: Attention, State Space Models, and Recurrent Neural Networks
• Authors: Jerome Sieber, Carmen Amo Alonso, Alexandre Didier, Melanie N. Zeilinger, Antonio Orvieto,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Dynamical Systems Framework (DSF), which allows a principled investigation of all these architectures in a common representation. We provide principled comparisons between softmax attention and other model classes, discussing the theoretical conditions under which softmax attention can be approximated. This shows the DSF's potential to guide the systematic development of future more efficient and scalable foundation models.
• Score: 50.29356570858905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Softmax attention is the principle backbone of foundation models for various artificial intelligence applications, yet its quadratic complexity in sequence length can limit its inference throughput in long-context settings. To address this challenge, alternative architectures such as linear attention, State Space Models (SSMs), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have been considered as more efficient alternatives. While connections between these approaches exist, such models are commonly developed in isolation and there is a lack of theoretical understanding of the shared principles underpinning these architectures and their subtle differences, greatly influencing performance and scalability. In this paper, we introduce the Dynamical Systems Framework (DSF), which allows a principled investigation of all these architectures in a common representation. Our framework facilitates rigorous comparisons, providing new insights on the distinctive characteristics of each model class. For instance, we compare linear attention and selective SSMs, detailing their differences and conditions under which both are equivalent. We also provide principled comparisons between softmax attention and other model classes, discussing the theoretical conditions under which softmax attention can be approximated. Additionally, we substantiate these new insights with empirical validations and mathematical arguments. This shows the DSF's potential to guide the systematic development of future more efficient and scalable foundation models.

Related papers

• Learnable & Interpretable Model Combination in Dynamic Systems Modeling [0.0]
  We discuss which types of models are usually combined and propose a model interface that is capable of expressing a variety of mixed equation based models. We propose a new wildcard topology, that is capable of describing the generic connection between two combined models in an easy to interpret fashion. The contributions of this paper are highlighted at a proof of concept: Different connection topologies between two models are learned, interpreted and compared.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T11:17:11Z)
• Explaining Modern Gated-Linear RNNs via a Unified Implicit Attention Formulation [54.50526986788175]
  Recent advances in efficient sequence modeling have led to attention-free layers, such as Mamba, RWKV, and various gated RNNs. We present a unified view of these models, formulating such layers as implicit causal self-attention layers. Our framework compares the underlying mechanisms on similar grounds for different layers and provides a direct means for applying explainability methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T09:57:45Z)
• Graph Neural PDE Solvers with Conservation and Similarity-Equivariance [6.077284832583712]
  This study introduces a novel machine-learning architecture that is highly generalizable and adheres to conservation laws and physical symmetries. The foundation of this architecture is graph neural networks (GNNs), which are adept at accommodating a variety of shapes and forms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T11:18:27Z)
• State Space Models as Foundation Models: A Control Theoretic Overview [3.3222241150972356]
  In recent years, there has been a growing interest in integrating linear state-space models (SSM) in deep neural network architectures. This paper is intended as a gentle introduction to SSM-based architectures for control theorists. It provides a systematic review of the most successful SSM proposals and highlights their main features from a control theoretic perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T16:10:47Z)
• Deep Equilibrium Models Meet Federated Learning [71.57324258813675]
  This study explores the problem of Federated Learning (FL) by utilizing the Deep Equilibrium (DEQ) models instead of conventional deep learning networks. We claim that incorporating DEQ models into the federated learning framework naturally addresses several open problems in FL. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to establish a connection between DEQ models and federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T22:51:40Z)
• Learning Neural Constitutive Laws From Motion Observations for Generalizable PDE Dynamics [97.38308257547186]
  Many NN approaches learn an end-to-end model that implicitly models both the governing PDE and material models. We argue that the governing PDEs are often well-known and should be explicitly enforced rather than learned. We introduce a new framework termed "Neural Constitutive Laws" (NCLaw) which utilizes a network architecture that strictly guarantees standard priors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T17:42:24Z)
• Universal approximation property of invertible neural networks [76.95927093274392]
  Invertible neural networks (INNs) are neural network architectures with invertibility by design. Thanks to their invertibility and the tractability of Jacobian, INNs have various machine learning applications such as probabilistic modeling, generative modeling, and representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T10:45:26Z)
• Sparse Flows: Pruning Continuous-depth Models [107.98191032466544]
  We show that pruning improves generalization for neural ODEs in generative modeling. We also show that pruning finds minimal and efficient neural ODE representations with up to 98% less parameters compared to the original network, without loss of accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T01:40:17Z)
• Disentangling Identifiable Features from Noisy Data with Structured Nonlinear ICA [4.340954888479091]
  We introduce a new general identifiable framework for principled disentanglement referred to as Structured Independent Component Analysis (SNICA) Our contribution is to extend the identifiability theory of deep generative models for a very broad class of structured models. We establish the major result that identifiability for this framework holds even in the presence of noise of unknown distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T15:56:57Z)
• Deep Learning modeling of Limit Order Book: a comparative perspective [0.0]
  The present work addresses theoretical and practical questions in the domain of Deep Learning for High Frequency Trading. State-of-the-art models such as Random models, Logistic Regressions, LSTMs, LSTMs equipped with an Attention mask, CNN-LSTM and Attentions are reviewed and compared on the same tasks. The underlying dimensions of the modeling techniques are investigated to understand whether these are intrinsic to the Limit Order Book's dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-12T17:06:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.