M$^3$CoT: A Novel Benchmark for Multi-Domain Multi-step Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.16473v1
• Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 07:56:30 GMT
• Title: M$^3$CoT: A Novel Benchmark for Multi-Domain Multi-step Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought
• Authors: Qiguang Chen, Libo Qin, Jin Zhang, Zhi Chen, Xiao Xu, Wanxiang Che,
• Abstract summary: Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) requires models to leverage knowledge from both textual and visual modalities for step-by-step reasoning. The current MCoT benchmark still faces some challenges: (1) absence of visual modal reasoning, (2) single-step visual modal reasoning, and (3) Domain missing. We introduce a novel benchmark (M$3$CoT) to address the above challenges, advancing the multi-domain, multi-step, and multi-modal CoT.
• Score: 50.576016777061724
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) requires models to leverage knowledge from both textual and visual modalities for step-by-step reasoning, which gains increasing attention. Nevertheless, the current MCoT benchmark still faces some challenges: (1) absence of visual modal reasoning, (2) single-step visual modal reasoning, and (3) Domain missing, thereby hindering the development of MCoT. Motivated by this, we introduce a novel benchmark (M$^3$CoT) to address the above challenges, advancing the multi-domain, multi-step, and multi-modal CoT. Additionally, we conduct a thorough evaluation involving abundant MCoT approaches on Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs). In addition, we highlight that the current VLLMs still struggle to correctly reason in M$^3$CoT and there remains a large gap between existing VLLMs and human performance in M$^3$CoT, despite their superior results on previous MCoT benchmarks. To our knowledge, we take the first meaningful step toward the multi-domain, multi-step, and multi-modal scenario in MCoT. We hope that M$^3$CoT can serve as a valuable resource, providing a pioneering foundation in multi-domain, multi-step, multi-modal chain-of-thought research.

Related papers

• CoMT: A Novel Benchmark for Chain of Multi-modal Thought on Large Vision-Language Models [60.08485416687596]
  Chain of Multi-modal Thought (CoMT) benchmark aims to mimic human-like reasoning that inherently integrates visual operation. We evaluate various LVLMs and strategies on CoMT, revealing some key insights into the capabilities and limitations of the current approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T14:10:16Z)
• FCMR: Robust Evaluation of Financial Cross-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning [5.65203350495478]
  We present Financial Cross-Modal Multi-Hop Reasoning (FCMR), a benchmark to analyze the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs. FCMR is categorized into three difficulty levels-Easy, Medium, and Hard-facilitating a step-by-step evaluation. Experiments on this new benchmark reveal that even state-of-the-art MLLMs struggle, with the best-performing model achieving only 30.4% accuracy on the most challenging tier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T05:50:55Z)
• Needle In A Multimodal Haystack [79.81804334634408]
  We present the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents. Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning. We observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:09:16Z)
• MMT-Bench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models Towards Multitask AGI [71.53579367538725]
  MMT-Bench is a benchmark designed to assess Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) across massive multimodal tasks. MMT-Bench comprises $31,325$ meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:37:05Z)
• What Makes Multimodal In-Context Learning Work? [58.48612721156335]
  We present a framework for investigating Multimodal ICL (M-ICL) in the context of Large Multimodal Models. M-ICL primarily relies on text-driven mechanisms, showing little to no influence from the image modality. We identify several biases and limitations of M-ICL that warrant consideration prior to deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T08:50:45Z)
• Toward Robust Multimodal Learning using Multimodal Foundational Models [30.755818450393637]
  We propose TRML, Toward Robust Multimodal Learning using Multimodal Foundational Models. TRML employs generated virtual modalities to replace missing modalities. We also design a semantic matching learning module to align semantic spaces generated and missing modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T04:46:43Z)
• Missing Modality Robustness in Semi-Supervised Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation [27.23513712371972]
  We propose a simple yet efficient multi-modal fusion mechanism Linear Fusion. We also propose M3L: Multi-modal Teacher for Masked Modality Learning. Our proposal shows an absolute improvement of up to 10% on robust mIoU above the most competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T05:52:50Z)
• Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models [94.70184390935661]
  We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T07:51:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.