A Human-Like Reasoning Framework for Multi-Phases Planning Task with Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.18208v1
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:13:32 GMT
- Title: A Human-Like Reasoning Framework for Multi-Phases Planning Task with Large Language Models
- Authors: Chengxing Xie, Difan Zou,
- Abstract summary: Multi-Phases planning problem involves multiple interconnected stages, such as outlining, information gathering, and planning.
Existing reasoning approaches have struggled to effectively address this complex task.
Our research aims to address this challenge by developing a human-like planning framework for LLM agents.
- Score: 15.874604623294427
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent studies have highlighted their proficiency in some simple tasks like writing and coding through various reasoning strategies. However, LLM agents still struggle with tasks that require comprehensive planning, a process that challenges current models and remains a critical research issue. In this study, we concentrate on travel planning, a Multi-Phases planning problem, that involves multiple interconnected stages, such as outlining, information gathering, and planning, often characterized by the need to manage various constraints and uncertainties. Existing reasoning approaches have struggled to effectively address this complex task. Our research aims to address this challenge by developing a human-like planning framework for LLM agents, i.e., guiding the LLM agent to simulate various steps that humans take when solving Multi-Phases problems. Specifically, we implement several strategies to enable LLM agents to generate a coherent outline for each travel query, mirroring human planning patterns. Additionally, we integrate Strategy Block and Knowledge Block into our framework: Strategy Block facilitates information collection, while Knowledge Block provides essential information for detailed planning. Through our extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our framework significantly improves the planning capabilities of LLM agents, enabling them to tackle the travel planning task with improved efficiency and effectiveness. Our experimental results showcase the exceptional performance of the proposed framework; when combined with GPT-4-Turbo, it attains $10\times$ the performance gains in comparison to the baseline framework deployed on GPT-4-Turbo.
Related papers
- Interactive and Expressive Code-Augmented Planning with Large Language Models [62.799579304821826]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong abilities in common-sense reasoning and interactive decision-making.
Recent techniques have sought to structure LLM outputs using control flow and other code-adjacent techniques to improve planning performance.
We propose REPL-Plan, an LLM planning approach that is fully code-expressive and dynamic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T04:23:17Z) - Planning Anything with Rigor: General-Purpose Zero-Shot Planning with LLM-based Formalized Programming [13.246017517159043]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated strong potential in solving planning problems.
We propose LLpreview, a framework that leverages LLMs to capture key information from planning problems and formally formulate and solve them as optimization problems from scratch.
We apply LLpreview to 9 planning problems, ranging from multi-constraint decision making to multi-step planning problems, and demonstrate that LLpreview achieves on average 83.7% and 86.8% optimal rate across 9 tasks for GPTo and Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T23:20:54Z) - Unlocking Reasoning Potential in Large Langauge Models by Scaling Code-form Planning [94.76546523689113]
We introduce CodePlan, a framework that generates and follows textcode-form plans -- pseudocode that outlines high-level, structured reasoning processes.
CodePlan effectively captures the rich semantics and control flows inherent to sophisticated reasoning tasks.
It achieves a 25.1% relative improvement compared with directly generating responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-19T04:13:58Z) - Scaling Up Natural Language Understanding for Multi-Robots Through the Lens of Hierarchy [8.180994118420053]
Long-horizon planning is hindered by challenges such as uncertainty accumulation, computational complexity, delayed rewards and incomplete information.
This work proposes an approach to exploit the task hierarchy from human instructions to facilitate multi-robot planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T14:46:13Z) - Learning to Plan for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models from Knowledge Graphs [59.76268575344119]
We introduce a novel framework for enhancing large language models' (LLMs) planning capabilities by using planning data derived from knowledge graphs (KGs)
LLMs fine-tuned with KG data have improved planning capabilities, better equipping them to handle complex QA tasks that involve retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T13:07:38Z) - Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios.
We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z) - Enhancing the General Agent Capabilities of Low-Parameter LLMs through Tuning and Multi-Branch Reasoning [56.82041895921434]
Open-source pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong language understanding and generation capabilities.
When used as agents for dealing with complex problems in the real world, their performance is far inferior to large commercial models such as ChatGPT and GPT-4.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-29T03:48:12Z) - Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey [98.82513390811148]
This survey provides the first systematic view of LLM-based agents planning, covering recent works aiming to improve planning ability.
Comprehensive analyses are conducted for each direction, and further challenges in the field of research are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T04:25:24Z) - Improving Planning with Large Language Models: A Modular Agentic Architecture [7.63815864256878]
Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with tasks that require multi-step reasoning or goal-directed planning.
We propose an agentic architecture, the Modular Agentic Planner (MAP), in which planning is accomplished via the recurrent interaction of specialized modules.
We find that MAP yields significant improvements over both standard LLM methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-30T00:10:14Z) - Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated
Planning [24.37599752610625]
The study seeks to shed light on the capabilities of LLMs in solving complex planning problems.
It provides insights into the most effective approaches for using LLMs in this context.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T15:21:09Z) - Plansformer: Generating Symbolic Plans using Transformers [24.375997526106246]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been the subject of active research, significantly advancing the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP)
We introduce Plansformer; an LLM fine-tuned on planning problems and capable of generating plans with favorable behavior in terms of correctness and length with reduced knowledge-engineering efforts.
For one configuration of Plansformer, we achieve 97% valid plans, out of which 95% are optimal for Towers of Hanoi - a puzzle-solving domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T19:06:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.