Strategies to Counter Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement: Cross-Country Comparison of Citizens in Greece, Italy and Spain

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19970v1
• Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 11:55:10 GMT
• Title: Strategies to Counter Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement: Cross-Country Comparison of Citizens in Greece, Italy and Spain
• Authors: Petra Saskia Bayerl, Babak Akhgar, Ernesto La Mattina, Barbara Pirillo, Ioana Cotoi, Davide Ariu, Matteo Mauri, Jorge Garcia, Dimitris Kavallieros, Antonia Kardara, Konstantina Karagiorgou,
• Abstract summary: This paper investigates citizens' counter-strategies to the use of Artificial Intelligence by law enforcement agencies (LEAs) Based on information from three countries (Greece, Italy and Spain) we demonstrate disparities in the likelihood of ten specific counter-strategies.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates citizens' counter-strategies to the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by law enforcement agencies (LEAs). Based on information from three countries (Greece, Italy and Spain) we demonstrate disparities in the likelihood of ten specific counter-strategies. We further identified factors that increase the propensity for counter-strategies. Our study provides an important new perspective to societal impacts of security-focused AI applications by illustrating the conscious, strategic choices by citizens when confronted with AI capabilities for LEAs.

Related papers

• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations [0.0]
  Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, yet its adoption is often hindered by concerns about data privacy, security, and the understanding of AI capabilities. This paper synthesizes AI governance approaches, strategic themes, and enablers and challenges for AI adoption by reviewing national AI strategies from leading nations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:00:42Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors [1.1060425537315088]
  This paper explores how artificial intelligence (AI) may impact the strategic decision-making (SDM) process in firms. We illustrate how AI could augment existing SDM tools and provide empirical evidence from a leading accelerator program and a startup competition. We examine implications for key cognitive processes underlying SDM -- search, representation, and aggregation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T15:46:15Z)
• Combining AI Control Systems and Human Decision Support via Robustness and Criticality [53.10194953873209]
  We extend a methodology for adversarial explanations (AE) to state-of-the-art reinforcement learning frameworks. We show that the learned AI control system demonstrates robustness against adversarial tampering. In a training / learning framework, this technology can improve both the AI's decisions and explanations through human interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T15:38:57Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• Artificial Intelligence across Europe: A Study on Awareness, Attitude and Trust [39.35990066478082]
  The aim of the study is to gain a better understanding of people's views and perceptions within the European context. We design and validate a new questionnaire (PAICE) structured around three dimensions: people's awareness, attitude, and trust. We highlight implicit contradictions and identify trends that may interfere with the creation of an ecosystem of trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T11:00:32Z)
• Citizen Perspectives on Necessary Safeguards to the Use of AI by Law Enforcement Agencies [0.0]
  This study explores the views of 111 citizens towards AI use by police through interviews. It integrates societal concerns along with propositions of safeguards from negative effects of AI use by LEAs in the context of cybercrime and terrorism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T12:26:34Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• The Role of Large Language Models in the Recognition of Territorial Sovereignty: An Analysis of the Construction of Legitimacy [67.44950222243865]
  We argue that technology tools like Google Maps and Large Language Models (LLM) are often perceived as impartial and objective. We highlight the case of three controversial territories: Crimea, West Bank and Transnitria, by comparing the responses of ChatGPT against Wikipedia information and United Nations resolutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-17T08:46:49Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• European Strategy on AI: Are we truly fostering social good? [1.7849339006560667]
  The European Commission introduced its AI strategy able to compete in the next years with world powers such as China and US. Most of the Member States have published their own National Strategy with the aim to work on a coordinated plan for Europe. This paper reports the main findings of a qualitative analysis of the investment plans reported in 15 European National Strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-25T16:39:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.