European Strategy on AI: Are we truly fostering social good?
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.12863v1
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 16:39:12 GMT
- Title: European Strategy on AI: Are we truly fostering social good?
- Authors: Francesca Foffano, Teresa Scantamburlo, Atia Cort\'es, and Chiara
Bissolo
- Abstract summary: The European Commission introduced its AI strategy able to compete in the next years with world powers such as China and US.
Most of the Member States have published their own National Strategy with the aim to work on a coordinated plan for Europe.
This paper reports the main findings of a qualitative analysis of the investment plans reported in 15 European National Strategies.
- Score: 1.7849339006560667
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is already part of our daily lives and is
playing a key role in defining the economic and social shape of the future. In
2018, the European Commission introduced its AI strategy able to compete in the
next years with world powers such as China and US, but relying on the respect
of European values and fundamental rights. As a result, most of the Member
States have published their own National Strategy with the aim to work on a
coordinated plan for Europe. In this paper, we present an ongoing study on how
European countries are approaching the field of Artificial Intelligence, with
its promises and risks, through the lens of their national AI strategies. In
particular, we aim to investigate how European countries are investing in AI
and to what extent the stated plans can contribute to the benefit of the whole
society. This paper reports the main findings of a qualitative analysis of the
investment plans reported in 15 European National Strategies
Related papers
- Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - Strategic AI Governance: Insights from Leading Nations [0.0]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize various sectors, yet its adoption is often hindered by concerns about data privacy, security, and the understanding of AI capabilities.
This paper synthesizes AI governance approaches, strategic themes, and enablers and challenges for AI adoption by reviewing national AI strategies from leading nations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T06:00:42Z) - Strategies to Counter Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement: Cross-Country Comparison of Citizens in Greece, Italy and Spain [0.0]
This paper investigates citizens' counter-strategies to the use of Artificial Intelligence by law enforcement agencies (LEAs)
Based on information from three countries (Greece, Italy and Spain) we demonstrate disparities in the likelihood of ten specific counter-strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T11:55:10Z) - Now, Later, and Lasting: Ten Priorities for AI Research, Policy, and Practice [63.20307830884542]
Next several decades may well be a turning point for humanity, comparable to the industrial revolution.
Launched a decade ago, the project is committed to a perpetual series of studies by multidisciplinary experts.
We offer ten recommendations for action that collectively address both the short- and long-term potential impacts of AI technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T22:18:31Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - Artificial Intelligence across Europe: A Study on Awareness, Attitude
and Trust [39.35990066478082]
The aim of the study is to gain a better understanding of people's views and perceptions within the European context.
We design and validate a new questionnaire (PAICE) structured around three dimensions: people's awareness, attitude, and trust.
We highlight implicit contradictions and identify trends that may interfere with the creation of an ecosystem of trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-19T11:00:32Z) - Optimizing National Security Strategies through LLM-Driven Artificial
Intelligence Integration [0.0]
We will examine the United States progress in AI and ML from a military standpoint.
We will highlight the strategic significance of AI to national security and a set of strategic imperatives for military leaders and policymakers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-07T21:51:39Z) - The Role of Large Language Models in the Recognition of Territorial
Sovereignty: An Analysis of the Construction of Legitimacy [67.44950222243865]
We argue that technology tools like Google Maps and Large Language Models (LLM) are often perceived as impartial and objective.
We highlight the case of three controversial territories: Crimea, West Bank and Transnitria, by comparing the responses of ChatGPT against Wikipedia information and United Nations resolutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-17T08:46:49Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Montreal AI Ethics Institute's Response to Scotland's AI Strategy [0.0]
In January and February 2020, the Scottish Government released two documents for review by the public regarding their artificial intelligence (AI) strategy.
The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) reviewed these documents and published a response on 4 June 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T10:08:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.