Statistical Properties of Robust Satisficing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20451v1
• Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 19:57:28 GMT
• Title: Statistical Properties of Robust Satisficing
• Authors: Zhiyi Li, Yunbei Xu, Ruohan Zhan,
• Abstract summary: The Robust Satisficing (RS) model is an emerging approach to robust optimization. This paper comprehensively analyzes the theoretical properties of the RS model. Our experiments show that the RS model consistently outperforms the baseline empirical risk in small-sample regimes.
• Score: 5.0139295307605325
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Robust Satisficing (RS) model is an emerging approach to robust optimization, offering streamlined procedures and robust generalization across various applications. However, the statistical theory of RS remains unexplored in the literature. This paper fills in the gap by comprehensively analyzing the theoretical properties of the RS model. Notably, the RS structure offers a more straightforward path to deriving statistical guarantees compared to the seminal Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), resulting in a richer set of results. In particular, we establish two-sided confidence intervals for the optimal loss without the need to solve a minimax optimization problem explicitly. We further provide finite-sample generalization error bounds for the RS optimizer. Importantly, our results extend to scenarios involving distribution shifts, where discrepancies exist between the sampling and target distributions. Our numerical experiments show that the RS model consistently outperforms the baseline empirical risk minimization in small-sample regimes and under distribution shifts. Furthermore, compared to the DRO model, the RS model exhibits lower sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning, highlighting its practicability for robustness considerations.

Related papers

• Distributionally Robust Optimization as a Scalable Framework to Characterize Extreme Value Distributions [22.765095010254118]
  The goal of this paper is to develop distributionally robust optimization (DRO) estimators, specifically for multidimensional Extreme Value Theory (EVT) statistics. In order to mitigate over-conservative estimates while enhancing out-of-sample performance, we study DRO estimators informed by semi-parametric max-stable constraints in the space of point processes. Both approaches are validated using synthetically generated data, recovering prescribed characteristics, and verifying the efficacy of the proposed techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T19:45:27Z)
• Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.24821214671497]
  Training machine learning and statistical models often involve optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. We propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T21:19:15Z)
• The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model [61.87673435273466]
  This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimize the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T02:32:03Z)
• Optimization of Annealed Importance Sampling Hyperparameters [77.34726150561087]
  Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) is a popular algorithm used to estimates the intractable marginal likelihood of deep generative models. We present a parameteric AIS process with flexible intermediary distributions and optimize the bridging distributions to use fewer number of steps for sampling. We assess the performance of our optimized AIS for marginal likelihood estimation of deep generative models and compare it to other estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T07:58:25Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multi-Output Regression Ranking [3.9318191265352196]
  We introduce a new listwise listwise learning-to-rank model called Distributionally Robust Multi-output Regression Ranking (DRMRR) DRMRR uses a Distributionally Robust Optimization framework to minimize a multi-output loss function under the most adverse distributions in the neighborhood of the empirical data distribution. Our experiments were conducted on two real-world applications, medical document retrieval, and drug response prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T05:19:27Z)
• Federated Distributionally Robust Optimization for Phase Configuration of RISs [106.4688072667105]
  We study the problem of robust reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided downlink communication over heterogeneous RIS types in a supervised learning setting. By modeling downlink communication over heterogeneous RIS designs as different workers that learn how to optimize phase configurations in a distributed manner, we solve this distributed learning problem. Our proposed algorithm requires fewer communication rounds to achieve the same worst-case distribution test accuracy compared to competitive baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T07:07:45Z)
• Complexity-Free Generalization via Distributionally Robust Optimization [4.313143197674466]
  We present an alternate route to obtain generalization bounds on the solution from distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our DRO bounds depend on the ambiguity set geometry and its compatibility with the true loss function. Notably, when using maximum mean discrepancy as a DRO distance metric, our analysis implies, to the best of our knowledge, the first generalization bound in the literature that depends solely on the true loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-21T15:19:52Z)
• Fast Distributionally Robust Learning with Variance Reduced Min-Max Optimization [85.84019017587477]
  Distributionally robust supervised learning is emerging as a key paradigm for building reliable machine learning systems for real-world applications. Existing algorithms for solving Wasserstein DRSL involve solving complex subproblems or fail to make use of gradients. We revisit Wasserstein DRSL through the lens of min-max optimization and derive scalable and efficiently implementable extra-gradient algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T16:56:09Z)
• Modeling the Second Player in Distributionally Robust Optimization [90.25995710696425]
  We argue for the use of neural generative models to characterize the worst-case distribution. This approach poses a number of implementation and optimization challenges. We find that the proposed approach yields models that are more robust than comparable baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T14:26:26Z)
• Residuals-based distributionally robust optimization with covariate information [0.0]
  We consider data-driven approaches that integrate a machine learning prediction model within distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our framework is flexible in the sense that it can accommodate a variety of learning setups and DRO ambiguity sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T11:21:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.