SPOT: Text Source Prediction from Originality Score Thresholding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20505v1
• Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 21:51:01 GMT
• Title: SPOT: Text Source Prediction from Originality Score Thresholding
• Authors: Edouard Yvinec, Gabriel Kasser,
• Abstract summary: countermeasures aim at detecting misinformation, usually involve domain specific models trained to recognize the relevance of any information. Instead of evaluating the validity of the information, we propose to investigate LLM generated text from the perspective of trust.
• Score: 6.790905400046194
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: The wide acceptance of large language models (LLMs) has unlocked new applications and social risks. Popular countermeasures aim at detecting misinformation, usually involve domain specific models trained to recognize the relevance of any information. Instead of evaluating the validity of the information, we propose to investigate LLM generated text from the perspective of trust. In this study, we define trust as the ability to know if an input text was generated by a LLM or a human. To do so, we design SPOT, an efficient method, that classifies the source of any, standalone, text input based on originality score. This score is derived from the prediction of a given LLM to detect other LLMs. We empirically demonstrate the robustness of the method to the architecture, training data, evaluation data, task and compression of modern LLMs.

Related papers

• Robust Detection of LLM-Generated Text: A Comparative Analysis [0.276240219662896]
  Large language models can be widely integrated into many aspects of life, and their output can quickly fill all network resources. It becomes increasingly important to develop powerful detectors for the generated text. This detector is essential to prevent the potential misuse of these technologies and to protect areas such as social media from the negative effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T18:27:15Z)
• A Bayesian Approach to Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Authorship Attribution [57.309390098903]
  Authorship attribution aims to identify the origin or author of a document. Large Language Models (LLMs) with their deep reasoning capabilities and ability to maintain long-range textual associations offer a promising alternative. Our results on the IMDb and blog datasets show an impressive 85% accuracy in one-shot authorship classification across ten authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T04:14:23Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations [55.06804460642062]
  Large language models (LLMs) generate human-preferable texts. In this paper, we identify the common characteristics shared by these models. We propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T17:38:33Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models Using Their Generations Only [44.26441565763495]
  APRICOT is a method to set confidence targets and train an additional model that predicts an LLM's confidence based on its textual input and output alone. It is conceptually simple, does not require access to the target model beyond its output, does not interfere with the language generation, and has a multitude of potential usages. We show how our approach performs competitively in terms of calibration error for white-box and black-box LLMs on closed-book question-answering to detect incorrect LLM answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T17:46:24Z)
• LLM-Detector: Improving AI-Generated Chinese Text Detection with Open-Source LLM Instruction Tuning [4.328134379418151]
  Existing AI-generated text detection models are prone to in-domain over-fitting. We propose LLM-Detector, a novel method for both document-level and sentence-level text detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T05:54:12Z)
• Generative Context-aware Fine-tuning of Self-supervised Speech Models [54.389711404209415]
  We study the use of generative large language models (LLM) generated context information. We propose an approach to distill the generated information during fine-tuning of self-supervised speech models. We evaluate the proposed approach using the SLUE and Libri-light benchmarks for several downstream tasks: automatic speech recognition, named entity recognition, and sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T15:46:02Z)
• Assessing the Reliability of Large Language Model Knowledge [78.38870272050106]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been treated as knowledge bases due to their strong performance in knowledge probing tasks. How do we evaluate the capabilities of LLMs to consistently produce factually correct answers? We propose MOdel kNowledge relIabiliTy scORe (MONITOR), a novel metric designed to directly measure LLMs' factual reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T12:40:30Z)
• LLMDet: A Third Party Large Language Models Generated Text Detection Tool [119.0952092533317]
  Large language models (LLMs) are remarkably close to high-quality human-authored text. Existing detection tools can only differentiate between machine-generated and human-authored text. We propose LLMDet, a model-specific, secure, efficient, and extendable detection tool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:16Z)
• Statistical Knowledge Assessment for Large Language Models [79.07989821512128]
  Given varying prompts regarding a factoid question, can a large language model (LLM) reliably generate factually correct answers? We propose KaRR, a statistical approach to assess factual knowledge for LLMs. Our results reveal that the knowledge in LLMs with the same backbone architecture adheres to the scaling law, while tuning on instruction-following data sometimes compromises the model's capability to generate factually correct text reliably.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T18:54:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.