Principal-Agent Multitasking: the Uniformity of Optimal Contracts and its Efficient Learning via Instrumental Regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.20642v1
• Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 07:01:49 GMT
• Title: Principal-Agent Multitasking: the Uniformity of Optimal Contracts and its Efficient Learning via Instrumental Regression
• Authors: Shiliang Zuo,
• Abstract summary: This work studies the multitasking principal-agent problem. I first show a uniformity'' result. I then study a setting where the marginal utility of each task is unknown.
• Score: 2.296475290901356
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This work studies the multitasking principal-agent problem. I first show a ``uniformity'' result. Specifically, when the tasks are perfect substitutes, and the agent's cost function is homogeneous to a certain degree, then the optimal contract only depends on the marginal utility of each task and the degree of homogeneity. I then study a setting where the marginal utility of each task is unknown so that the optimal contract must be learned or estimated with observational data. I identify this problem as a regression problem with measurement errors and observe that this problem can be cast as an instrumental regression problem. The current works observe that both the contract and the repeated observations (when available) can act as valid instrumental variables, and propose using the generalized method of moments estimator to compute an approximately optimal contract from offline data. I also study an online setting and show how the optimal contract can be efficiently learned in an online fashion using the two estimators. Here the principal faces an exploration-exploitation tradeoff: she must experiment with new contracts and observe their outcome whilst at the same time ensuring her experimentations are not deviating too much from the optimal contract. This work shows when repeated observations are available and agents are sufficiently ``diverse", the principal can achieve a very low $\widetilde{O}(d)$ cumulative utility loss, even with a ``pure exploitation" algorithm.

Related papers

• New Perspectives in Online Contract Design [2.296475290901356]
  This work studies the repeated principal-agent problem from an online learning perspective. The principal's goal is to learn the optimal contract that maximizes her utility through repeated interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T20:28:23Z)
• Online non-parametric likelihood-ratio estimation by Pearson-divergence functional minimization [55.98760097296213]
  We introduce a new framework for online non-parametric LRE (OLRE) for the setting where pairs of iid observations $(x_t sim p, x'_t sim q)$ are observed over time. We provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of the OLRE method along with empirical validation in synthetic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:20:11Z)
• Multi-task Bias-Variance Trade-off Through Functional Constraints [102.64082402388192]
  Multi-task learning aims to acquire a set of functions that perform well for diverse tasks. In this paper we draw intuition from the two extreme learning scenarios -- a single function for all tasks, and a task-specific function that ignores the other tasks. We introduce a constrained learning formulation that enforces domain specific solutions to a central function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T16:06:47Z)
• An Experimental Design Perspective on Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [73.37942845983417]
  In practical applications of RL, it is expensive to observe state transitions from the environment. We propose an acquisition function that quantifies how much information a state-action pair would provide about the optimal solution to a Markov decision process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T23:13:57Z)
• Measuring Model Fairness under Noisy Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective [26.704446184314506]
  We study the problem of measuring the fairness of a machine learning model under noisy information. We present a theoretical analysis that aims to characterize weaker conditions under which accurate fairness evaluation is possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T18:36:28Z)
• How to distribute data across tasks for meta-learning? [59.608652082495624]
  We show that the optimal number of data points per task depends on the budget, but it converges to a unique constant value for large budgets. Our results suggest a simple and efficient procedure for data collection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T15:38:47Z)
• Online Apprenticeship Learning [58.45089581278177]
  In Apprenticeship Learning (AL), we are given a Markov Decision Process (MDP) without access to the cost function. The goal is to find a policy that matches the expert's performance on some predefined set of cost functions. We show that the OAL problem can be effectively solved by combining two mirror descent based no-regret algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-13T12:57:51Z)
• Robust Meta-learning for Mixed Linear Regression with Small Batches [34.94138630547603]
  We study a fundamental question: can abundant small-data tasks compensate for the lack of big-data tasks? Existing approaches show that such a trade-off is efficiently achievable, with the help of medium-sized tasks with $Omega(k1/2)$ examples each. We introduce a spectral approach that is simultaneously robust under both scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T07:59:05Z)
• Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning as a Model of Human Task Interleaving [60.95424607008241]
  We develop a hierarchical model of supervisory control driven by reinforcement learning. The model reproduces known empirical effects of task interleaving. The results support hierarchical RL as a plausible model of task interleaving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-04T17:53:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.