The Pseudo-Dimension of Contracts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14474v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 13:13:50 GMT
• Title: The Pseudo-Dimension of Contracts
• Authors: Paul Duetting, Michal Feldman, Tomasz Ponitka, Ermis Soumalias,
• Abstract summary: Algorithmic contract design studies scenarios where a principal incentivizes an agent to exert effort on her behalf. In this work, we focus on settings where the agent's type is drawn from an unknown distribution, and an offline learning framework for learning near-optimal contracts from sample agent types. A central tool in our analysis is the notion of pseudo-dimension from statistical learning theory.
• Score: 8.710927418537908
• License:
• Abstract: Algorithmic contract design studies scenarios where a principal incentivizes an agent to exert effort on her behalf. In this work, we focus on settings where the agent's type is drawn from an unknown distribution, and formalize an offline learning framework for learning near-optimal contracts from sample agent types. A central tool in our analysis is the notion of pseudo-dimension from statistical learning theory. Beyond its role in establishing upper bounds on the sample complexity, pseudo-dimension measures the intrinsic complexity of a class of contracts, offering a new perspective on the tradeoffs between simplicity and optimality in contract design. Our main results provide essentially optimal tradeoffs between pseudo-dimension and representation error (defined as the loss in principal's utility) with respect to linear and bounded contracts. Using these tradeoffs, we derive sample- and time-efficient learning algorithms, and demonstrate their near-optimality by providing almost matching lower bounds on the sample complexity. Conversely, for unbounded contracts, we prove an impossibility result showing that no learning algorithm exists. Finally, we extend our techniques in three important ways. First, we provide refined pseudo-dimension and sample complexity guarantees for the combinatorial actions model, revealing a novel connection between the number of critical values and sample complexity. Second, we extend our results to menus of contracts, showing that their pseudo-dimension scales linearly with the menu size. Third, we adapt our algorithms to the online learning setting, where we show that, a polynomial number of type samples suffice to learn near-optimal bounded contracts. Combined with prior work, this establishes a formal separation between expert advice and bandit feedback for this setting.

Related papers

• Contractual Reinforcement Learning: Pulling Arms with Invisible Hands [68.77645200579181]
  We propose a theoretical framework for aligning economic interests of different stakeholders in the online learning problems through contract design. For the planning problem, we design an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to determine the optimal contracts against the far-sighted agent. For the learning problem, we introduce a generic design of no-regret learning algorithms to untangle the challenges from robust design of contracts to the balance of exploration and exploitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:53:00Z)
• New Perspectives in Online Contract Design [2.296475290901356]
  This work studies the repeated principal-agent problem from an online learning perspective. The principal's goal is to learn the optimal contract that maximizes her utility through repeated interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T20:28:23Z)
• Are Bounded Contracts Learnable and Approximately Optimal? [8.121834515103243]
  This paper considers the hidden-action model of the principal-agent problem, in which a principal incentivizes an agent to work on a project using a contract. We investigate whether contracts with bounded payments are learnable and approximately optimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T12:19:19Z)
• RGM: A Robust Generalizable Matching Model [49.60975442871967]
  We propose a deep model for sparse and dense matching, termed RGM (Robust Generalist Matching) To narrow the gap between synthetic training samples and real-world scenarios, we build a new, large-scale dataset with sparse correspondence ground truth. We are able to mix up various dense and sparse matching datasets, significantly improving the training diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T07:30:08Z)
• Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learning [67.0537668772372]
  Motivated by the emergence of decentralized machine learning (ML) ecosystems, we study the delegation of data collection. We design optimal and near-optimal contracts that deal with two fundamental information asymmetries. We show that a principal can cope with such asymmetry via simple linear contracts that achieve 1-1/e fraction of the optimal utility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-04T22:16:35Z)
• Faster Adaptive Federated Learning [84.38913517122619]
  Federated learning has attracted increasing attention with the emergence of distributed data. In this paper, we propose an efficient adaptive algorithm (i.e., FAFED) based on momentum-based variance reduced technique in cross-silo FL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-02T05:07:50Z)
• On-Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions [63.20009081099896]
  Social and real-world considerations have given rise to multi-distribution learning paradigms. We establish the optimal sample complexity of these learning paradigms and give algorithms that meet this sample complexity. Our algorithm design and analysis are enabled by our extensions of online learning techniques for solving zero-sum games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-22T19:07:26Z)
• Improved Robust Algorithms for Learning with Discriminative Feature Feedback [21.58493386054356]
  Discriminative Feature Feedback is a protocol for interactive learning based on feature explanations that are provided by a human teacher. We provide new robust interactive learning algorithms for the Discriminative Feature Feedback model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T12:11:12Z)
• Byzantine Resilient Distributed Multi-Task Learning [6.850757447639822]
  We show that distributed algorithms for learning relatedness among tasks are not resilient in the presence of Byzantine agents. We propose an approach for Byzantine resilient distributed multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T04:32:52Z)
• An Empirical Process Approach to the Union Bound: Practical Algorithms for Combinatorial and Linear Bandits [34.06611065493047]
  This paper proposes near-optimal algorithms for the pure-exploration linear bandit problem in the fixed confidence and fixed budget settings. We provide an algorithm whose sample complexity scales with the geometry of the instance and avoids an explicit union bound over the number of arms. We also propose the first algorithm for linear bandits in the the fixed budget setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T00:56:33Z)
• The Simulator: Understanding Adaptive Sampling in the Moderate-Confidence Regime [52.38455827779212]
  We propose a novel technique for analyzing adaptive sampling called the em Simulator. We prove the first instance-based lower bounds the top-k problem which incorporate the appropriate log-factors. Our new analysis inspires a simple and near-optimal for the best-arm and top-k identification, the first em practical of its kind for the latter problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-02-16T23:42:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.