Measuring Model Fairness under Noisy Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.09985v1
• Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 18:36:28 GMT
• Title: Measuring Model Fairness under Noisy Covariates: A Theoretical Perspective
• Authors: Flavien Prost, Pranjal Awasthi, Nick Blumm, Aditee Kumthekar, Trevor Potter, Li Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Ed H. Chi, Jilin Chen, Alex Beutel
• Abstract summary: We study the problem of measuring the fairness of a machine learning model under noisy information. We present a theoretical analysis that aims to characterize weaker conditions under which accurate fairness evaluation is possible.
• Score: 26.704446184314506
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this work we study the problem of measuring the fairness of a machine learning model under noisy information. Focusing on group fairness metrics, we investigate the particular but common situation when the evaluation requires controlling for the confounding effect of covariate variables. In a practical setting, we might not be able to jointly observe the covariate and group information, and a standard workaround is to then use proxies for one or more of these variables. Prior works have demonstrated the challenges with using a proxy for sensitive attributes, and strong independence assumptions are needed to provide guarantees on the accuracy of the noisy estimates. In contrast, in this work we study using a proxy for the covariate variable and present a theoretical analysis that aims to characterize weaker conditions under which accurate fairness evaluation is possible. Furthermore, our theory identifies potential sources of errors and decouples them into two interpretable parts $\gamma$ and $\epsilon$. The first part $\gamma$ depends solely on the performance of the proxy such as precision and recall, whereas the second part $\epsilon$ captures correlations between all the variables of interest. We show that in many scenarios the error in the estimates is dominated by $\gamma$ via a linear dependence, whereas the dependence on the correlations $\epsilon$ only constitutes a lower order term. As a result we expand the understanding of scenarios where measuring model fairness via proxies can be an effective approach. Finally, we compare, via simulations, the theoretical upper-bounds to the distribution of simulated estimation errors and show that assuming some structure on the data, even weak, is key to significantly improve both theoretical guarantees and empirical results.

Related papers

• MANO: Exploiting Matrix Norm for Unsupervised Accuracy Estimation Under Distribution Shifts [25.643876327918544]
  Leveraging the models' outputs, specifically the logits, is a common approach to estimating the test accuracy of a pre-trained neural network on out-of-distribution samples. Despite their ease of implementation and computational efficiency, current logit-based methods are vulnerable to overconfidence issues, leading to prediction bias. We propose MaNo which applies a data-dependent normalization on the logits to reduce prediction bias and takes the $L_p$ norm of the matrix of normalized logits as the estimation score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T10:45:06Z)
• Online non-parametric likelihood-ratio estimation by Pearson-divergence functional minimization [55.98760097296213]
  We introduce a new framework for online non-parametric LRE (OLRE) for the setting where pairs of iid observations $(x_t sim p, x'_t sim q)$ are observed over time. We provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of the OLRE method along with empirical validation in synthetic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:20:11Z)
• Advancing Counterfactual Inference through Nonlinear Quantile Regression [77.28323341329461]
  We propose a framework for efficient and effective counterfactual inference implemented with neural networks. The proposed approach enhances the capacity to generalize estimated counterfactual outcomes to unseen data. Empirical results conducted on multiple datasets offer compelling support for our theoretical assertions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T08:30:51Z)
• Birds of a Feather Trust Together: Knowing When to Trust a Classifier via Adaptive Neighborhood Aggregation [30.34223543030105]
  We show how NeighborAgg can leverage the two essential information via an adaptive neighborhood aggregation. We also extend our approach to the closely related task of mislabel detection and provide a theoretical coverage guarantee to bound the false negative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T18:43:15Z)
• Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustness [48.44639585732391]
  In practice, models need to enjoy both types of robustness to ensure reliability. In this work, we show that in fact, explicit tradeoffs exist between adversarial and natural distributional robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-15T19:58:01Z)
• On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networks [23.502721524477444]
  We present a synthetic example illustrating how this approach can lead to very poor but stable estimates. We identify the culprit to be the log-likelihood loss, along with certain conditions that exacerbate the issue. We present an alternative formulation, termed $beta$-NLL, in which each data point's contribution to the loss is weighted by the $beta$-exponentiated variance estimate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T08:46:17Z)
• Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learning [99.34907092347733]
  We analyze the problem of estimating optimal $Q$-value functions for a discounted Markov decision process with discrete states and actions. Using a local minimax framework, we show that this functional arises in lower bounds on the accuracy on any estimation procedure. In the other direction, we establish the sharpness of our lower bounds, up to factors logarithmic in the state and action spaces, by analyzing a variance-reduced version of $Q$-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T00:38:54Z)
• Fundamental Limits and Tradeoffs in Invariant Representation Learning [99.2368462915979]
  Many machine learning applications involve learning representations that achieve two competing goals. Minimax game-theoretic formulation represents a fundamental tradeoff between accuracy and invariance. We provide an information-theoretic analysis of this general and important problem under both classification and regression settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T15:24:04Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Adversarial Robustness of Supervised Sparse Coding [34.94566482399662]
  We consider a model that involves learning a representation while at the same time giving a precise generalization bound and a robustness certificate. We focus on the hypothesis class obtained by combining a sparsity-promoting encoder coupled with a linear encoder. We provide a robustness certificate for end-to-end classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T22:05:21Z)
• The Counterfactual $\chi$-GAN [20.42556178617068]
  Causal inference often relies on the counterfactual framework, which requires that treatment assignment is independent of the outcome. This work proposes a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based model called the Counterfactual $chi$-GAN (cGAN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-09T17:23:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.