Judgement Citation Retrieval using Contextual Similarity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01609v2
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 06:11:27 GMT
• Title: Judgement Citation Retrieval using Contextual Similarity
• Authors: Akshat Mohan Dasula, Hrushitha Tigulla, Preethika Bhukya,
• Abstract summary: We propose a methodology that combines natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to enhance the organization and utilization of legal case descriptions. Our methodology addresses two primary objectives: unsupervised clustering and supervised citation retrieval. Our methodology achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 90.9%.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Traditionally in the domain of legal research, the retrieval of pertinent citations from intricate case descriptions has demanded manual effort and keyword-based search applications that mandate expertise in understanding legal jargon. Legal case descriptions hold pivotal information for legal professionals and researchers, necessitating more efficient and automated approaches. We propose a methodology that combines natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning techniques to enhance the organization and utilization of legal case descriptions. This approach revolves around the creation of textual embeddings with the help of state-of-art embedding models. Our methodology addresses two primary objectives: unsupervised clustering and supervised citation retrieval, both designed to automate the citation extraction process. Although the proposed methodology can be used for any dataset, we employed the Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS) dataset, yielding remarkable results. Our methodology achieved an impressive accuracy rate of 90.9%. By automating labor-intensive processes, we pave the way for a more efficient, time-saving, and accessible landscape in legal research, benefiting legal professionals, academics, and researchers.

Related papers

• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Automating Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Literature via LLMs: A Dual-Agent Approach with Progressive Ontology Prompting [59.97247234955861]
  We introduce a novel framework based on large language models (LLMs) that combines a progressive prompting algorithm with a dual-agent system, named LLM-Duo. Our method identifies 2,421 interventions from 64,177 research articles in the speech-language therapy domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:42:23Z)
• Empowering Prior to Court Legal Analysis: A Transparent and Accessible Dataset for Defensive Statement Classification and Interpretation [5.646219481667151]
  This paper introduces a novel dataset tailored for classification of statements made during police interviews, prior to court proceedings. We introduce a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. We also present an XAI interface that empowers both legal professionals and non-specialists to interact with and benefit from our system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T11:22:27Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• LLM vs. Lawyers: Identifying a Subset of Summary Judgments in a Large UK Case Law Dataset [0.0]
  This study addresses the gap in the literature working with large legal corpora about how to isolate cases, in our case summary judgments, from a large corpus of UK court decisions. We use the Cambridge Law Corpus of 356,011 UK court decisions and determine that the large language model achieves a weighted F1 score of 0.94 versus 0.78 for keywords. We identify and extract 3,102 summary judgment cases, enabling us to map their distribution across various UK courts over a temporal span.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T10:13:30Z)
• A Deep Learning-Based System for Automatic Case Summarization [2.9141777969894966]
  This paper presents a deep learning-based system for efficient automatic case summarization. The system offers both supervised and unsupervised methods to generate concise and relevant summaries of lengthy legal case documents. Future work will focus on refining summarization techniques and exploring the application of our methods to other types of legal texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T01:18:10Z)
• Combatting Human Trafficking in the Cyberspace: A Natural Language Processing-Based Methodology to Analyze the Language in Online Advertisements [55.2480439325792]
  This project tackles the pressing issue of human trafficking in online C2C marketplaces through advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. We introduce a novel methodology for generating pseudo-labeled datasets with minimal supervision, serving as a rich resource for training state-of-the-art NLP models. A key contribution is the implementation of an interpretability framework using Integrated Gradients, providing explainable insights crucial for law enforcement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T02:45:01Z)
• Datasets for Portuguese Legal Semantic Textual Similarity: Comparing weak supervision and an annotation process approaches [1.9244230111838758]
  Brazilian National Council of Justice has established in Resolution 469/2022 formal guidance for document and process digitalization. This article contributes with four datasets from the legal domain, two with documents and metadata but unlabeled, and another two labeled with a aiming at its use in textual similarity tasks. The analysis of ground truth labels highlights that semantic analysis of domain text can be challenging even for domain experts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T18:27:10Z)
• JNLP Team: Deep Learning Approaches for Legal Processing Tasks in COLIEE 2021 [1.8700700550095686]
  COLIEE is an annual competition in automatic computerized legal text processing. In this article, we report our methods and experimental results in using deep learning in legal document processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T03:31:12Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Procedural Text Understanding with Multi-Stage Training [110.93934567725826]
  We focus on the task of procedural text understanding, which aims to comprehend such documents and track entities' states and locations during a process. Two challenges, the difficulty of commonsense reasoning and data insufficiency, still remain unsolved. We propose a novel KnOwledge-Aware proceduraL text understAnding (KOALA) model, which effectively leverages multiple forms of external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T10:28:40Z)
• How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligence [81.04070052740596]
  Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI) focuses on applying the technology of artificial intelligence, especially natural language processing, to benefit tasks in the legal domain. This paper introduces the history, the current state, and the future directions of research in LegalAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T14:45:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.