Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02464v1
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:31:43 GMT
- Title: Meta-Learners for Partially-Identified Treatment Effects Across Multiple Environments
- Authors: Jonas Schweisthal, Dennis Frauen, Mihaela van der Schaar, Stefan Feuerriegel,
- Abstract summary: Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data is relevant for many applications such as personalized medicine.
Here, we focus on the widespread setting where the observational data come from multiple environments.
We propose different model-agnostic learners (so-called meta-learners) to estimate the bounds that can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models.
- Score: 67.80453452949303
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Estimating the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) from observational data is relevant for many applications such as personalized medicine. Here, we focus on the widespread setting where the observational data come from multiple environments, such as different hospitals, physicians, or countries. Furthermore, we allow for violations of standard causal assumptions, namely, overlap within the environments and unconfoundedness. To this end, we move away from point identification and focus on partial identification. Specifically, we show that current assumptions from the literature on multiple environments allow us to interpret the environment as an instrumental variable (IV). This allows us to adapt bounds from the IV literature for partial identification of CATE by leveraging treatment assignment mechanisms across environments. Then, we propose different model-agnostic learners (so-called meta-learners) to estimate the bounds that can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models. We further demonstrate the effectiveness of our meta-learners across various experiments using both simulated and real-world data. Finally, we discuss the applicability of our meta-learners to partial identification in instrumental variable settings, such as randomized controlled trials with non-compliance.
Related papers
- Estimating Individual Dose-Response Curves under Unobserved Confounders from Observational Data [6.166869525631879]
We present ContiVAE, a novel framework for estimating causal effects of continuous treatments, measured by individual dose-response curves.
We show that ContiVAE outperforms existing methods by up to 62%, demonstrating its robustness and flexibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T07:24:26Z) - Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions [0.0]
Estimating causal effect using machine learning (ML) algorithms can help to relax functional form assumptions if used within appropriate frameworks.
We show how we can adapt machine learning (DML) for panel data in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity.
We also show that the influence of the unobserved heterogeneity on the observed confounders plays a significant role for the performance of most alternative methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T13:59:54Z) - Model-agnostic meta-learners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects over time [24.91413609641092]
Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs) over time is crucial in many disciplines such as personalized medicine.
We propose several meta-learners that are model-agnostic and thus can be used in combination with arbitrary machine learning models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-07T07:07:48Z) - Seeing Unseen: Discover Novel Biomedical Concepts via
Geometry-Constrained Probabilistic Modeling [53.7117640028211]
We present a geometry-constrained probabilistic modeling treatment to resolve the identified issues.
We incorporate a suite of critical geometric properties to impose proper constraints on the layout of constructed embedding space.
A spectral graph-theoretic method is devised to estimate the number of potential novel classes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T00:56:05Z) - Conditionally Invariant Representation Learning for Disentangling
Cellular Heterogeneity [25.488181126364186]
This paper presents a novel approach that leverages domain variability to learn representations that are conditionally invariant to unwanted variability or distractors.
We apply our method to grand biological challenges, such as data integration in single-cell genomics.
Specifically, the proposed approach helps to disentangle biological signals from data biases that are unrelated to the target task or the causal explanation of interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-02T12:52:41Z) - DCID: Deep Canonical Information Decomposition [84.59396326810085]
We consider the problem of identifying the signal shared between two one-dimensional target variables.
We propose ICM, an evaluation metric which can be used in the presence of ground-truth labels.
We also propose Deep Canonical Information Decomposition (DCID) - a simple, yet effective approach for learning the shared variables.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-27T16:59:06Z) - Benchmarking Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Models through the Lens of
Interpretability [82.29775890542967]
Estimating personalized effects of treatments is a complex, yet pervasive problem.
Recent developments in the machine learning literature on heterogeneous treatment effect estimation gave rise to many sophisticated, but opaque, tools.
We use post-hoc feature importance methods to identify features that influence the model's predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-16T17:59:05Z) - Differentiable Invariant Causal Discovery [106.87950048845308]
Learning causal structure from observational data is a fundamental challenge in machine learning.
This paper proposes Differentiable Invariant Causal Discovery (DICD) to avoid learning spurious edges and wrong causal directions.
Extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets verify that DICD outperforms state-of-the-art causal discovery methods up to 36% in SHD.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T09:29:07Z) - MURAL: An Unsupervised Random Forest-Based Embedding for Electronic
Health Record Data [59.26381272149325]
We present an unsupervised random forest for representing data with disparate variable types.
MURAL forests consist of a set of decision trees where node-splitting variables are chosen at random.
We show that using our approach, we can visualize and classify data more accurately than competing approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-19T22:02:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.