Hiding Text in Large Language Models: Introducing Unconditional Token Forcing Confusion

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02481v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:49:06 GMT
• Title: Hiding Text in Large Language Models: Introducing Unconditional Token Forcing Confusion
• Authors: Jakub Hoscilowicz, Pawel Popiolek, Jan Rudkowski, Jedrzej Bieniasz, Artur Janicki,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach to extraction called Unconditional Token Forcing. We present a method to hide text in such a way as it is resistant to Unconditional Token Forcing.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the help of simple fine-tuning, one can artificially embed hidden text into large language models (LLMs). This text is revealed only when triggered by a specific query to the LLM. Two primary applications are LLM fingerprinting and steganography. In the context of LLM fingerprinting, a unique text identifier (fingerprint) is embedded within the model to verify licensing compliance. In the context of steganography, the LLM serves as a carrier for hidden messages that can be disclosed through a designated trigger. Our work demonstrates that embedding hidden text in the LLM via fine-tuning, though seemingly secure due to the vast number of potential triggers (any sequence of characters or tokens could serve as a trigger), is susceptible to extraction through analysis of the LLM's output decoding process. We propose a novel approach to extraction called Unconditional Token Forcing. It is premised on the hypothesis that iteratively feeding each token from the LLM's vocabulary into the model should reveal sequences with abnormally high token probabilities, indicating potential embedded text candidates. Additionally, our experiments show that when the first token of a hidden fingerprint is used as an input, the LLM not only produces an output sequence with high token probabilities, but also repetitively generates the fingerprint itself. We also present a method to hide text in such a way that it is resistant to Unconditional Token Forcing, which we named Unconditional Token Forcing Confusion.

Related papers

• Your Language Model Can Secretly Write Like Humans: Contrastive Paraphrase Attacks on LLM-Generated Text Detectors [65.27124213266491]
  We propose textbfContrastive textbfParaphrase textbfAttack (CoPA), a training-free method that effectively deceives text detectors.<n>CoPA constructs an auxiliary machine-like word distribution as a contrast to the human-like distribution generated by large language models.<n>Our theoretical analysis suggests the superiority of the proposed attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T10:08:39Z)
• Anti-adversarial Learning: Desensitizing Prompts for Large Language Models [13.674984661911607]
  We propose PromptObfus, a novel method for desensitizing LLM prompts.<n>The core idea of PromptObfus is "anti-adversarial" learning, which perturbs privacy words in the prompt to obscure sensitive information.<n>We show that PromptObfus effectively prevents privacy inference from remote LLMs while preserving task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T06:19:02Z)
• Idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models [54.26923012617675]
  We unveil and study idiosyncrasies in Large Language Models (LLMs) We find that fine-tuning existing text embedding models on LLM-generated texts yields excellent classification accuracy. We leverage LLM as judges to generate detailed, open-ended descriptions of each model's idiosyncrasies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:59:02Z)
• FDLLM: A Text Fingerprint Detection Method for LLMs in Multi-Language, Multi-Domain Black-Box Environments [18.755880639770755]
  Using large language models (LLMs) can lead to potential security risks. attackers may exploit this black-box scenario to deploy malicious models and embed viruses in the code provided to users. We propose the first LLMGT fingerprint detection model, textbfFDLLM, based on Qwen2.5-7B and fine-tuned using LoRA to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T13:18:40Z)
• Token Highlighter: Inspecting and Mitigating Jailbreak Prompts for Large Language Models [61.916827858666906]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into services such as ChatGPT to provide responses to user queries. This paper proposes a method called Token Highlighter to inspect and mitigate the potential jailbreak threats in the user query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T05:10:02Z)
• LLMmap: Fingerprinting For Large Language Models [15.726286532500971]
  With as few as 8 interactions, LLMmap can accurately identify 42 different LLM versions with over 95% accuracy. We discuss potential mitigations and demonstrate that, against resourceful adversaries, effective countermeasures may be challenging or even unrealizable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:59:45Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users. We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• Tokenization Matters! Degrading Large Language Models through Challenging Their Tokenization [12.885866125783618]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) tend to produce inaccurate responses to specific queries. We construct an adversarial dataset, named as $textbfADT (Adrial dataset for Tokenizer)$ to challenge LLMs' tokenization. Our empirical results reveal that our ADT is highly effective on challenging the tokenization of leading LLMs, including GPT-4o, Llama-3, Qwen2.5-max and so on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-27T11:39:59Z)
• DrAttack: Prompt Decomposition and Reconstruction Makes Powerful LLM Jailbreakers [74.7446827091938]
  We introduce an automatic prompt textbfDecomposition and textbfReconstruction framework for jailbreak textbfAttack (DrAttack) DrAttack includes three key components: (a) Decomposition' of the original prompt into sub-prompts, (b) Reconstruction' of these sub-prompts implicitly by in-context learning with semantically similar but harmless reassembling demo, and (c) a Synonym Search' of sub-prompts, aiming to find sub-prompts' synonyms that maintain the original intent while
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T17:43:29Z)
• Towards Verifiable Text Generation with Symbolic References [27.01624440701639]
  We propose symbolically grounded generation (SymGen) as a simple approach for enabling easier manual validation of an LLM's output. SymGen prompts an LLM to interleave its regular output text with explicit symbolic references to fields present in some conditioning data. Across a range of data-to-text and question-answering experiments, we find that LLMs are able to directly output text that makes use of accurate symbolic references while maintaining fluency and factuality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T18:28:29Z)
• A Robust Semantics-based Watermark for Large Language Model against Paraphrasing [50.84892876636013]
  Large language models (LLMs) have show great ability in various natural language tasks. There are concerns that LLMs are possible to be used improperly or even illegally. We propose a semantics-based watermark framework SemaMark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T06:19:02Z)
• SeqXGPT: Sentence-Level AI-Generated Text Detection [62.3792779440284]
  We introduce a sentence-level detection challenge by synthesizing documents polished with large language models (LLMs) We then propose textbfSequence textbfX (Check) textbfGPT, a novel method that utilizes log probability lists from white-box LLMs as features for sentence-level AIGT detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:18:53Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.