Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02903v1
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 03:46:52 GMT
- Title: Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction
- Authors: Shiguang Guo, Ziliang Deng, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun,
- Abstract summary: We propose a new planning task--open grounded planning.
The primary objective of open grounded planning is to ask the model to generate an executable plan based on a variable action set.
Then we test current state-of-the-art LLMs along with five planning approaches, revealing that existing LLMs and methods still struggle to address the challenges posed by grounded planning in open domains.
- Score: 44.86307213996181
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has increasingly drawn attention to the use of LLMs for human-like planning. Existing work on LLM-based planning either focuses on leveraging the inherent language generation capabilities of LLMs to produce free-style plans, or employs reinforcement learning approaches to learn decision-making for a limited set of actions within restricted environments. However, both approaches exhibit significant discrepancies from the open and executable requirements in real-world planning. In this paper, we propose a new planning task--open grounded planning. The primary objective of open grounded planning is to ask the model to generate an executable plan based on a variable action set, thereby ensuring the executability of the produced plan. To this end, we establishes a benchmark for open grounded planning spanning a wide range of domains. Then we test current state-of-the-art LLMs along with five planning approaches, revealing that existing LLMs and methods still struggle to address the challenges posed by grounded planning in open domains. The outcomes of this paper define and establish a foundational dataset for open grounded planning, and shed light on the potential challenges and future directions of LLM-based planning.
Related papers
- LASP: Surveying the State-of-the-Art in Large Language Model-Assisted AI Planning [7.36760703426119]
This survey aims to highlight the existing challenges in planning with language models.
It focuses on key areas such as embodied environments, optimal scheduling, competitive and cooperative games, task decomposition, reasoning, and planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T11:39:52Z) - Exploring and Benchmarking the Planning Capabilities of Large Language Models [57.23454975238014]
This work lays the foundations for improving planning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We construct a comprehensive benchmark suite encompassing both classical planning benchmarks and natural language scenarios.
We investigate the use of many-shot in-context learning to enhance LLM planning, exploring the relationship between increased context length and improved planning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T22:57:06Z) - On the Roles of LLMs in Planning: Embedding LLMs into Planning Graphs [12.326862964753694]
We study the insight of the planning capability of large language models (LLMs) in off-the-shelf planning frameworks.
We propose a novel LLMs-based planning framework with LLMs embedded in two levels of planning graphs.
We empirically exhibit the effectiveness of our proposed framework in various planning domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T15:53:32Z) - What's the Plan? Evaluating and Developing Planning-Aware Techniques for Language Models [7.216683826556268]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for applications that require planning capabilities.
We introduce SimPlan, a novel hybrid-method, and evaluate its performance in a new challenging setup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T07:42:49Z) - Understanding the planning of LLM agents: A survey [98.82513390811148]
This survey provides the first systematic view of LLM-based agents planning, covering recent works aiming to improve planning ability.
Comprehensive analyses are conducted for each direction, and further challenges in the field of research are discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T04:25:24Z) - LLM-Assist: Enhancing Closed-Loop Planning with Language-Based Reasoning [65.86754998249224]
We develop a novel hybrid planner that leverages a conventional rule-based planner in conjunction with an LLM-based planner.
Our approach navigates complex scenarios which existing planners struggle with, produces well-reasoned outputs while also remaining grounded through working alongside the rule-based approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-30T02:53:45Z) - Planning as In-Painting: A Diffusion-Based Embodied Task Planning
Framework for Environments under Uncertainty [56.30846158280031]
Task planning for embodied AI has been one of the most challenging problems.
We propose a task-agnostic method named 'planning as in-painting'
The proposed framework achieves promising performances in various embodied AI tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-02T10:07:17Z) - AdaPlanner: Adaptive Planning from Feedback with Language Models [56.367020818139665]
Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated the potential in acting as autonomous agents for sequential decision-making tasks.
We propose a closed-loop approach, AdaPlanner, which allows the LLM agent to refine its self-generated plan adaptively in response to environmental feedback.
To mitigate hallucination, we develop a code-style LLM prompt structure that facilitates plan generation across a variety of tasks, environments, and agent capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-26T05:52:27Z) - On the Planning Abilities of Large Language Models : A Critical
Investigation [34.262740442260515]
We evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in generating plans autonomously in commonsense planning tasks.
In the LLM-Modulo setting, we demonstrate that LLM-generated plans can improve the search process for underlying sound planners.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T06:32:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.