MUC: Machine Unlearning for Contrastive Learning with Black-box Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.03603v2
• Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 01:17:44 GMT
• Title: MUC: Machine Unlearning for Contrastive Learning with Black-box Evaluation
• Authors: Yihan Wang, Yiwei Lu, Guojun Zhang, Franziska Boenisch, Adam Dziedzic, Yaoliang Yu, Xiao-Shan Gao,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Machine Unlearning for Contrastive Learning (MUC) framework and adapting existing methods.<n>We identify limitations in current approaches, noting that several methods perform inadequately as unlearners and that existing evaluation tools validate unlearning effects in contrastive learning.<n>We demonstrate that AC achieves state-of-the-art performance, approximating exact unlearning (retraining), and enables data owners to clearly visualize unlearning effects through black-box evaluation.
• Score: 33.418062986773606
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine unlearning offers effective solutions for revoking the influence of specific training data on pre-trained model parameters. While existing approaches address unlearning for classification and generative models, they overlook an important category of machine learning models: contrastive learning (CL) methods. This paper addresses this gap by introducing the Machine Unlearning for Contrastive Learning (MUC) framework and adapting existing methods. We identify limitations in current approaches, noting that several methods perform inadequately as unlearners and that existing evaluation tools insufficiently validate unlearning effects in contrastive learning. To address these issues, we propose Alignment Calibration (AC), a novel method that explicitly considers contrastive learning properties and optimizes towards new auditing metrics for easy verification of unlearning. Through empirical comparisons with baseline methods on SimCLR, MoCo, and CLIP, we demonstrate that AC: (1) achieves state-of-the-art performance, approximating exact unlearning (retraining); (2) enables data owners to clearly visualize unlearning effects through black-box evaluation. The code is available at https://github.com/EhanW/Alignment-Calibration.

Related papers

• Unlearning Comparator: A Visual Analytics System for Comparative Evaluation of Machine Unlearning Methods [23.6050988823262]
  Machine Unlearning (MU) aims to remove target training data from a trained model so that the removed data no longer influences the model's behavior.<n>Yet, researchers in this rapidly emerging field face challenges in analyzing and understanding the behavior of different MU methods.<n>We introduce a visual analytics system, Unlearning Comparator, designed to facilitate the systematic evaluation of MU methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-18T08:53:53Z)
• WSS-CL: Weight Saliency Soft-Guided Contrastive Learning for Efficient Machine Unlearning Image Classification [0.0]
  We introduce a new two-phase efficient machine unlearning method for image classification, in terms of weight saliency.<n>Our method is called weight saliency soft-guided contrastive learning for efficient machine unlearning image classification (WSS-CL)<n>Our proposed method yields much-improved unlearning efficacy with negligible performance loss compared to state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T10:47:36Z)
• Efficient Machine Unlearning via Influence Approximation [75.31015485113993]
  Influence-based unlearning has emerged as a prominent approach to estimate the impact of individual training samples on model parameters without retraining.<n>This paper establishes a theoretical link between memorizing (incremental learning) and forgetting (unlearning)<n>We introduce the Influence Approximation Unlearning algorithm for efficient machine unlearning from the incremental perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T05:34:27Z)
• Towards Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management: Measuring Sample-level Unlearning Completeness [30.596695293390415]
  Interpolated Approximate Measurement (IAM) is a framework designed for unlearning inference.<n>IAM quantifies sample-level unlearning completeness by interpolating the model's generalization-fitting behavior gap on queried samples.<n>We apply IAM to recent approximate unlearning algorithms, revealing general risks of both over-unlearning and under-unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T14:22:18Z)
• UniErase: Towards Balanced and Precise Unlearning in Language Models [69.04923022755547]
  Large language models (LLMs) require iterative updates to address the outdated information problem.<n>UniErase is a novel unlearning framework that demonstrates precision and balanced performances between knowledge unlearning and ability retaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T15:53:28Z)
• MUBox: A Critical Evaluation Framework of Deep Machine Unlearning [13.186439491394474]
  MUBox is a comprehensive platform designed to evaluate unlearning methods in deep learning.<n> MUBox integrates 23 advanced unlearning techniques, tested across six practical scenarios with 11 diverse evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T13:50:51Z)
• Instance-Level Data-Use Auditing of Visual ML Models [47.369572284751285]
  Growing trend of legal disputes over the unauthorized use of data in machine learning (ML) systems highlights the need for reliable data-use auditing mechanisms. We present the first proactive instance-level data-use auditing method designed to enable data owners to audit the use of their individual data instances in ML models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T13:28:57Z)
• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Adversarial Machine Unlearning [26.809123658470693]
  This paper focuses on the challenge of machine unlearning, aiming to remove the influence of specific training data on machine learning models. Traditionally, the development of unlearning algorithms runs parallel with that of membership inference attacks (MIA), a type of privacy threat. We propose a game-theoretic framework that integrates MIAs into the design of unlearning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T20:07:22Z)
• Adaptive Rentention & Correction for Continual Learning [114.5656325514408]
  A common problem in continual learning is the classification layer's bias towards the most recent task. We name our approach Adaptive Retention & Correction (ARC) ARC achieves an average performance increase of 2.7% and 2.6% on the CIFAR-100 and Imagenet-R datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T08:43:09Z)
• Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning [33.18951938708467]
  In response to recent data regulation requirements, machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical process. Our study introduces a novel model-based perspective: model sparsification via weight pruning. We show in both theory and practice that model sparsity can boost the multi-criteria unlearning performance of an approximate unlearner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T02:12:02Z)
• Implicit Offline Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Learning [83.8241505499762]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) via Supervised Learning is a simple and effective way to learn robotic skills from a dataset collected by policies of different expertise levels. We show how implicit models can leverage return information and match or outperform explicit algorithms to acquire robotic skills from fixed datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T21:59:42Z)
• Continual Learning For On-Device Environmental Sound Classification [63.81276321857279]
  We propose a simple and efficient continual learning method for on-device environmental sound classification. Our method selects the historical data for the training by measuring the per-sample classification uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-15T12:13:04Z)
• MACE: An Efficient Model-Agnostic Framework for Counterfactual Explanation [132.77005365032468]
  We propose a novel framework of Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanation (MACE) In our MACE approach, we propose a novel RL-based method for finding good counterfactual examples and a gradient-less descent method for improving proximity. Experiments on public datasets validate the effectiveness with better validity, sparsity and proximity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T04:57:06Z)
• On the Necessity of Auditable Algorithmic Definitions for Machine Unlearning [13.149070833843133]
  Machine unlearning, i.e. having a model forget about some of its training data, has become increasingly important as privacy legislation promotes variants of the right-to-be-forgotten. We first show that the definition that underlies approximate unlearning, which seeks to prove the approximately unlearned model is close to an exactly retrained model, is incorrect because one can obtain the same model using different datasets. We then turn to exact unlearning approaches and ask how to verify their claims of unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T16:16:56Z)
• Machine Unlearning of Features and Labels [72.81914952849334]
  We propose first scenarios for unlearning and labels in machine learning models. Our approach builds on the concept of influence functions and realizes unlearning through closed-form updates of model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T04:42:24Z)
• Certifiable Machine Unlearning for Linear Models [1.484852576248587]
  Machine unlearning is the task of updating machine learning (ML) models after a subset of the training data they were trained on is deleted. We present an experimental study of the three state-of-the-art approximate unlearning methods for linear models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T05:05:58Z)
• Few-shot Action Recognition with Prototype-centered Attentive Learning [88.10852114988829]
  Prototype-centered Attentive Learning (PAL) model composed of two novel components. First, a prototype-centered contrastive learning loss is introduced to complement the conventional query-centered learning objective. Second, PAL integrates a attentive hybrid learning mechanism that can minimize the negative impacts of outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-20T11:48:12Z)
• Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
  We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model. Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses. BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.