What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04216v3
• Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:08:02 GMT
• Title: What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis
• Authors: Jiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL) One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration.
• Score: 89.65045443150889
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an intriguing ability to learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL). Understandably, a swath of research has been dedicated to uncovering the theories underpinning ICL. One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. LLMs identify the task based on the demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration. Finally, a third hypothesis argues that LLMs use the demonstration to select a composition of tasks learned during pre-training to perform ICL. In this paper, we empirically explore these three hypotheses that explain LLMs' ability to learn in context with a suite of experiments derived from common text classification tasks. We invalidate the first two hypotheses with counterexamples and provide evidence in support of the last hypothesis. Our results suggest an LLM could learn a novel task in context via composing tasks learned during pre-training.

Related papers

• Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models [52.891205009620364]
  In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties. The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:46:24Z)
• AlignedCoT: Prompting Large Language Models via Native-Speaking Demonstrations [52.43593893122206]
  Alignedcot is an in-context learning technique for invoking Large Language Models. It achieves consistent and correct step-wise prompts in zero-shot scenarios. We conduct experiments on mathematical reasoning and commonsense reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T17:24:21Z)
• Large Language Models can Learn Rules [106.40747309894236]
  We present Hypotheses-to-Theories (HtT), a framework that learns a rule library for reasoning with large language models (LLMs) Experiments on relational reasoning, numerical reasoning and concept learning problems show that HtT improves existing prompting methods. The learned rules are also transferable to different models and to different forms of the same problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T23:07:01Z)
• In-Context Explainers: Harnessing LLMs for Explaining Black Box Models [28.396104334980492]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in complex tasks like machine translation, commonsense reasoning, and language understanding. One of the primary reasons for the adaptability of LLMs in such diverse tasks is their in-context learning (ICL) capability, which allows them to perform well on new tasks by simply using a few task samples in the prompt. We propose a novel framework, In-Context Explainers, comprising of three novel approaches that exploit the ICL capabilities of LLMs to explain the predictions made by other predictive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T15:31:03Z)
• Ambiguity-Aware In-Context Learning with Large Language Models [27.20414960164616]
  In-context learning (ICL) i.e. showing LLMs task-specific demonstrations has led to downstream gains with no task-specific fine-tuning required. This study investigates how to select good demonstrations for ICL. We find that it is beneficial to not only choose semantically similar ICL demonstrations but also to choose those that help resolve the inherent label ambiguity surrounding the test example.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:48:34Z)
• Explaining Emergent In-Context Learning as Kernel Regression [61.57151500616111]
  Large language models (LLMs) have initiated a paradigm shift in transfer learning. In this paper, we investigate the reason why a transformer-based language model can accomplish in-context learning after pre-training. We find that during ICL, the attention and hidden features in LLMs match the behaviors of a kernel regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T06:45:02Z)
• What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning [24.395288160951118]
  Large language models (LLMs) exploit in-context learning (ICL) to solve tasks with only a few demonstrations. We characterize two ways through which ICL leverages demonstrations. We show that models can achieve non-trivial performance with only TR, and TR does not further improve with larger models or more demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T18:05:19Z)
• ICL-D3IE: In-Context Learning with Diverse Demonstrations Updating for Document Information Extraction [56.790794611002106]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable results in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks with in-context learning. We propose a simple but effective in-context learning framework called ICL-D3IE. Specifically, we extract the most difficult and distinct segments from hard training documents as hard demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T06:24:50Z)
• Beyond Distributional Hypothesis: Let Language Models Learn Meaning-Text Correspondence [45.9949173746044]
  We show that large-size pre-trained language models (PLMs) do not satisfy the logical negation property (LNP) We propose a novel intermediate training task, names meaning-matching, designed to directly learn a meaning-text correspondence. We find that the task enables PLMs to learn lexical semantic information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-08T08:37:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.