CRAG -- Comprehensive RAG Benchmark

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04744v2
• Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:30:17 GMT
• Title: CRAG -- Comprehensive RAG Benchmark
• Authors: Xiao Yang, Kai Sun, Hao Xin, Yushi Sun, Nikita Bhalla, Xiangsen Chen, Sajal Choudhary, Rongze Daniel Gui, Ziran Will Jiang, Ziyu Jiang, Lingkun Kong, Brian Moran, Jiaqi Wang, Yifan Ethan Xu, An Yan, Chenyu Yang, Eting Yuan, Hanwen Zha, Nan Tang, Lei Chen, Nicolas Scheffer, Yue Liu, Nirav Shah, Rakesh Wanga, Anuj Kumar, Wen-tau Yih, Xin Luna Dong,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a promising solution to alleviate Large Language Model (LLM)'s deficiency in lack of knowledge. Existing RAG datasets do not adequately represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world Question Answering (QA) tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Comprehensive RAG Benchmark (CRAG) CRAG is a factual question answering benchmark of 4,409 question-answer pairs and mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph (KG) search.
• Score: 58.15980697921195
• License:
• Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a promising solution to alleviate Large Language Model (LLM)'s deficiency in lack of knowledge. Existing RAG datasets, however, do not adequately represent the diverse and dynamic nature of real-world Question Answering (QA) tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Comprehensive RAG Benchmark (CRAG), a factual question answering benchmark of 4,409 question-answer pairs and mock APIs to simulate web and Knowledge Graph (KG) search. CRAG is designed to encapsulate a diverse array of questions across five domains and eight question categories, reflecting varied entity popularity from popular to long-tail, and temporal dynamisms ranging from years to seconds. Our evaluation of this benchmark highlights the gap to fully trustworthy QA. Whereas most advanced LLMs achieve <=34% accuracy on CRAG, adding RAG in a straightforward manner improves the accuracy only to 44%. State-of-the-art industry RAG solutions only answer 63% of questions without any hallucination. CRAG also reveals much lower accuracy in answering questions regarding facts with higher dynamism, lower popularity, or higher complexity, suggesting future research directions. The CRAG benchmark laid the groundwork for a KDD Cup 2024 challenge and attracted thousands of participants and submissions. We commit to maintaining CRAG to serve research communities in advancing RAG solutions and general QA solutions. CRAG is available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/CRAG/.

Related papers

• Do RAG Systems Cover What Matters? Evaluating and Optimizing Responses with Sub-Question Coverage [74.70255719194819]
  We introduce a novel framework based on sub-question coverage, which measures how well a RAG system addresses different facets of a question. We use this framework to evaluate three commercial generative answer engines: You.com, Perplexity AI, and Bing Chat. We find that while all answer engines cover core sub-questions more often than background or follow-up ones, they still miss around 50% of core sub-questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T22:59:34Z)
• RAG-ConfusionQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Confusing Questions [52.33835101586687]
  Conversational AI agents use Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to provide verifiable document-grounded responses to user inquiries. This paper presents a novel synthetic data generation method to efficiently create a diverse set of context-grounded confusing questions from a given document corpus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:11:29Z)
• AT-RAG: An Adaptive RAG Model Enhancing Query Efficiency with Topic Filtering and Iterative Reasoning [0.0]
  We propose AT-RAG, a novel multistep RAG incorporating topic modeling for efficient document retrieval and reasoning. Using BERTopic, our model dynamically assigns topics to queries, improving retrieval accuracy and efficiency. Results show significant improvements in correctness, completeness, and relevance compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T01:57:56Z)
• Revisiting the Solution of Meta KDD Cup 2024: CRAG [45.217913880930155]
  This paper presents the solution of our team APEX in the Meta KDD CUP 2024: CRAG Comprehensive RAG Benchmark Challenge. The CRAG benchmark addresses the limitations of existing QA benchmarks in evaluating the diverse and dynamic challenges faced by Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. We propose a routing-based domain and dynamic adaptive RAG pipeline, which performs specific processing for the diverse and dynamic nature of the question.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T07:28:14Z)
• A Knowledge-Centric Benchmarking Framework and Empirical Study for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [4.359511178431438]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances generative models by integrating retrieval mechanisms. Despite its advantages, RAG encounters significant challenges, particularly in effectively handling real-world queries. This paper proposes a novel RAG benchmark designed to address these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-03T03:31:37Z)
• RAGChecker: A Fine-grained Framework for Diagnosing Retrieval-Augmented Generation [61.14660526363607]
  We propose a fine-grained evaluation framework, RAGChecker, that incorporates a suite of diagnostic metrics for both the retrieval and generation modules. RAGChecker has significantly better correlations with human judgments than other evaluation metrics. The metrics of RAGChecker can guide researchers and practitioners in developing more effective RAG systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T10:20:54Z)
• RAG-QA Arena: Evaluating Domain Robustness for Long-form Retrieval Augmented Question Answering [61.19126689470398]
  Long-form RobustQA (LFRQA) is a new dataset covering 26K queries and large corpora across seven different domains. We show via experiments that RAG-QA Arena and human judgments on answer quality are highly correlated. Only 41.3% of the most competitive LLM's answers are preferred to LFRQA's answers, demonstrating RAG-QA Arena as a challenging evaluation platform for future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T03:02:51Z)
• Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey [38.50754568320154]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a paradigm to address such challenges. RAG introduces the information retrieval process, which enhances the generation process by retrieving relevant objects from available data stores. In this paper, we comprehensively review existing efforts that integrate RAG technique into AIGC scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T18:59:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.