A Manifold Perspective on the Statistical Generalization of Graph Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05225v3
• Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 16:16:13 GMT
• Title: A Manifold Perspective on the Statistical Generalization of Graph Neural Networks
• Authors: Zhiyang Wang, Juan Cervino, Alejandro Ribeiro,
• Abstract summary: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) combine information from adjacent nodes by successive applications of graph convolutions. We study the generalization gaps of GNNs on both node-level and graph-level tasks. We show that the generalization gaps decrease with the number of nodes in the training graphs.
• Score: 84.01980526069075
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Convolutional neural networks have been successfully extended to operate on graphs, giving rise to Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). GNNs combine information from adjacent nodes by successive applications of graph convolutions. GNNs have been implemented successfully in various learning tasks while the theoretical understanding of their generalization capability is still in progress. In this paper, we leverage manifold theory to analyze the statistical generalization gap of GNNs operating on graphs constructed on sampled points from manifolds. We study the generalization gaps of GNNs on both node-level and graph-level tasks. We show that the generalization gaps decrease with the number of nodes in the training graphs, which guarantees the generalization of GNNs to unseen points over manifolds. We validate our theoretical results in multiple real-world datasets.

Related papers

• Graph neural networks and non-commuting operators [4.912318087940015]
  We develop a limit theory of graphon-tuple neural networks and use it to prove a universal transferability theorem. Our theoretical results extend well-known transferability theorems for GNNs to the case of several simultaneous graphs. We derive a training procedure that provably enforces the stability of the resulting model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T21:17:14Z)
• Generalization of Geometric Graph Neural Networks [84.01980526069075]
  We study the generalization capabilities of geometric graph neural networks (GNNs) We prove a generalization gap between the optimal empirical risk and the optimal statistical risk of this GNN. The most important observation is that the generalization capability can be realized with one large graph instead of being limited to the size of the graph as in previous results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-08T18:55:57Z)
• Towards Better Generalization with Flexible Representation of Multi-Module Graph Neural Networks [0.27195102129094995]
  We use a random graph generator to investigate how the graph size and structural properties affect the predictive performance of GNNs. We present specific evidence that the average node degree is a key feature in determining whether GNNs can generalize to unseen graphs. We propose a multi- module GNN framework that allows the network to adapt flexibly to new graphs by generalizing a single canonical nonlinear transformation over aggregated inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-14T12:13:59Z)
• MentorGNN: Deriving Curriculum for Pre-Training GNNs [61.97574489259085]
  We propose an end-to-end model named MentorGNN that aims to supervise the pre-training process of GNNs across graphs. We shed new light on the problem of domain adaption on relational data (i.e., graphs) by deriving a natural and interpretable upper bound on the generalization error of the pre-trained GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-21T15:12:08Z)
• Distribution Preserving Graph Representation Learning [11.340722297341788]
  Graph neural network (GNN) is effective to model graphs for distributed representations of nodes and an entire graph. We propose Distribution Preserving GNN (DP-GNN) - a GNN framework that can improve the generalizability of expressive GNN models. We evaluate the proposed DP-GNN framework on multiple benchmark datasets for graph classification tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T19:16:26Z)
• Graph Neural Networks for Graphs with Heterophily: A Survey [98.45621222357397]
  We provide a comprehensive review of graph neural networks (GNNs) for heterophilic graphs. Specifically, we propose a systematic taxonomy that essentially governs existing heterophilic GNN models. We discuss the correlation between graph heterophily and various graph research domains, aiming to facilitate the development of more effective GNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T23:07:47Z)
• A Unified View on Graph Neural Networks as Graph Signal Denoising [49.980783124401555]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have risen to prominence in learning representations for graph structured data. In this work, we establish mathematically that the aggregation processes in a group of representative GNN models can be regarded as solving a graph denoising problem. We instantiate a novel GNN model, ADA-UGNN, derived from UGNN, to handle graphs with adaptive smoothness across nodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-05T04:57:18Z)
• Expressive Power of Invariant and Equivariant Graph Neural Networks [10.419350129060598]
  We show that Folklore Graph Neural Networks (FGNN) are the most expressive architectures proposed so far for a given tensor order. FGNNs are able to learn how to solve the problem, leading to much better average performances than existing algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T16:35:45Z)
• XGNN: Towards Model-Level Explanations of Graph Neural Networks [113.51160387804484]
  Graphs neural networks (GNNs) learn node features by aggregating and combining neighbor information. GNNs are mostly treated as black-boxes and lack human intelligible explanations. We propose a novel approach, known as XGNN, to interpret GNNs at the model-level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T23:52:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.