The elision of the subject and the manifestation of the world

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.06659v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:26:12 GMT
• Title: The elision of the subject and the manifestation of the world
• Authors: Ulrich Mohrhoff,
• Abstract summary: It follows that neither quantum objects nor measuring instruments can be regarded as property-carriers independent of conscious subjects. If the difference between the classical domain and the quantum domain is understood as essentially the difference between the manifested world and what is instrumental in its manifestation, the elision of the subject can again be achieved.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Owing to the contextuality of the properties of quantum objects, quantum mechanics does not appear to countenance the elision of the thinking and perceiving subject. If quantum objects owe their properties to the experimental conditions in which they are observed, the experimental apparatus cannot owe its properties to the quantum objects of which it is commonly said to be composed. It follows that neither quantum objects nor measuring instruments can be regarded as property-carriers existing independently of conscious subjects. However, if the difference between the classical domain and the quantum domain is understood as essentially the difference between the manifested world and what is instrumental in its manifestation, the elision of the subject can again be achieved.

Related papers

• Counterfactuals in Macroscopic Quantum Physics: Irreversibility, Measurement and Locality [0.0]
  We argue that measurement, irreversibility and locality can all appear to challenge the universality of quantum theory.<n>We find novel features of quantum thermodynamics relating to irreversibility, information erasure and coherence.<n>This reveals new ways of characterising the quantum information stored in entanglement and quantum branching structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T20:14:17Z)
• Observation of Quantum Darwinism and the Origin of Classicality with Superconducting Circuits [9.09683951826704]
  How can we rationalize everyday classical observations from an inherently quantum world? Quantum Darwinism offers a compelling framework to explain this emergence of classicality. We observe the highly structured branching quantum states that support classicality and the saturation of quantum mutual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:33:32Z)
• Embezzling entanglement from quantum fields [41.94295877935867]
  Embezzlement of entanglement refers to the counterintuitive possibility of extracting entangled quantum states from a reference state of an auxiliary system. We uncover a deep connection between the operational task of embezzling entanglement and the mathematical classification of von Neumann algebras.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-14T13:58:32Z)
• Witnessing the non-objectivity of an unknown quantum dynamics [0.6745502291821955]
  We show that objectivity implies a Bell-like inequality. Observers probing distinct parts of the environment can agree upon their measurement outcome of a given observable. But such outcome can be totally uncorrelated from the property of the quantum system that fixed observable should be probing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-28T18:44:42Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Experimental study of quantum uncertainty from lack of information [3.901856932788151]
  The uncertainty in the classical domain comes from the lack of information about the exact state of the system. In this paper we investigate the issue experimentally by implementing the corresponding two-dimensional and three-dimensional guessing games. Our results confirm that within the guessing-game framework, the quantum uncertainty to a large extent relies on the fact that quantum information determining the key properties of the game is stored in the degrees of freedom that remain inaccessible to the guessing party.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-19T09:15:27Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Localizable quantum coherence [0.0]
  Coherence is a fundamental notion in quantum mechanics, defined relative to a reference basis. We put forward a notion of localizable coherence as the coherence that can be stored in a particular subsystem. We show that it can be applied to reveal the real-space structure of states of interest in quantum many-body theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T17:44:05Z)
• The Dilemma of Quantum Individuality Beyond Particle Metaphysics [0.0]
  It is commonly claimed that quantum mechanics makes reference to a microscopic realm constituted by elementary particles. It is not at all clear what these quantum particles really are.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T20:25:04Z)
• Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
  Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality. This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment. It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.