Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.07353v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:22:48 GMT
• Title: Toxic Memes: A Survey of Computational Perspectives on the Detection and Explanation of Meme Toxicities
• Abstract summary: Studies on the computational analyses of toxic memes have significantly grown over the past five years. The only three surveys on computational toxic meme analysis cover only work published until 2022. Our work fills this gap by surveying content-based computational perspectives on toxic memes.
• Score: 0.26624014064407714
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Internet memes, channels for humor, social commentary, and cultural expression, are increasingly used to spread toxic messages. Studies on the computational analyses of toxic memes have significantly grown over the past five years, and the only three surveys on computational toxic meme analysis cover only work published until 2022, leading to inconsistent terminology and unexplored trends. Our work fills this gap by surveying content-based computational perspectives on toxic memes, and reviewing key developments until early 2024. Employing the PRISMA methodology, we systematically extend the previously considered papers, achieving a threefold result. First, we survey 119 new papers, analyzing 158 computational works focused on content-based toxic meme analysis. We identify over 30 datasets used in toxic meme analysis and examine their labeling systems. Second, after observing the existence of unclear definitions of meme toxicity in computational works, we introduce a new taxonomy for categorizing meme toxicity types. We also note an expansion in computational tasks beyond the simple binary classification of memes as toxic or non-toxic, indicating a shift towards achieving a nuanced comprehension of toxicity. Third, we identify three content-based dimensions of meme toxicity under automatic study: target, intent, and conveyance tactics. We develop a framework illustrating the relationships between these dimensions and meme toxicities. The survey analyzes key challenges and recent trends, such as enhanced cross-modal reasoning, integrating expert and cultural knowledge, the demand for automatic toxicity explanations, and handling meme toxicity in low-resource languages. Also, it notes the rising use of Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI for detecting and generating toxic memes. Finally, it proposes pathways for advancing toxic meme detection and interpretation.

Related papers

• M-QUEST -- Meme Question-Understanding Evaluation on Semantics and Toxicity [10.944605467795848]
  We present a semantic framework and a corresponding benchmark for automatic knowledge extraction from memes.<n>The framework guides a semi-automatic process of generating a benchmark with commonsense question-answer pairs about meme toxicity assessment.<n>The resulting benchmark M-QUEST consists of 609 question-answer pairs for 307 memes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T16:56:39Z)
• Unveiling Covert Toxicity in Multimodal Data via Toxicity Association Graphs: A Graph-Based Metric and Interpretable Detection Framework [58.01529356381494]
  We propose a novel detection framework based on Toxicity Association Graphs (TAGs)<n>We introduce the first quantifiable metric for hidden toxicity, the Multimodal Toxicity Covertness (MTC)<n>Our approach enables precise identification of covert toxicity while preserving full interpretability of the decision-making process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T08:54:25Z)
• Toxicity in Online Platforms and AI Systems: A Survey of Needs, Challenges, Mitigations, and Future Directions [12.73085307172367]
  The evolution of digital communication systems and the designs of online platforms have inadvertently facilitated the subconscious propagation of toxic behavior.<n>This survey attempts to generate a comprehensive taxonomy of toxicity from various perspectives.<n>It presents a holistic approach to explain the toxicity by understanding the context and environment that society is facing in the Artificial Intelligence era.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T21:55:23Z)
• Defining, Understanding, and Detecting Online Toxicity: Challenges and Machine Learning Approaches [4.1824815480811806]
  This study represents the synthesis of 140 publications on different types of toxic content on digital platforms.<n>The dataset encompasses content in 32 languages, covering topics such as elections, spontaneous events, and crises.<n>We present the recommendations and guidelines for new research on online toxic consent and the use of content moderation for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T00:16:53Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Toxicity in Image-Text Pretraining Datasets: A Case Study on LLaVA [0.0]
  This dataset removes 7,531 of toxic image-text pairs in the LLaVA pre-training dataset.<n>We offer guidelines for implementing robust toxicity detection pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T18:01:50Z)
• Aligned Probing: Relating Toxic Behavior and Model Internals [66.49887503194101]
  We introduce aligned probing, a novel interpretability framework that aligns the behavior of language models (LMs) Using this framework, we examine over 20 OLMo, Llama, and Mistral models, bridging behavioral and internal perspectives for toxicity for the first time. Our results show that LMs strongly encode information about the toxicity level of inputs and subsequent outputs, particularly in lower layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T17:23:50Z)
• Enhancing LLM-based Hatred and Toxicity Detection with Meta-Toxic Knowledge Graph [36.07351851458233]
  The absence of domain-specific toxic knowledge leads to false negatives. The excessive sensitivity of Large Language Models to toxic speech results in false positives. We propose a novel method called MetaTox, leveraging graph search on a meta-toxic knowledge graph to enhance hatred and toxicity detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T06:28:28Z)
• Just KIDDIN: Knowledge Infusion and Distillation for Detection of INdecent Memes [8.337745035712311]
  We propose a novel framework that integrates Knowledge Distillation (KD) from Large Visual Language Models (LVLMs) and knowledge infusion to enhance the performance of toxicity detection in hateful memes. Our approach extracts sub-knowledge graphs from ConceptNet, a large-scale commonsense Knowledge Graph (KG) to be infused within a compact VLM framework. Experimental results from our study on two hate speech benchmark datasets demonstrate superior performance over the state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T02:39:28Z)
• MemeMQA: Multimodal Question Answering for Memes via Rationale-Based Inferencing [53.30190591805432]
  We introduce MemeMQA, a multimodal question-answering framework to solicit accurate responses to structured questions. We also propose ARSENAL, a novel two-stage multimodal framework to address MemeMQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-18T07:44:41Z)
• Facilitating Fine-grained Detection of Chinese Toxic Language: Hierarchical Taxonomy, Resources, and Benchmarks [18.44630180661091]
  Existing datasets lack fine-grained annotation of toxic types and expressions. It is crucial to introduce lexical knowledge to detect the toxicity of posts. In this paper, we facilitate the fine-grained detection of Chinese toxic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T03:50:38Z)
• Detoxifying Text with MaRCo: Controllable Revision with Experts and Anti-Experts [57.38912708076231]
  We introduce MaRCo, a detoxification algorithm that combines controllable generation and text rewriting methods. MaRCo uses likelihoods under a non-toxic LM and a toxic LM to find candidate words to mask and potentially replace. We evaluate our method on several subtle toxicity and microaggressions datasets, and show that it not only outperforms baselines on automatic metrics, but MaRCo's rewrites are preferred 2.1 $times$ more in human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:50:00Z)
• Toxicity Detection with Generative Prompt-based Inference [3.9741109244650823]
  It is a long-known risk that language models (LMs), once trained on corpus containing undesirable content, have the power to manifest biases and toxicity. In this work, we explore the generative variant of zero-shot prompt-based toxicity detection with comprehensive trials on prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T22:44:43Z)
• Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Survey [48.135415967633676]
  We offer a comprehensive survey with a focus on harmful memes. One interesting finding is that many types of harmful memes are not really studied, e.g., such featuring self-harm and extremism. Another observation is that memes can propagate globally through repackaging in different languages and that they can also be multilingual.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T13:43:27Z)
• Toxicity Detection can be Sensitive to the Conversational Context [64.28043776806213]
  We construct and publicly release a dataset of 10,000 posts with two kinds of toxicity labels. We introduce a new task, context sensitivity estimation, which aims to identify posts whose perceived toxicity changes if the context is also considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T13:57:26Z)
• Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection [75.54119209776894]
  We investigate the effect of annotator identities (who) and beliefs (why) on toxic language annotations. We consider posts with three characteristics: anti-Black language, African American English dialect, and vulgarity. Our results show strong associations between annotator identity and beliefs and their ratings of toxicity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-15T18:58:20Z)
• A feast for trolls -- Engagement analysis of counternarratives against online toxicity [0.0]
  Between February 2020 and July 2021, we observed over 15 million toxic messages on social media. Over 1,000 dashboard users responded to toxic messages with combinations of visual memes, text, or AI-generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-13T20:38:31Z)
• RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models [93.151822563361]
  Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist, sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate toxic language, and the effectiveness of controllable text generation algorithms at preventing such toxic degeneration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T03:17:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.