Unveiling Covert Toxicity in Multimodal Data via Toxicity Association Graphs: A Graph-Based Metric and Interpretable Detection Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.03268v1
• Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 08:54:25 GMT
• Title: Unveiling Covert Toxicity in Multimodal Data via Toxicity Association Graphs: A Graph-Based Metric and Interpretable Detection Framework
• Authors: Guanzong Wu, Zihao Zhu, Siwei Lyu, Baoyuan Wu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel detection framework based on Toxicity Association Graphs (TAGs)<n>We introduce the first quantifiable metric for hidden toxicity, the Multimodal Toxicity Covertness (MTC)<n>Our approach enables precise identification of covert toxicity while preserving full interpretability of the decision-making process.
• Score: 58.01529356381494
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Detecting toxicity in multimodal data remains a significant challenge, as harmful meanings often lurk beneath seemingly benign individual modalities: only emerging when modalities are combined and semantic associations are activated. To address this, we propose a novel detection framework based on Toxicity Association Graphs (TAGs), which systematically model semantic associations between innocuous entities and latent toxic implications. Leveraging TAGs, we introduce the first quantifiable metric for hidden toxicity, the Multimodal Toxicity Covertness (MTC), which measures the degree of concealment in toxic multimodal expressions. By integrating our detection framework with the MTC metric, our approach enables precise identification of covert toxicity while preserving full interpretability of the decision-making process, significantly enhancing transparency in multimodal toxicity detection. To validate our method, we construct the Covert Toxic Dataset, the first benchmark specifically designed to capture high-covertness toxic multimodal instances. This dataset encodes nuanced cross-modal associations and serves as a rigorous testbed for evaluating both the proposed metric and detection framework. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing methods across both low- and high-covertness toxicity regimes, while delivering clear, interpretable, and auditable detection outcomes. Together, our contributions advance the state of the art in explainable multimodal toxicity detection and lay the foundation for future context-aware and interpretable approaches. Content Warning: This paper contains examples of toxic multimodal content that may be offensive or disturbing to some readers. Reader discretion is advised.

Related papers

• Do Prompts Guarantee Safety? Mitigating Toxicity from LLM Generations through Subspace Intervention [6.808534332444413]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful text generators.<n>LLMs can produce toxic or harmful content even when given seemingly harmless prompts.<n>This presents a serious safety challenge and can cause real-world harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T11:33:17Z)
• Rethinking Toxicity Evaluation in Large Language Models: A Multi-Label Perspective [104.09817371557476]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results across a range of natural language processing tasks.<n>Their potential to generate harmful content has raised serious safety concerns.<n>We introduce three novel multi-label benchmarks for toxicity detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T06:50:33Z)
• MDIT-Bench: Evaluating the Dual-Implicit Toxicity in Large Multimodal Models [16.3469883819979]
  We introduce a subtler type of toxicity named dual-implicit toxicity and a novel toxicity benchmark termed MDIT-Bench: Multimodal Dual-Implicit Toxicity Benchmark.<n>MDIT-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating the sensitivity of models to dual-implicit toxicity, with 317,638 questions covering 12 categories, 23 subcategories, and 780 topics.<n>In the experiment, we conducted MDIT-Bench on 13 prominent LMMs, and the results show that these LMMs cannot handle dual-implicit toxicity effectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T07:30:01Z)
• ShieldVLM: Safeguarding the Multimodal Implicit Toxicity via Deliberative Reasoning with LVLMs [72.8646625127485]
  Multimodal implicit toxicity appears not only as formal statements in social platforms but also prompts that can lead to toxic dialogs.<n>Despite the success in unimodal text or image moderation, toxicity detection for multimodal content, particularly the multimodal implicit toxicity, remains underexplored.<n>To advance the detection of multimodal implicit toxicity, we build ShieldVLM, a model which identifies implicit toxicity in multimodal statements, prompts and dialogs via deliberative cross-modal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T07:31:17Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Toxicity in Image-Text Pretraining Datasets: A Case Study on LLaVA [0.0]
  This dataset removes 7,531 of toxic image-text pairs in the LLaVA pre-training dataset.<n>We offer guidelines for implementing robust toxicity detection pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T18:01:50Z)
• Aligned Probing: Relating Toxic Behavior and Model Internals [78.20380492883022]
  We introduce aligned probing, a novel interpretability framework that aligns the behavior of language models (LMs)<n>Using this framework, we examine over 20 OLMo, Llama, and Mistral models, bridging behavioral and internal perspectives for toxicity for the first time.<n>Our results show that LMs strongly encode information about the toxicity level of inputs and subsequent outputs, particularly in lower layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T17:23:50Z)
• Detoxifying Large Language Models via Knowledge Editing [57.0669577257301]
  This paper investigates using knowledge editing techniques to detoxify Large Language Models (LLMs) We construct a benchmark, SafeEdit, which covers nine unsafe categories with various powerful attack prompts. We conduct experiments with several knowledge editing approaches, indicating that knowledge editing has the potential to detoxify LLMs with a limited impact on general performance efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T15:18:30Z)
• Toxicity Detection with Generative Prompt-based Inference [3.9741109244650823]
  It is a long-known risk that language models (LMs), once trained on corpus containing undesirable content, have the power to manifest biases and toxicity. In this work, we explore the generative variant of zero-shot prompt-based toxicity detection with comprehensive trials on prompt engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T22:44:43Z)
• Toxicity Detection can be Sensitive to the Conversational Context [64.28043776806213]
  We construct and publicly release a dataset of 10,000 posts with two kinds of toxicity labels. We introduce a new task, context sensitivity estimation, which aims to identify posts whose perceived toxicity changes if the context is also considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T13:57:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.