Robustness of Structured Data Extraction from In-plane Rotated Documents using Multi-Modal Large Language Models (LLM)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10295v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:55:01 GMT
• Title: Robustness of Structured Data Extraction from In-plane Rotated Documents using Multi-Modal Large Language Models (LLM)
• Authors: Anjanava Biswas, Wrick Talukdar,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the impact of document skew on the data extraction accuracy of three state-of-the-art multi-modal models. We identify the safe in-plane rotation angles (SIPRA) for each model and investigate the effects of skew on model hallucinations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-modal large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks, including data extraction from documents. However, the accuracy of these models can be significantly affected by document in-plane rotation, also known as skew, a common issue in real-world scenarios for scanned documents. This study investigates the impact of document skew on the data extraction accuracy of three state-of-the-art multi-modal LLMs: Anthropic Claude V3 Sonnet, GPT-4-Turbo, and Llava:v1.6. We focus on extracting specific entities from synthetically generated sample documents with varying degrees of skewness. The results demonstrate that document skew adversely affects the data extraction accuracy of all the tested LLMs, with the severity of the impact varying across models. We identify the safe in-plane rotation angles (SIPRA) for each model and investigate the effects of skew on model hallucinations. Furthermore, we explore existing skew detection and correction mechanisms and discuss their potential limitations. We propose alternative approaches, including developing new multi-modal architectures that are inherently more robust to document skew and incorporating skewing techniques during the pre-training phase of the models. Additionally, we highlight the need for more comprehensive testing on a wider range of document quality and conditions to fully understand the challenges and opportunities associated with using multi-modal LLMs for information extraction in real-world scenarios.

Related papers

• MetaSumPerceiver: Multimodal Multi-Document Evidence Summarization for Fact-Checking [0.283600654802951]
  We present a summarization model designed to generate claim-specific summaries useful for fact-checking from multimodal datasets. We introduce a dynamic perceiver-based model that can handle inputs from multiple modalities of arbitrary lengths. Our approach outperforms the SOTA approach by 4.6% in the claim verification task on the MOCHEG dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T01:33:20Z)
• Understanding Alignment in Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Study [46.33812471516309]
  We analyze each aspect of preference alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We show that combining offline and online methods can improve the performance of the model in certain scenarios. We introduce a novel way of creating multimodal preference data called Bias-Driven Hallucination Sampling (BDHS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T17:55:03Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Enrich the Documentation of Datasets for Machine Learning [1.8270184406083445]
  We explore using large language models (LLM) and prompting strategies to automatically extract dimensions from documents. Our approach could aid data publishers and practitioners in creating machine-readable documentation. We have released an open-source tool implementing our approach and a replication package, including the experiments' code and results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:09:28Z)
• Multi-modal Auto-regressive Modeling via Visual Words [96.25078866446053]
  We propose the concept of visual words, which maps the visual features to probability distributions over Large Multi-modal Models' vocabulary. We further explore the distribution of visual features in the semantic space within LMM and the possibility of using text embeddings to represent visual information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:52Z)
• MT-Eval: A Multi-Turn Capabilities Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [70.92847554971065]
  We introduce MT-Eval, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate multi-turn conversational abilities. By analyzing human-LLM conversations, we categorize interaction patterns into four types: recollection, expansion, refinement, and follow-up. Our evaluation of 11 well-known LLMs shows that while closed-source models generally surpass open-source ones, certain open-source models exceed GPT-3.5-Turbo in specific tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T04:50:28Z)
• BLESS: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Sentence Simplification [55.461555829492866]
  We present BLESS, a performance benchmark of the most recent state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on the task of text simplification (TS) We assess a total of 44 models, differing in size, architecture, pre-training methods, and accessibility, on three test sets from different domains (Wikipedia, news, and medical) under a few-shot setting. Our evaluation indicates that the best LLMs, despite not being trained on TS, perform comparably with state-of-the-art TS baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T12:18:17Z)
• Revisit Input Perturbation Problems for LLMs: A Unified Robustness Evaluation Framework for Noisy Slot Filling Task [18.623619585980688]
  We propose a unified robustness evaluation framework based on the slot-filling task to evaluate the dialogue understanding capability of large language models. Specifically, we construct a input perturbation evaluation dataset, Noise-LLM, which contains five types of single perturbation and four types of mixed perturbation data. Our aim is to assess how well various robustness methods of LLMs perform in real-world noisy scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:22:05Z)
• StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized Image-Dialogue Data [129.92449761766025]
  We propose a novel data collection methodology that synchronously synthesizes images and dialogues for visual instruction tuning. This approach harnesses the power of generative models, marrying the abilities of ChatGPT and text-to-image generative models. Our research includes comprehensive experiments conducted on various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T12:43:52Z)
• Towards General Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detection [95.73987327101143]
  Deepfakes are realistic face manipulations that can pose serious threats to security, privacy, and trust. Existing methods mostly treat this task as binary classification, which uses digital labels or mask signals to train the detection model. We propose a novel paradigm named Visual-Linguistic Face Forgery Detection(VLFFD), which uses fine-grained sentence-level prompts as the annotation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T10:22:33Z)
• Diffusion Model is an Effective Planner and Data Synthesizer for Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning [101.66860222415512]
  Multi-Task Diffusion Model (textscMTDiff) is a diffusion-based method that incorporates Transformer backbones and prompt learning for generative planning and data synthesis. For generative planning, we find textscMTDiff outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms across 50 tasks on Meta-World and 8 maps on Maze2D.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T05:20:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.