StrucText-Eval: Evaluating Large Language Model's Reasoning Ability in Structure-Rich Text

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.10621v3
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:06:06 GMT
• Title: StrucText-Eval: Evaluating Large Language Model's Reasoning Ability in Structure-Rich Text
• Authors: Zhouhong Gu, Haoning Ye, Xingzhou Chen, Zeyang Zhou, Hongwei Feng, Yanghua Xiao,
• Abstract summary: We introduce StrucText-Eval, a benchmark to evaluate how well large language models understand and reason through structured text. We show that while open-source LLMs achieve a maximum accuracy of 74.9% on the standard dataset, their performance drops significantly to 45.8% on the harder dataset. In contrast, human participants reach an accuracy of 92.6% on StrucText-Eval-Hard, highlighting LLMs' current limitations in handling intricate structural information.
• Score: 29.03935605732864
• License:
• Abstract: The effective utilization of structured data, integral to corporate data strategies, has been challenged by the rise of large language models (LLMs) capable of processing unstructured information. This shift prompts the question: can LLMs interpret structured data directly in its unstructured form? We propose an automatic evaluation data generation method for assessing LLMs' reasoning capabilities on structure-rich text to explore this. Our approach supports 8 structured languages and 29 tasks, generating data with adjustable complexity through controllable nesting and structural width. We introduce StrucText-Eval, a benchmark containing 5,800 pre-generated and annotated samples designed to evaluate how well LLMs understand and reason through structured text. StrucText-Eval is divided into two suites: a regular Test suite (3,712 samples) and a Test-Hard suite (2,088 samples), the latter emphasizing the gap between human and model performance on more complex tasks. Experimental results show that while open-source LLMs achieve a maximum accuracy of 74.9\% on the standard dataset, their performance drops significantly to 45.8\% on the harder dataset. In contrast, human participants reach an accuracy of 92.6\% on StrucText-Eval-Hard, highlighting LLMs' current limitations in handling intricate structural information. The benchmark and generation codes are open sourced in \url{https://github.com/MikeGu721/StrucText-Eval}

Related papers

• Struct-X: Enhancing Large Language Models Reasoning with Structured Data [38.558614152006975]
  Struct-X operates through five key phases: read-model-fill-reflect-reason'' It encodes structured data into a topological space using graph embeddings. It fills in missing entity information with knowledge retrieval modules. The final phase involves constructing a topological network with selected tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T13:06:25Z)
• StructLM: Towards Building Generalist Models for Structured Knowledge Grounding [49.10029030628653]
  Large language models' (LLMs) ability to process structured data lags behind state-of-the-art (SoTA) model by an average of 35%. We train a series of models, referred to as StructLM, based on the Mistral and the CodeLlama model family, ranging from 7B to 34B parameters. Our StructLM series surpasses task-specific models on 16 out of 18 evaluated datasets and establishes new SoTA performance on 8 SKG tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T15:47:01Z)
• A Simple but Effective Approach to Improve Structured Language Model Output for Information Extraction [11.165093163378152]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive abilities in generating unstructured natural language according to instructions. This paper introduces an efficient method, G&O, to enhance their structured text generation capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T20:42:02Z)
• Beyond Traditional Benchmarks: Analyzing Behaviors of Open LLMs on Data-to-Text Generation [0.0]
  We analyze the behaviors of open large language models (LLMs) on the task of data-to-text (D2T) generation. We find that open LLMs can generate fluent and coherent texts in zero-shot settings from data in common formats collected with Quintd.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T18:15:46Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• Struc-Bench: Are Large Language Models Really Good at Generating Complex Structured Data? [49.688233418425995]
  Struc-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark featuring prominent Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose two innovative metrics, P-Score (Prompting Score) and H-Score (Heuristical Score) Our experiments show that applying our structure-aware fine-tuning to LLaMA-7B leads to substantial performance gains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-16T11:31:58Z)
• StructGPT: A General Framework for Large Language Model to Reason over Structured Data [117.13986738340027]
  We develop an emphIterative Reading-then-Reasoning(IRR) approach for solving question answering tasks based on structured data. Our approach can significantly boost the performance of ChatGPT and achieve comparable performance against the full-data supervised-tuning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T17:45:23Z)
• One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings [105.82772523968961]
  INSTRUCTOR is a new method for computing text embeddings given task instructions. Every text input is embedded together with instructions explaining the use case. We evaluate INSTRUCTOR on 70 embedding evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T18:57:05Z)
• Explaining Patterns in Data with Language Models via Interpretable Autoprompting [143.4162028260874]
  We introduce interpretable autoprompting (iPrompt), an algorithm that generates a natural-language string explaining the data. iPrompt can yield meaningful insights by accurately finding groundtruth dataset descriptions. Experiments with an fMRI dataset show the potential for iPrompt to aid in scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T18:32:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.