GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11149v1
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 02:27:32 GMT
- Title: GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory
- Authors: Wei Fan, Haoran Li, Zheye Deng, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song,
- Abstract summary: Existing research studies privacy by exploring various privacy attacks, defenses, and evaluations within narrowly predefined patterns.
We introduce a novel framework, GoldCoin, designed to efficiently ground LLMs in privacy laws for judicial assessing privacy violations.
Our framework leverages the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge, creating numerous synthetic scenarios grounded in relevant privacy statutes.
- Score: 44.297102658873726
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Privacy issues arise prominently during the inappropriate transmission of information between entities. Existing research primarily studies privacy by exploring various privacy attacks, defenses, and evaluations within narrowly predefined patterns, while neglecting that privacy is not an isolated, context-free concept limited to traditionally sensitive data (e.g., social security numbers), but intertwined with intricate social contexts that complicate the identification and analysis of potential privacy violations. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for incorporating the nuanced scenarios outlined in privacy laws to tackle these complex privacy issues. However, the scarcity of open-source relevant case studies restricts the efficiency of LLMs in aligning with specific legal statutes. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel framework, GoldCoin, designed to efficiently ground LLMs in privacy laws for judicial assessing privacy violations. Our framework leverages the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge, creating numerous synthetic scenarios grounded in relevant privacy statutes (e.g., HIPAA), to assist LLMs in comprehending the complex contexts for identifying privacy risks in the real world. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that GoldCoin markedly enhances LLMs' capabilities in recognizing privacy risks across real court cases, surpassing the baselines on different judicial tasks.
Related papers
- Privacy Risks of General-Purpose AI Systems: A Foundation for Investigating Practitioner Perspectives [47.17703009473386]
Powerful AI models have led to impressive leaps in performance across a wide range of tasks.
Privacy concerns have led to a wealth of literature covering various privacy risks and vulnerabilities of AI models.
We conduct a systematic review of these survey papers to provide a concise and usable overview of privacy risks in GPAIS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T07:49:48Z) - Centering Policy and Practice: Research Gaps around Usable Differential Privacy [12.340264479496375]
We argue that while differential privacy is a clean formulation in theory, it poses significant challenges in practice.
To bridge the gaps between differential privacy's promises and its real-world usability, researchers and practitioners must work together.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T21:32:30Z) - No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference [30.554456047738295]
This study develops a framework for inferring privacy-protected Large Language Models (LLMs)
It lays down a solid theoretical basis for examining the interplay between privacy preservation and utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T08:22:53Z) - On Protecting the Data Privacy of Large Language Models (LLMs): A Survey [35.48984524483533]
Large language models (LLMs) are complex artificial intelligence systems capable of understanding, generating and translating human language.
LLMs process and generate large amounts of data, which may threaten data privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T08:47:48Z) - Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively.
Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z) - A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing.
Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data.
Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z) - Privacy-Preserving In-Context Learning with Differentially Private
Few-Shot Generation [37.55812121348268]
In-context learning (ICL) with large language models (LLMs) on private datasets poses privacy risks.
We propose a novel algorithm that generates synthetic few-shot demonstrations from the private dataset with formal differential privacy guarantees.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-21T03:59:00Z) - A Critical Take on Privacy in a Datafied Society [0.0]
I analyze several facets of the lack of online privacy and idiosyncrasies exhibited by privacy advocates.
I discuss of possible effects of datafication on human behavior, the prevalent market-oriented assumption at the base of online privacy, and some emerging adaptation strategies.
A glimpse on the likely problematic future is provided with a discussion on privacy related aspects of EU, UK, and China's proposed generative AI policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-03T11:45:18Z) - Advancing Differential Privacy: Where We Are Now and Future Directions for Real-World Deployment [100.1798289103163]
We present a detailed review of current practices and state-of-the-art methodologies in the field of differential privacy (DP)
Key points and high-level contents of the article were originated from the discussions from "Differential Privacy (DP): Challenges Towards the Next Frontier"
This article aims to provide a reference point for the algorithmic and design decisions within the realm of privacy, highlighting important challenges and potential research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-14T05:29:18Z) - Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guarantees [69.4202374491817]
We design privacy preserving exploration policies for episodic reinforcement learning (RL)
We first provide a meaningful privacy formulation using the notion of joint differential privacy (JDP)
We then develop a private optimism-based learning algorithm that simultaneously achieves strong PAC and regret bounds, and enjoys a JDP guarantee.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-18T20:18:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.