GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11149v2
- Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 03:00:43 GMT
- Title: GoldCoin: Grounding Large Language Models in Privacy Laws via Contextual Integrity Theory
- Authors: Wei Fan, Haoran Li, Zheye Deng, Weiqi Wang, Yangqiu Song,
- Abstract summary: Existing research studies privacy by exploring various privacy attacks, defenses, and evaluations within narrowly predefined patterns.
We introduce a novel framework, GoldCoin, designed to efficiently ground LLMs in privacy laws for judicial assessing privacy violations.
Our framework leverages the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge, creating numerous synthetic scenarios grounded in relevant privacy statutes.
- Score: 44.297102658873726
- License:
- Abstract: Privacy issues arise prominently during the inappropriate transmission of information between entities. Existing research primarily studies privacy by exploring various privacy attacks, defenses, and evaluations within narrowly predefined patterns, while neglecting that privacy is not an isolated, context-free concept limited to traditionally sensitive data (e.g., social security numbers), but intertwined with intricate social contexts that complicate the identification and analysis of potential privacy violations. The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers unprecedented opportunities for incorporating the nuanced scenarios outlined in privacy laws to tackle these complex privacy issues. However, the scarcity of open-source relevant case studies restricts the efficiency of LLMs in aligning with specific legal statutes. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel framework, GoldCoin, designed to efficiently ground LLMs in privacy laws for judicial assessing privacy violations. Our framework leverages the theory of contextual integrity as a bridge, creating numerous synthetic scenarios grounded in relevant privacy statutes (e.g., HIPAA), to assist LLMs in comprehending the complex contexts for identifying privacy risks in the real world. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that GoldCoin markedly enhances LLMs' capabilities in recognizing privacy risks across real court cases, surpassing the baselines on different judicial tasks.
Related papers
- Multi-P$^2$A: A Multi-perspective Benchmark on Privacy Assessment for Large Vision-Language Models [65.2761254581209]
We evaluate the privacy preservation capabilities of 21 open-source and 2 closed-source Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)
Based on Multi-P$2$A, we evaluate the privacy preservation capabilities of 21 open-source and 2 closed-source LVLMs.
Our results reveal that current LVLMs generally pose a high risk of facilitating privacy breaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-27T07:33:39Z) - Privacy in Fine-tuning Large Language Models: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions [11.338466798715906]
Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance across various domains.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of privacy challenges associated with fine-tuning LLMs.
We highlight vulnerabilities to various privacy attacks, including membership inference, data extraction, and backdoor attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-21T06:41:29Z) - Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models: Mechanisms, Applications, and Future Directions [0.0]
This survey explores the landscape of privacy-preserving mechanisms tailored for large language models.
We examine their efficacy in addressing key privacy challenges, such as membership inference and model inversion attacks.
By synthesizing state-of-the-art approaches and future trends, this paper provides a foundation for developing robust, privacy-preserving large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-09T00:24:09Z) - How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review [15.15468770348023]
We evaluate large language models' performance in privacy-related tasks such as privacy information extraction (PIE), legal and regulatory key point detection (KPD), and question answering (QA)
Through an empirical assessment, we investigate the capacity of several prominent LLMs, including BERT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and custom models, in executing privacy compliance checks and technical privacy reviews.
While LLMs show promise in automating privacy reviews and identifying regulatory discrepancies, significant gaps persist in their ability to fully comply with evolving legal standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T01:51:37Z) - PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action [54.11479432110771]
PrivacyLens is a novel framework designed to extend privacy-sensitive seeds into expressive vignettes and further into agent trajectories.
We instantiate PrivacyLens with a collection of privacy norms grounded in privacy literature and crowdsourced seeds.
State-of-the-art LMs, like GPT-4 and Llama-3-70B, leak sensitive information in 25.68% and 38.69% of cases, even when prompted with privacy-enhancing instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T17:58:38Z) - Privacy Checklist: Privacy Violation Detection Grounding on Contextual Integrity Theory [43.12744258781724]
We formulate the privacy issue as a reasoning problem rather than simple pattern matching.
We develop the first comprehensive checklist that covers social identities, private attributes, and existing privacy regulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-19T14:48:04Z) - No Free Lunch Theorem for Privacy-Preserving LLM Inference [30.554456047738295]
This study develops a framework for inferring privacy-protected Large Language Models (LLMs)
It lays down a solid theoretical basis for examining the interplay between privacy preservation and utility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T08:22:53Z) - Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively.
Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z) - PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind)
Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques.
In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z) - A Unified View of Differentially Private Deep Generative Modeling [60.72161965018005]
Data with privacy concerns comes with stringent regulations that frequently prohibited data access and data sharing.
Overcoming these obstacles is key for technological progress in many real-world application scenarios that involve privacy sensitive data.
Differentially private (DP) data publishing provides a compelling solution, where only a sanitized form of the data is publicly released.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-27T14:38:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.